Ricardo Gonzalez
SS Bowling Green Hot Rods| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | ATB | 364 | .203/.298/.247 | 1 | 18 | 22 | — | .165/.237/.201 |
| 2025 | 21 | ATB | 431 | .224/.330/.262 | 0 | 23 | 46 | — | .202/.281/.238 |
| 2026 | 22 | A+/ATB | 159 | .280/.344/.357 | 1 | 12 | 57 | — | .237/.280/.304 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBTB | 1 | .195/.261/.241 | 0 | 0 | 43 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 24 | MLBTB | 46 | .201/.269/.264 | 0 | 1 | 51 | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBTB | 95 | .206/.274/.281 | 1 | 2 | 58 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 35 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 18 | ROK | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 190 | 168 | 43 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 32 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 256 | 335 | 387 | 722 | 131 | 296 | 17 | 9 | 322 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 186 | 155 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 35 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 245 | 371 | 310 | 681 | 65 | 311 | 19 | 16 | 322 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 316 | 64 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 75 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 203 | 298 | 247 | 545 | 44 | 259 | 21 | 11 | 257 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 366 | 82 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 54 | 81 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 224 | 330 | 262 | 592 | 38 | 285 | 19 | 13 | 278 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 117 | 105 | 29 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 27 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 276 | 339 | 343 | 682 | 67 | 364 | 23 | 9 | 307 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 42 | 38 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 289 | 357 | 395 | 752 | 105 | 367 | 19 | 10 | 338 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 190 | 173 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 40 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 168 | 234 | 237 | 471 | 69 | 202 | 21 | 7 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 186 | 165 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 188 | 280 | 236 | 516 | 48 | 260 | 27 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 328 | 54 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 103 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 165 | 237 | 201 | 438 | 37 | 229 | 28 | 7 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 382 | 77 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 38 | 109 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 202 | 281 | 238 | 519 | 37 | 271 | 25 | 9 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 117 | 109 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 229 | 270 | 284 | 554 | 55 | 331 | 30 | 5 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 42 | 39 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 256 | 310 | 359 | 668 | 103 | 331 | 26 | 7 | 270 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 190 | 173 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 40 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 168 | 234 | 237 | 471 | 69 | 209 | 21 | 7 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 190 | 168 | 43 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 32 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 256 | 335 | 387 | 722 | 131 | 296 | 17 | 9 | 322 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 186 | 165 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 188 | 280 | 236 | 516 | 48 | 263 | 27 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 186 | 155 | 38 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 35 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 245 | 371 | 310 | 681 | 65 | 311 | 19 | 16 | 322 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 328 | 54 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 103 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 165 | 237 | 201 | 438 | 37 | 233 | 28 | 7 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 316 | 64 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 75 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 203 | 298 | 247 | 545 | 44 | 259 | 21 | 11 | 257 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 382 | 77 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 38 | 109 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 202 | 281 | 238 | 519 | 37 | 279 | 25 | 9 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 366 | 82 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 54 | 81 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 224 | 330 | 262 | 592 | 38 | 285 | 19 | 13 | 278 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 159 | 148 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 46 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 236 | 280 | 304 | 584 | 68 | 337 | 29 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 159 | 143 | 40 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 35 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 280 | 344 | 357 | 701 | 77 | 364 | 22 | 9 | 315 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Tampa Bay | — | 190 | 173 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 40 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 168 | 234 | 237 | 471 | 69 | 202 | 21 | 7 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 186 | 163 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 50 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 190 | 280 | 239 | 519 | 49 | 260 | 27 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 330 | 54 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 103 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 164 | 237 | 200 | 437 | 36 | 229 | 28 | 7 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 386 | 77 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 38 | 109 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 199 | 281 | 236 | 516 | 36 | 271 | 25 | 9 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 159 | 149 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 46 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 235 | 280 | 302 | 582 | 67 | 331 | 29 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 364 | 330 | 54 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 103 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 164 | 237 | 200 | 437 | 36 | 229 | 28 | 7 | 201 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 431 | 386 | 77 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 38 | 109 | 4 | 23 | 7 | 199 | 281 | 236 | 516 | 36 | 271 | 25 | 9 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 159 | 149 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 46 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 235 | 280 | 302 | 582 | 67 | 331 | 29 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 366 | 333 | 63 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 98 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 192 | 259 | 239 | 498 | 46 | 266 | 27 | 8 | 232 | 43 | -25 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +8 | -0.3 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB CTX | TB | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 195 | 261 | 241 | 502 | 46 | 270 | 0 | 0 | 234 | 43 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | TB | 30% | 151 | 137 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 199 | 266 | 262 | 528 | 63 | 268 | 26 | 8 | 244 | 51 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 44% | 215 | 195 | 39 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 56 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 204 | 272 | 280 | 552 | 77 | 270 | 26 | 8 | 253 | 58 | -11 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +5 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | TB | 51% | 273 | 247 | 51 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 71 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 207 | 276 | 293 | 568 | 86 | 271 | 26 | 8 | 260 | 62 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | TB | 30% | 46 | 42 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 201 | 269 | 264 | 532 | 62 | 272 | 26 | 9 | 246 | 51 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 44% | 95 | 87 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 206 | 274 | 281 | 555 | 75 | 274 | 26 | 7 | 255 | 58 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +2 | -0.2 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | TB | 51% | 139 | 126 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 36 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 209 | 278 | 293 | 571 | 84 | 275 | 26 | 8 | 261 | 62 | -6 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 280 | 255 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 73 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 208 | 276 | 282 | 558 | 75 | 278 | 26 | 8 | 256 | 44 | -14 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 592 | 123 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 51 | 169 | 5 | 14 | 5 | 208 | 276 | 282 | 558 | 74 | 278 | 26 | 8 | 256 | 44 | -32 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2095 | 1889 | 365 | 54 | 9 | 11 | 167 | 549 | 17 | 89 | 33 | 193 | 265 | 249 | 514 | 56 | 264 | 26 | 8 | 234 | 44 | -41 | +2 | +0 | +8 | +17 | -1.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 586 | 113 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 52 | 170 | 5 | 28 | 10 | 193 | 264 | 247 | 512 | 55 | 264 | 26 | 8 | 234 | 44 | -34 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 117 PAwOBA .299 → .246 (−53)K% 23.1% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.08% | ÷1.000 | ×1.310 | — | — | 30.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | — | ×1.012 | 5.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.77% | ÷1.000 | ×0.870 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 28.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 4.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.28% | ÷1.000 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 1.14% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .299 → .246; ISO .067 → .055; BABIP .364 → .331. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 42 PAwOBA .330 → .270 (−60)K% 19.0% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.05% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 25.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | — | 24.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | — | — | 5.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | — | — | 3.03% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .330 → .270; ISO .105 → .087; BABIP .367 → .331. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 431 PAwOBA .274 → .236 (−38)K% 18.8% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.79% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 25.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.53% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 8.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.93% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.73% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.56% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×1.026 | ×1.015 | 23.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.51% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | ×1.026 | ×1.015 | 3.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.70% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | ×1.026 | ×1.015 | 0.59% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .274 → .236; ISO .038 → .036; BABIP .285 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ACharleston RiverDogs · 364 PAwOBA .253 → .201 (−52)K% 20.6% → 28.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.60% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.71% | ÷1.047 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 7.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.10% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.58% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 19.22% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.56% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 3.86% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.099 | ×0.910 | ×1.007 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.41% | ÷0.824 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.41% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 65, 1B 114, 2B 103, 3B 120, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.
Result: wOBA .253 → .201; ISO .044 → .037; BABIP .259 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Rays · 186 PAwOBA .315 → .236 (−79)K% 18.8% → 27.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.82% | ÷0.999 | ×1.440 | — | — | 27.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.59% | ÷0.948 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 10.27% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.08% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷0.996 | ×0.820 | ×1.039 | ×1.008 | 21.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.83% | ÷1.020 | ×0.720 | ×1.039 | ×1.008 | 4.31% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×1.039 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.83% | ÷0.911 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.72% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 100, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.
Result: wOBA .315 → .236; ISO .065 → .048; BABIP .311 → .260. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 DSLDSL Tampa Bay · 190 PAwOBA .317 → .210 (−108)K% 16.8% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.84% | ÷0.976 | ×1.220 | — | — | 21.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.47% | ÷0.985 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 6.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.05% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.79% | ÷0.981 | ×0.680 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 16.10% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.68% | ÷0.973 | ×0.600 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 2.31% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.94% | ÷0.919 | ×0.600 | ×1.011 | ×1.008 | 1.96% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.21% | ÷1.273 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.82% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 155, 1B 96, 2B 95, 3B 84, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .317 → .210; ISO .131 → .070; BABIP .296 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).