Juan Baez
IF Wisconsin Timber Rattlers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | A/ROK/INTL3 orgs | 470 | .278/.355/.386 | 3 | 14 | 87 | — | .245/.302/.329 |
| 2025 | 20 | A+MIL | 442 | .201/.290/.224 | 0 | 6 | 30 | — | .182/.253/.202 |
| 2026 | 21 | A+MIL | 309 | .178/.258/.246 | 2 | 2 | 18 | — | .158/.219/.218 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 22 | MLBMIL | 1 | .191/.254/.240 | 0 | 0 | 43 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ35% MLB | 23 | MLBMIL | 81 | .198/.261/.264 | 1 | 1 | 52 | -0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ46% MLB | 24 | MLBMIL | 145 | .204/.269/.286 | 2 | 2 | 59 | -0.4 |
Tools · ContractCON 40 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK | DSL Brewers 2 | — | 221 | 198 | 53 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 31 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 268 | 332 | 359 | 690 | 91 | 298 | 14 | 8 | 309 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | A | Carolina Mudcats | — | 34 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 233 | 281 | 333 | 615 | 100 | 250 | 12 | 6 | 261 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK | ACL Brewers | — | 205 | 192 | 71 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 23 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 370 | 401 | 557 | 958 | 187 | 399 | 11 | 4 | 414 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A | Carolina Mudcats | — | 356 | 324 | 88 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 32 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 272 | 333 | 361 | 694 | 90 | 297 | 9 | 7 | 313 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK | ACL Brewers | — | 22 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 333 | 524 | 467 | 990 | 133 | 333 | 5 | 18 | 432 | 133 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | INTL | Peoria Javelinas | — | 92 | 78 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 295 | 402 | 474 | 877 | 179 | 362 | 20 | 14 | 390 | 150 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 389 | 78 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 46 | 48 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 201 | 290 | 224 | 514 | 23 | 226 | 11 | 10 | 245 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 276 | 49 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 56 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 178 | 258 | 246 | 505 | 69 | 213 | 18 | 9 | 235 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Brewers 2 | — | 221 | 203 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 167 | 221 | 207 | 428 | 39 | 194 | 16 | 5 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 34 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 194 | 219 | 258 | 477 | 65 | 218 | 18 | 3 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | ACL Brewers | — | 205 | 195 | 59 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 34 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 303 | 327 | 446 | 773 | 144 | 343 | 17 | 2 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 356 | 330 | 80 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 43 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 242 | 294 | 324 | 618 | 82 | 270 | 12 | 5 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL Brewers | — | 22 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 294 | 429 | 412 | 840 | 118 | 274 | 5 | 9 | 365 | 133 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 400 | 73 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 182 | 253 | 203 | 456 | 20 | 212 | 15 | 8 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 284 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 158 | 219 | 218 | 437 | 60 | 195 | 23 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Brewers 2 | — | 221 | 203 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 167 | 221 | 207 | 428 | 39 | 194 | 16 | 5 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Brewers 2 | — | 221 | 198 | 53 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 31 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 268 | 332 | 359 | 690 | 91 | 298 | 14 | 8 | 309 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 239 | 225 | 65 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 40 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 289 | 316 | 422 | 738 | 133 | 332 | 17 | 3 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 239 | 222 | 78 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 27 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 351 | 385 | 527 | 912 | 176 | 378 | 11 | 4 | 392 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 470 | 433 | 105 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 26 | 55 | 8 | 14 | 11 | 242 | 298 | 323 | 621 | 81 | 274 | 12 | 6 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 470 | 417 | 116 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 42 | 51 | 8 | 14 | 11 | 278 | 355 | 386 | 742 | 108 | 309 | 11 | 9 | 334 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 400 | 73 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 182 | 253 | 203 | 456 | 20 | 215 | 15 | 8 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ RAW | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 389 | 78 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 46 | 48 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 201 | 290 | 224 | 514 | 23 | 226 | 11 | 10 | 245 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 284 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 158 | 219 | 218 | 437 | 60 | 201 | 23 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ RAW | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 276 | 49 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 56 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 178 | 258 | 246 | 505 | 69 | 213 | 18 | 9 | 235 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Brewers 2 | — | 221 | 205 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 166 | 221 | 205 | 426 | 39 | 194 | 16 | 5 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 18 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 239 | 228 | 65 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 40 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 285 | 316 | 417 | 733 | 132 | 325 | 17 | 3 | 320 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 470 | 433 | 105 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 26 | 55 | 8 | 14 | 11 | 242 | 298 | 323 | 621 | 81 | 270 | 12 | 6 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 401 | 73 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 182 | 253 | 202 | 455 | 20 | 212 | 15 | 8 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 284 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 158 | 219 | 218 | 437 | 60 | 195 | 23 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 470 | 433 | 105 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 26 | 55 | 8 | 14 | 11 | 242 | 298 | 323 | 621 | 81 | 270 | 12 | 6 | 275 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 442 | 401 | 73 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 182 | 253 | 202 | 455 | 20 | 212 | 15 | 8 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 21 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 309 | 284 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 71 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 158 | 219 | 218 | 437 | 60 | 195 | 23 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB MLE | MIL | 0% | 419 | 384 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 86 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 194 | 256 | 245 | 501 | 51 | 244 | 21 | 7 | 232 | 43 | -28 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +9 | -0.8 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB CTX | MIL | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 191 | 254 | 240 | 494 | 50 | 240 | 0 | 0 | 229 | 43 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | MIL | 35% | 233 | 212 | 43 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 47 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 200 | 264 | 268 | 532 | 68 | 247 | 20 | 7 | 244 | 52 | -13 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +5 | -0.8 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | MIL | 46% | 314 | 286 | 59 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 63 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 207 | 271 | 289 | 560 | 82 | 250 | 20 | 7 | 255 | 59 | -15 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +7 | -0.9 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIL | 52% | 363 | 330 | 70 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 73 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 210 | 276 | 303 | 578 | 92 | 252 | 20 | 7 | 263 | 64 | -16 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +8 | -0.8 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIL | 54% | 391 | 356 | 76 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 79 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 213 | 279 | 311 | 590 | 98 | 254 | 20 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -15 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +8 | -0.7 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIL | 54% | 402 | 365 | 78 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 31 | 82 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 213 | 280 | 313 | 593 | 100 | 255 | 20 | 8 | 269 | 68 | -15 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +9 | -0.6 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | MIL | 35% | 81 | 74 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 198 | 261 | 264 | 526 | 67 | 243 | 20 | 7 | 242 | 52 | -5 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +2 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | MIL | 46% | 145 | 132 | 27 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 204 | 269 | 286 | 554 | 82 | 246 | 20 | 8 | 253 | 59 | -7 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIL | 52% | 188 | 171 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 38 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 208 | 273 | 300 | 574 | 92 | 249 | 20 | 7 | 261 | 64 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +4 | -0.4 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIL | 54% | 212 | 192 | 41 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 43 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 210 | 276 | 309 | 585 | 99 | 250 | 20 | 8 | 266 | 67 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +5 | -0.4 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIL | 54% | 218 | 197 | 42 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 45 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 211 | 278 | 311 | 589 | 100 | 251 | 21 | 8 | 267 | 68 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +5 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 844 | 766 | 160 | 25 | 4 | 14 | 64 | 171 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 209 | 276 | 307 | 583 | 98 | 250 | 20 | 8 | 261 | 55 | -36 | +1 | +0 | +0 | +18 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 590 | 123 | 19 | 3 | 11 | 49 | 132 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 208 | 274 | 307 | 581 | 98 | 249 | 20 | 8 | 261 | 55 | -28 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +14 | -1.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3578 | 3271 | 683 | 116 | 20 | 32 | 241 | 651 | 31 | 81 | 32 | 209 | 270 | 286 | 555 | 77 | 249 | 18 | 7 | 250 | 55 | -88 | +1 | +0 | +0 | +41 | -4.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 125 | 21 | 4 | 6 | 44 | 118 | 6 | 15 | 6 | 210 | 272 | 290 | 561 | 79 | 251 | 18 | 7 | 250 | 55 | -30 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +14 | -1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 309 PAwOBA .231 → .195 (−36)K% 18.1% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 23.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.027 | 6.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.65% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.027 | 0.53% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.91% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.004 | ×1.027 | 15.09% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.004 | ×1.027 | 4.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.45% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.004 | ×1.027 | 0.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.91% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.75% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.
Result: wOBA .231 → .195; ISO .069 → .056; BABIP .213 → .195. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 442 PAwOBA .242 → .213 (−29)K% 10.9% → 14.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.86% | ÷0.943 | ×1.270 | — | — | 14.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.41% | ÷0.965 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.042 | 7.98% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.68% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.042 | 0.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.53% | ÷1.023 | ×0.920 | ×1.011 | ×1.042 | 19.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.05% | ÷1.013 | ×0.810 | ×1.011 | ×1.042 | 1.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.29% | ÷0.900 | ×0.850 | ×1.011 | ×1.042 | 0.29% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.246 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.042 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 105, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 89, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .242 → .213; ISO .023 → .020; BABIP .226 → .212. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ACarolina Mudcats · 356 PAwOBA .307 → .269 (−39)K% 9.0% → 12.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 8.99% | ÷1.013 | ×1.360 | — | — | 12.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.02% | ÷0.980 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 5.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.40% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 1.14% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.26% | ÷1.066 | ×0.920 | ×1.007 | ×1.045 | 20.23% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.16% | ÷0.962 | ×0.830 | ×1.007 | ×1.045 | 5.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.37% | ÷1.007 | ×0.910 | ×1.007 | ×1.045 | 1.30% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.34% | ÷1.101 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 0.26% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 113, 2B 92, 3B 101, K 103, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.
Result: wOBA .307 → .269; ISO .090 → .081; BABIP .297 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Brewers · 22 PAwOBA .443 → .365 (−78)K% 4.5% → 6.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 4.55% | ÷1.002 | ×1.440 | — | — | 6.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.18% | ÷1.014 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 11.20% |
| HBP% /PA | 9.09% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 6.59% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.57% | ÷1.015 | ×0.820 | — | ×1.008 | 23.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.088 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 7.14% | ÷0.900 | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 5.76% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.947 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 103, 2B 118, 3B 80, K 100, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .443 → .365; ISO .133 → .128; BABIP .333 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Brewers · 205 PAwOBA .409 → .335 (−73)K% 11.2% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.22% | ÷0.969 | ×1.440 | — | — | 16.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.90% | ÷0.998 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 2.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.98% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 0.72% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.81% | ÷0.991 | ×0.820 | ×1.045 | ×1.022 | 24.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.47% | ÷0.952 | ×0.720 | ×1.045 | ×1.022 | 7.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.37% | ÷0.923 | ×0.720 | ×1.045 | ×1.022 | 1.97% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.37% | ÷0.898 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 2.10% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 98, 2B 90, 3B 85, K 94, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.
Result: wOBA .409 → .335; ISO .188 → .153; BABIP .399 → .343. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACarolina Mudcats · 34 PAwOBA .270 → .233 (−36)K% 11.8% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.76% | ÷0.990 | ×1.360 | — | — | 16.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.88% | ÷1.018 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 4.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.38% | ÷1.049 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.050 | 14.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.54% | ÷1.090 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 9.22% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.072 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 110, 2B 118, 3B 80, K 98, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 22.0 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .270 → .233; ISO .100 → .083; BABIP .250 → .218. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 DSLDSL Brewers 2 · 221 PAwOBA .306 → .197 (−110)K% 14.0% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.03% | ÷1.051 | ×1.220 | — | — | 16.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.69% | ÷1.012 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 5.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.90% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.022 | 0.65% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.55% | ÷0.999 | ×0.680 | ×0.972 | ×1.022 | 16.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.39% | ÷1.024 | ×0.600 | ×0.972 | ×1.022 | 3.14% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.992 | ×0.600 | ×0.972 | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.80% | ÷1.899 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.022 | 0.45% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 280, 1B 100, 2B 105, 3B 98, K 110, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.
Result: wOBA .306 → .197; ISO .091 → .039; BABIP .298 → .194. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .