Joe Rock
P Las Vegas Aviators| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AAATB | 27 | 23 | 140 | 4.58 | 3.54 | 21.6% | 5.7% | — | K 18.6% · BB 5.2% · FIP 3.77 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 35 | 15 | 104 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 21.9% | 9.1% | 0.1 | K 18.1% · BB 8.4% · FIP 4.31 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 38 | 6 | 54 | 5.47 | 4.66 | 27.2% | 19.0% | -0.1 | K 24.1% · BB 17.6% · FIP 4.65 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBOAK | 8 | 8 | 48 | 4.75 | 4.91 | 20.4% | 12.7% | 0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ80% MLB | 28 | MLBOAK | 7 | 7 | 41 | 4.83 | 4.93 | 20.6% | 12.5% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ84% MLB | 29 | MLBOAK | 6 | 6 | 36 | 4.94 | 5.05 | 20.2% | 12.5% | 0.1 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Rockies | 4 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 50% | 2.0 | 37.9% | 3.4% | 34.5% | 0.0% | 1.12 | 0.33 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Rockies | 4 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 50% | 2.0 | 37.9% | 3.4% | 34.5% | 0.0% | 1.12 | 0.73 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 116 | 492 | 120 | 49 | 12 | 100% | 5.3 | 18.5% | 11.4% | 7.1% | 2.1% | 4.82 | 4.13 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 22 | 116 | 492 | 120 | 49 | 12 | 100% | 5.3 | 24.4% | 10.0% | 14.4% | 2.4% | 4.82 | 3.64 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 93 | 408 | 112 | 34 | 14 | 100% | 4.6 | 22.1% | 8.9% | 13.2% | 3.8% | 4.66 | 4.44 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 93 | 408 | 112 | 34 | 14 | 100% | 4.6 | 27.5% | 8.3% | 19.1% | 3.4% | 4.66 | 3.75 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | 27 | 23 | 140 | 611 | 132 | 35 | 17 | 85% | 5.2 | 18.6% | 5.2% | 13.4% | 2.9% | 4.58 | 3.77 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | Durham Bulls | 27 | 23 | 140 | 611 | 132 | 35 | 17 | 85% | 5.2 | 18.6% | 5.2% | 13.4% | 2.9% | 4.58 | 3.77 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA RAW | Durham Bulls | 27 | 23 | 140 | 611 | 132 | 35 | 17 | 85% | 5.2 | 21.6% | 5.7% | 15.9% | 2.8% | 4.58 | 3.54 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 35 | 15 | 104 | 453 | 99 | 41 | 17 | 43% | 3.0 | 18.1% | 8.4% | 9.7% | 3.1% | 5.00 | 4.31 | +0.3 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 35 | 15 | 104 | 453 | 99 | 41 | 17 | 43% | 3.0 | 18.1% | 8.4% | 9.7% | 3.1% | 5.00 | 4.31 | +0.3 |
| 2025 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 35 | 15 | 104 | 453 | 99 | 41 | 17 | 43% | 3.0 | 21.9% | 9.1% | 12.8% | 3.8% | 5.00 | 4.50 | +0.1 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 6 | 54 | 268 | 73 | 51 | 6 | 16% | 1.4 | 24.1% | 17.6% | 6.4% | 2.5% | 5.47 | 4.65 | -0.1 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 6 | 54 | 268 | 73 | 51 | 6 | 16% | 1.4 | 24.1% | 17.6% | 6.4% | 2.5% | 5.47 | 4.65 | -0.1 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 38 | 6 | 54 | 268 | 73 | 51 | 6 | 16% | 1.4 | 27.2% | 19.0% | 8.2% | 2.2% | 5.47 | 4.66 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 8 | 0 | 18 | 91 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 0% | 2.2 | 25.3% | 16.5% | 8.8% | 1.1% | 4.00 | 3.77 | +0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | OAK | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 41 | 26 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.4% | 12.7% | 7.7% | 2.8% | 4.75 | 4.91 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 9 | 9 | 51 | 217 | 45 | 27 | 6 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.6% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 4.83 | 4.93 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | OAK | 7 | 7 | 43 | 181 | 37 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.2% | 12.5% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 5.05 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 36 | 22 | 5 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.6% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 4.83 | 4.93 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | OAK | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.2% | 12.5% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 4.94 | 5.05 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 21 | 13 | 95 | 416 | 89 | 56 | 11 | 62% | 4.5 | 21.5% | 13.4% | 8.1% | 2.6% | 4.71 | 4.40 | +1.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 44 | 27 | 200 | 876 | 187 | 118 | 23 | 62% | 4.6 | 21.5% | 13.4% | 8.1% | 2.6% | 4.71 | 4.40 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 146 | 88 | 515 | 2261 | 452 | 210 | 64 | 60% | 3.5 | 20.0% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.14 | +0.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 57 | 34 | 200 | 879 | 176 | 82 | 25 | 60% | 3.5 | 20.0% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.14 | +1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 44 IPFIP 4.49 → 4.76 (+0.27)K% 28.8% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.77% | — | ×0.860 | 24.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.92% | — | ×0.900 | 16.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.83% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.49 → 4.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAADurham Bulls · 97 IPFIP 4.61 → 4.31 (−0.30)K% 21.1% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.05% | — | ×0.860 | 18.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.33% | — | ×0.900 | 8.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.83% | ÷1.380 | ×1.100 | 3.05% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 176).
Result: FIP 4.61 → 4.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAADurham Bulls · 140 IPFIP 3.53 → 3.77 (+0.24)K% 21.6% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.60% | — | ×0.860 | 18.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.73% | — | ×0.900 | 5.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.78% | ÷1.061 | ×1.100 | 2.88% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 3.53 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAHartford Yard Goats · 90 IPFIP 3.62 → 4.44 (+0.82)K% 27.3% → 22.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.34% | — | ×0.810 | 22.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.10% | — | ×1.100 | 8.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.29% | ÷1.040 | ×1.200 | 3.80% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 3.62 → 4.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Spokane Indians · 108 IPFIP 3.54 → 4.13 (+0.59)K% 24.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.01% | — | ×0.770 | 18.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.91% | — | ×1.150 | 11.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.20% | ÷1.316 | ×1.250 | 2.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 163).
Result: FIP 3.54 → 4.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAHartford Yard Goats · 8 IPFIP 4.88 → 6.08 (+1.20)K% 28.9% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.95% | — | ×0.810 | 23.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.53% | — | ×1.100 | 11.58% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.26% | ÷0.992 | ×1.200 | 6.36% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 4.88 → 6.08, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKACL Rockies · 8 IPFIP 0.33 → 1.47 (+1.13)K% 37.9% → 25.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.93% | — | ×0.680 | 25.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.45% | — | ×1.250 | 4.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.029 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 0.33 → 1.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 60 | 21.0% | 13.1% | 1.05 | 4.74 |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Tyler Yates ('09) | 1.2 | 62 | 19.7% | 12.0% | 0.94 | 5.12 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Dwayne Henry ('84-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 67 | 23.8%* | 14.2%* | 0.90* | 5.02* |
| Doug Bochtler ('00) | 1.3 | 65 | 18.6% | 14.4% | 1.25 | 4.57 |
| David Aardsma ('15) | 1.7 | 48 | 23.1% | 12.4% | 1.09 | 4.27 |