Orlando Ribalta
P Washington Nationals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 55 | 0 | 58 | 3.43 | 3.22 | 31.9% | 13.5% | 0.9 | K 28.3% · BB 13.3% · FIP 3.76 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX3 levels | 31 | 0 | 33 | 5.67 | 5.80 | 20.8% | 13.6% | -0.5 | K 20.8% · BB 14.2% · FIP 5.88 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 54 | 0 | 51 | 3.53 | 3.69 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 0.5 | K 23.6% · BB 10.1% · FIP 3.93 |
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBWSH | 31 | 0 | 33 | 4.77 | 4.88 | 24.6% | 13.3% | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ86% MLB | 30 | MLBWSH | 24 | 0 | 25 | 4.90 | 5.03 | 23.8% | 13.2% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ89% MLB | 31 | MLBWSH | 18 | 0 | 19 | 5.06 | 5.21 | 23.0% | 13.2% | -0.1 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Nationals | 9 | 0 | 17 | 75 | 19 | 13 | 1 | 0% | 1.9 | 17.2% | 21.7% | -4.4% | 1.9% | 3.18 | 5.41 | — |
| 2019 | 21 | ROK RAW | GCL Nationals | 9 | 0 | 17 | 75 | 19 | 13 | 1 | 0% | 1.9 | 25.3% | 17.3% | 8.0% | 1.3% | 3.18 | 3.92 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK MLE | FCL Nationals | 11 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 15.8% | 12.0% | 3.8% | 1.9% | 4.24 | 4.32 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK RAW | FCL Nationals | 11 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.3% | 9.6% | 13.7% | 1.4% | 4.24 | 3.10 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 50 | 215 | 54 | 27 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 18.9% | 14.7% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 3.40 | 4.89 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 50 | 215 | 54 | 27 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 25.1% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 2.3% | 3.40 | 3.85 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 27 | 0 | 35 | 147 | 36 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 16.7% | 9.6% | 7.2% | 2.3% | 3.89 | 4.18 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 5 levels | 27 | 0 | 35 | 147 | 36 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.3 | 24.5% | 8.2% | 16.3% | 1.4% | 3.89 | 2.81 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 55 | 0 | 58 | 251 | 80 | 34 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.3% | 13.3% | 15.0% | 2.5% | 3.43 | 3.76 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 55 | 0 | 58 | 251 | 80 | 34 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.3% | 13.3% | 15.0% | 2.5% | 3.43 | 3.76 | +0.5 |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 55 | 0 | 58 | 251 | 80 | 34 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 31.9% | 13.5% | 18.3% | 2.0% | 3.43 | 3.22 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 31 | 0 | 33 | 154 | 32 | 21 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 14.2% | 6.7% | 5.0% | 5.67 | 5.88 | -0.5 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 31 | 0 | 33 | 154 | 32 | 21 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 14.2% | 6.7% | 5.0% | 5.67 | 5.88 | -0.5 |
| 2025 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 31 | 0 | 33 | 154 | 32 | 21 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.8% | 13.6% | 7.1% | 4.5% | 5.67 | 5.80 | -0.5 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 51 | 208 | 49 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 13.5% | 2.8% | 3.53 | 3.93 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 51 | 208 | 49 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 13.5% | 2.8% | 3.53 | 3.93 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 51 | 208 | 49 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 13.5% | 2.4% | 3.53 | 3.69 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 71 | 0 | 71 | 321 | 70 | 37 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 11.5% | 10.3% | 3.4% | 5.35 | 4.71 | -0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | WSH | 31 | 0 | 33 | 139 | 34 | 18 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.6% | 13.3% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.77 | 4.88 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | WSH | 28 | 0 | 30 | 125 | 30 | 16 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.8% | 13.2% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 4.90 | 5.03 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB MLE | WSH | 20 | 0 | 21 | 89 | 20 | 12 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 13.2% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 5.06 | 5.21 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | WSH | 24 | 0 | 25 | 106 | 25 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.8% | 13.2% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 4.90 | 5.03 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB CTX | WSH | 18 | 0 | 19 | 80 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 13.2% | 9.8% | 3.6% | 5.06 | 5.21 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 113 | 0 | 115 | 507 | 114 | 62 | 18 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 3.5% | 5.20 | 4.65 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 197 | 0 | 200 | 884 | 199 | 108 | 31 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 3.5% | 5.20 | 4.65 | -0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 223 | 0 | 261 | 1123 | 242 | 147 | 32 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.5% | 13.1% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 3.83 | 4.50 | -0.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 171 | 0 | 200 | 861 | 185 | 113 | 24 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.5% | 13.1% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 3.83 | 4.50 | -0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAARochester Red Wings · 8 IPFIP 2.40 → 2.55 (+0.15)K% 23.3% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.33% | — | ×0.860 | 20.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×0.900 | 9.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.40 → 2.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAARochester Red Wings · 7 IPFIP 4.19 → 4.66 (+0.47)K% 22.2% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.22% | — | ×0.860 | 19.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.41% | — | ×0.900 | 6.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.70% | ÷0.960 | ×1.100 | 4.25% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 4.19 → 4.66, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAARochester Red Wings · 36 IPFIP 4.01 → 4.32 (+0.31)K% 28.7% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.66% | — | ×0.860 | 24.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.29% | — | ×0.900 | 13.76% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.55% | ÷0.986 | ×1.100 | 2.84% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 4.01 → 4.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAHarrisburg Senators · 18 IPFIP 1.49 → 2.52 (+1.03)K% 45.1% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 45.07% | — | ×0.810 | 36.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.27% | — | ×1.100 | 12.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.41% | ÷0.990 | ×1.200 | 1.71% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 1.49 → 2.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAHarrisburg Senators · 21 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.18 (+0.53)K% 20.7% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.65% | — | ×0.810 | 16.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.70% | — | ×1.100 | 9.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.17% | ÷1.115 | ×1.200 | 2.34% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 6 IPFIP 1.09 → 2.01 (+0.92)K% 38.1% → 29.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.10% | — | ×0.770 | 29.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.52% | — | ×1.150 | 10.95% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.913 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 1.09 → 2.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AFredericksburg Nationals · 34 IPFIP 4.34 → 5.45 (+1.11)K% 22.6% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.60% | — | ×0.740 | 16.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.01% | — | ×1.180 | 15.36% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.74% | ÷1.074 | ×1.300 | 3.32% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 4.34 → 5.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 16 IPFIP 2.79 → 3.70 (+0.91)K% 30.4% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.43% | — | ×0.770 | 23.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.59% | — | ×1.150 | 13.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.45% | ÷1.114 | ×1.250 | 1.63% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 2.79 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.8 | 32 | 23.0% | 12.5% | 1.32 | 5.09 |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |
| Tim Byrdak ('13) | 1.7 | 42 | 21.4% | 13.3% | 1.22 | 4.35 |
| Amir Garrett ('24) | 1.7 | 55 | 26.7% | 13.3% | 1.52 | 4.95 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |