Ben Peoples
P Round Rock Express| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | AATB | 12 | 12 | 55 | 3.42 | 3.70 | 24.9% | 10.0% | — | K 20.2% · BB 11.0% · FIP 4.60 |
| 2025 | 24 | AAACWS | 45 | 0 | 49 | 3.33 | 3.84 | 23.0% | 12.7% | — | K 19.8% · BB 11.5% · FIP 3.78 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 54 | 0 | 63 | 3.02 | 3.88 | 24.9% | 12.8% | 0.5 | K 22.0% · BB 11.9% · FIP 4.05 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBTEX | 45 | 0 | 47 | 4.49 | 4.69 | 21.8% | 12.3% | -0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ79% MLB | 27 | MLBTEX | 39 | 0 | 41 | 4.59 | 4.69 | 21.9% | 12.1% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ85% MLB | 28 | MLBTEX | 37 | 0 | 39 | 4.67 | 4.74 | 21.9% | 12.0% | -0.1 |
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | 5 | 2 | 11 | 50 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 40% | 2.1 | 21.8% | 27.5% | -5.7% | 2.8% | 5.91 | 6.28 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Rays | 5 | 2 | 11 | 50 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 40% | 2.1 | 32.0% | 22.0% | 10.0% | 2.0% | 5.91 | 4.41 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 9 | 4 | 19 | 85 | 29 | 13 | 0 | 44% | 2.1 | 23.2% | 19.1% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 2.84 | 3.56 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 9 | 4 | 19 | 85 | 29 | 13 | 0 | 44% | 2.1 | 34.1% | 15.3% | 18.8% | 0.0% | 2.84 | 2.10 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 23 | 94 | 388 | 121 | 42 | 9 | 96% | 3.9 | 23.0% | 12.8% | 10.2% | 3.5% | 3.06 | 4.72 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 23 | 94 | 388 | 121 | 42 | 9 | 96% | 3.9 | 31.2% | 10.8% | 20.4% | 2.3% | 3.06 | 3.11 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | 22 | 22 | 84 | 365 | 96 | 45 | 7 | 100% | 3.8 | 20.3% | 14.2% | 6.1% | 2.2% | 4.06 | 4.42 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ RAW | Bowling Green Hot Rods | 22 | 22 | 84 | 365 | 96 | 45 | 7 | 100% | 3.8 | 26.3% | 12.3% | 14.0% | 1.9% | 4.06 | 3.50 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | 12 | 12 | 55 | 229 | 57 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 20.2% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 3.3% | 3.42 | 4.60 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | 12 | 12 | 55 | 229 | 57 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 20.2% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 3.3% | 3.42 | 4.60 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA RAW | Montgomery Biscuits | 12 | 12 | 55 | 229 | 57 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 24.9% | 10.0% | 14.8% | 2.6% | 3.42 | 3.70 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AAA MLE | Charlotte Knights | 45 | 0 | 49 | 204 | 47 | 26 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.8% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 1.6% | 3.33 | 3.78 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AAA MLE | Charlotte Knights | 45 | 0 | 49 | 204 | 47 | 26 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.8% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 1.6% | 3.33 | 3.78 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AAA RAW | Charlotte Knights | 45 | 0 | 49 | 204 | 47 | 26 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.0% | 12.7% | 10.3% | 2.0% | 3.33 | 3.84 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 63 | 257 | 64 | 33 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.0% | 11.9% | 10.1% | 2.4% | 3.02 | 4.05 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 63 | 257 | 64 | 33 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.0% | 11.9% | 10.1% | 2.4% | 3.02 | 4.05 | +0.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 54 | 0 | 63 | 257 | 64 | 33 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.9% | 12.8% | 12.1% | 2.3% | 3.02 | 3.88 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 16 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.7% | 11.8% | 2.9% | 4.4% | 2.76 | 5.73 | -0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | TEX | 45 | 0 | 47 | 198 | 43 | 24 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 2.7% | 4.49 | 4.69 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | TEX | 50 | 0 | 52 | 220 | 48 | 27 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.9% | 12.1% | 9.9% | 2.8% | 4.59 | 4.69 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | TEX | 43 | 0 | 45 | 191 | 42 | 23 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.9% | 12.0% | 9.9% | 2.9% | 4.67 | 4.74 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | TEX | 39 | 0 | 41 | 173 | 38 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.9% | 12.1% | 9.9% | 2.8% | 4.59 | 4.69 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | TEX | 37 | 0 | 39 | 165 | 36 | 20 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.9% | 12.0% | 9.9% | 2.9% | 4.67 | 4.74 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 92 | 0 | 96 | 406 | 84 | 49 | 13 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 12.0% | 8.7% | 3.1% | 4.31 | 4.57 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 191 | 0 | 200 | 842 | 174 | 102 | 27 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 12.0% | 8.7% | 3.1% | 4.31 | 4.57 | -0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 171 | 63 | 375 | 1578 | 337 | 211 | 40 | 37% | 2.2 | 21.4% | 13.3% | 8.0% | 2.6% | 3.44 | 4.39 | -0.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 91 | 34 | 200 | 842 | 180 | 112 | 22 | 37% | 2.2 | 21.4% | 13.3% | 8.0% | 2.6% | 3.44 | 4.39 | -0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAARound Rock Express · 46 IPFIP 3.23 → 3.49 (+0.26)K% 28.6% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.860 | 24.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.23% | — | ×0.900 | 11.90% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.59% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.75% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.23 → 3.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAACharlotte Knights · 49 IPFIP 3.85 → 3.78 (−0.07)K% 23.0% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.04% | — | ×0.860 | 19.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.75% | — | ×0.900 | 11.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.96% | ÷1.320 | ×1.100 | 1.63% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 164).
Result: FIP 3.85 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 55 IPFIP 3.71 → 4.60 (+0.89)K% 24.9% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.89% | — | ×0.810 | 20.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.04% | — | ×1.100 | 11.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.62% | ÷0.958 | ×1.200 | 3.28% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 4.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 84 IPFIP 3.49 → 4.42 (+0.93)K% 26.3% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.30% | — | ×0.770 | 20.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.33% | — | ×1.150 | 14.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.92% | ÷1.066 | ×1.250 | 2.25% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 3.49 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ACharleston RiverDogs · 84 IPFIP 3.26 → 4.72 (+1.47)K% 31.1% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.14% | — | ×0.740 | 23.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.86% | — | ×1.180 | 12.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.57% | ÷0.943 | ×1.300 | 3.55% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 3.26 → 4.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 10 IPFIP 1.77 → 2.58 (+0.81)K% 31.6% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.58% | — | ×0.770 | 24.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.53% | — | ×1.150 | 12.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.020 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 1.77 → 2.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Rays · 19 IPFIP 2.16 → 3.56 (+1.41)K% 34.1% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.12% | — | ×0.680 | 23.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.29% | — | ×1.250 | 19.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.948 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 2.16 → 3.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Rays · 11 IPFIP 4.28 → 6.28 (+2.00)K% 32.0% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.00% | — | ×0.680 | 21.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.00% | — | ×1.250 | 27.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.80% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.28 → 6.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 60 | 21.3% | 12.1% | 1.13 | 4.41 |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| David Aardsma ('15) | 1.7 | 48 | 23.1% | 12.4% | 1.09 | 4.27 |
| Bill Risley ('98) | 1.1 | 55 | 21.9% | 10.9% | 1.26 | 3.98 |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |