Shane Smith
P Charlotte Knights| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 32 | 16 | 94 | 3.05 | 2.45 | 29.6% | 7.6% | — | K 24.3% · BB 8.1% · FIP 3.01 |
| 2025 | 25 | MLBCWS | 29 | 29 | 146 | 3.81 | 3.80 | 23.5% | 9.3% | 2.8 | |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 17 | 66 | 6.24 | 3.90 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 1.2 | K 19.0% · BB 14.0% · FIP 4.01 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCWS | 23 | 23 | 136 | 4.16 | 4.28 | 23.6% | 10.9% | 1.8 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 28 | MLBCWS | 16 | 16 | 93 | 4.31 | 4.39 | 23.5% | 11.0% | 1.1 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 29 | MLBCWS | 12 | 12 | 71 | 4.46 | 4.55 | 22.9% | 11.2% | 0.7 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Brewers Gold | 3 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 6.00 | 3.35 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL Brewers Gold | 3 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 0.0% | 6.00 | 3.43 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 38 | 0 | 60 | 232 | 86 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.6 | 28.1% | 10.4% | 17.7% | 2.7% | 1.96 | 3.52 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 38 | 0 | 60 | 232 | 86 | 21 | 5 | 0% | 1.6 | 37.1% | 9.1% | 28.0% | 2.2% | 1.96 | 2.36 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 16 | 94 | 382 | 113 | 29 | 6 | 50% | 2.9 | 24.3% | 8.1% | 16.2% | 1.7% | 3.05 | 3.01 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 16 | 94 | 382 | 113 | 29 | 6 | 50% | 2.9 | 24.3% | 8.1% | 16.2% | 1.7% | 3.05 | 3.01 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 32 | 16 | 94 | 382 | 113 | 29 | 6 | 50% | 2.9 | 29.6% | 7.6% | 22.0% | 1.6% | 3.05 | 2.45 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 29 | 29 | 146 | 616 | 145 | 57 | 17 | 100% | 5.0 | 23.5% | 9.3% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 3.81 | 3.77 | +2.9 |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 29 | 29 | 146 | 616 | 145 | 57 | 17 | 100% | 5.0 | 23.5% | 9.3% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 3.81 | 3.77 | +2.9 |
| 2025 | 25 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 29 | 29 | 146 | 616 | 145 | 57 | 17 | 100% | 5.0 | 23.5% | 9.3% | 14.3% | 2.8% | 3.81 | 3.80 | +2.8 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 17 | 66 | 313 | 73 | 49 | 4 | 65% | 2.6 | 19.0% | 14.0% | 5.0% | 1.4% | 6.24 | 4.01 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 17 | 66 | 313 | 73 | 49 | 4 | 65% | 2.6 | 19.0% | 14.0% | 5.0% | 1.4% | 6.24 | 4.01 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 17 | 66 | 313 | 73 | 49 | 4 | 65% | 2.6 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 7.7% | 1.3% | 6.24 | 3.90 | +1.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 32 | 32 | 155 | 665 | 156 | 66 | 18 | 100% | 4.8 | 23.5% | 9.9% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 4.19 | 3.88 | +2.8 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | CWS | 23 | 23 | 136 | 574 | 135 | 62 | 15 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.6% | 10.9% | 12.7% | 2.6% | 4.16 | 4.28 | +1.8 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CWS | 16 | 16 | 97 | 411 | 96 | 45 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.5% | 11.0% | 12.4% | 2.7% | 4.28 | 4.36 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | CWS | 12 | 12 | 74 | 314 | 72 | 35 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.9% | 11.2% | 11.6% | 2.8% | 4.43 | 4.52 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB MLE | CWS | 10 | 10 | 58 | 246 | 55 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.2% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 4.61 | 4.73 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB MLE | CWS | 7 | 7 | 44 | 187 | 40 | 22 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 21.4% | 11.9% | 9.5% | 3.2% | 4.82 | 4.96 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB MLE | CWS | 5 | 5 | 32 | 134 | 28 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 6.4 | 20.6% | 12.3% | 8.3% | 3.5% | 5.06 | 5.22 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CWS | 16 | 16 | 93 | 393 | 92 | 43 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.5% | 11.0% | 12.4% | 2.7% | 4.31 | 4.39 | +1.1 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | CWS | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 69 | 34 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.9% | 11.2% | 11.6% | 2.9% | 4.46 | 4.55 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 30 | MLB CTX | CWS | 9 | 9 | 55 | 232 | 51 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.2% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 4.64 | 4.76 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 31 | MLB CTX | CWS | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 38 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.4% | 11.9% | 9.5% | 3.3% | 4.85 | 4.99 | +0.2 |
| 2032 | 32 | MLB CTX | CWS | 5 | 5 | 30 | 127 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.6% | 12.3% | 8.3% | 3.6% | 5.09 | 5.25 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 80 | 80 | 446 | 1893 | 432 | 206 | 55 | 100% | 5.6 | 22.8% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.14 | +6.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 36 | 200 | 850 | 194 | 92 | 25 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.8% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 2.9% | 4.44 | 4.14 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 128 | 65 | 370 | 1560 | 366 | 159 | 34 | 51% | 2.9 | 23.5% | 10.2% | 13.3% | 2.2% | 3.77 | 3.59 | +5.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 69 | 35 | 200 | 844 | 198 | 86 | 18 | 51% | 2.9 | 23.5% | 10.2% | 13.3% | 2.2% | 3.77 | 3.59 | +2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAACharlotte Knights · 53 IPFIP 3.88 → 4.01 (+0.13)K% 22.1% → 19.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.13% | — | ×0.860 | 19.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.57% | — | ×0.900 | 14.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.23% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.35% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.88 → 4.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 5 IPFIP 0.99 → 1.96 (+0.97)K% 40.0% → 30.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.00% | — | ×0.770 | 30.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.150 | 11.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 0.99 → 1.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABiloxi Shuckers · 88 IPFIP 2.43 → 3.01 (+0.57)K% 29.9% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.94% | — | ×0.810 | 24.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.34% | — | ×1.100 | 8.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.69% | ÷1.198 | ×1.200 | 1.70% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 140).
Result: FIP 2.43 → 3.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAANashville Sounds · 7 IPFIP 2.35 → 2.51 (+0.16)K% 25.0% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.860 | 21.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.71% | — | ×0.900 | 9.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 2.35 → 2.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACarolina Mudcats · 31 IPFIP 2.04 → 3.40 (+1.35)K% 40.3% → 29.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.32% | — | ×0.740 | 29.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.06% | — | ×1.180 | 9.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.42% | ÷1.072 | ×1.300 | 2.93% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 114).
Result: FIP 2.04 → 3.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 26 IPFIP 2.60 → 3.67 (+1.07)K% 33.7% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.66% | — | ×0.770 | 25.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.90% | — | ×1.150 | 11.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.98% | ÷1.033 | ×1.250 | 2.40% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 2.60 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.0 | 85 | 23.0% | 11.0% | 1.08 | 4.36 |
| Dick Kelley ('64-'71, 3 WAR*) | 2.6 | 87 | 21.4%* | 10.6%* | 1.04* | 4.26* |
| Bobby Castillo ('77-'85, 5 WAR*) | 3.4 | 86 | 22.3%* | 11.3%* | 1.23* | 4.27* |
| Junior Guerra ('21) | 2.5 | 85 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 1.17 | 4.06 |
| Dave Hamilton ('72-'80, 2 WAR*) | 3.5 | 78 | 21.3%* | 10.2%* | 1.13* | 4.58* |
| Rob Tejeda ('05-'11, 3 WAR*) | 2.2 | 74 | 21.8%* | 12.6%* | 1.00* | 4.23* |
| Bobby Ayala ('99) | 2.9 | 72 | 21.3% | 9.7% | 1.11 | 4.78 |