Steve Hajjar
P Lake County Captains| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | MIX3 levels | 15 | 15 | 52 | 3.61 | 2.51 | 38.4% | 14.8% | — | K 30.2% · BB 14.9% · FIP 3.67 | |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 15 | 64 | 3.64 | 4.59 | 22.5% | 20.1% | — | K 17.4% · BB 23.3% · FIP 5.59 | |
| 2024 | 23 | A+CLE | 30 | 2 | 40 | 7.26 | 6.33 | 19.4% | 22.2% | — | K 15.0% · BB 25.6% · FIP 7.00 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 5.31 | 5.31 | 21.2% | 15.5% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBCLE | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5.23 | 5.25 | 21.4% | 15.0% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 15 | 15 | 52 | 216 | 83 | 32 | 3 | 100% | 3.5 | 30.2% | 14.9% | 15.3% | 2.2% | 3.61 | 3.67 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 15 | 15 | 52 | 216 | 83 | 32 | 3 | 100% | 3.5 | 38.4% | 14.8% | 23.6% | 1.4% | 3.61 | 2.51 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 64 | 289 | 65 | 58 | 4 | 94% | 4.0 | 17.4% | 23.3% | -5.9% | 1.8% | 3.64 | 5.59 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 15 | 64 | 289 | 65 | 58 | 4 | 94% | 4.0 | 22.5% | 20.1% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 3.64 | 4.59 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 30 | 2 | 40 | 180 | 35 | 40 | 6 | 7% | 1.3 | 15.0% | 25.6% | -10.6% | 3.5% | 7.26 | 7.00 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 30 | 2 | 40 | 180 | 35 | 40 | 6 | 7% | 1.3 | 15.0% | 25.6% | -10.6% | 3.5% | 7.26 | 7.00 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | Lake County Captains | 30 | 2 | 40 | 180 | 35 | 40 | 6 | 7% | 1.3 | 19.4% | 22.2% | -2.8% | 3.3% | 7.26 | 6.33 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | 15.5% | 5.6% | 3.0% | 5.31 | 5.31 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 4 | 4 | 23 | 95 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.4% | 15.0% | 6.4% | 3.1% | 5.23 | 5.25 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 1 | 1 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 100% | 8.0 | 21.4% | 15.0% | 6.4% | 3.1% | 5.23 | 5.25 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 8 | 35 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 100% | 8.3 | 21.4% | 15.0% | 6.4% | 3.1% | 5.23 | 4.87 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 169 | 121 | 24 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.4% | 15.0% | 6.4% | 3.1% | 5.23 | 4.87 | +1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 61 | 32 | 156 | 685 | 142 | 145 | 16 | 52% | 2.6 | 20.8% | 21.2% | -0.4% | 2.4% | 4.55 | 5.35 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 78 | 41 | 200 | 876 | 182 | 186 | 21 | 52% | 2.6 | 20.8% | 21.2% | -0.4% | 2.4% | 4.55 | 5.35 | +0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Lake County Captains · 40 IPFIP 6.10 → 7.00 (+0.89)K% 19.4% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.44% | — | ×0.770 | 14.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.22% | — | ×1.150 | 25.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.33% | ÷1.190 | ×1.250 | 3.50% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 138).
Result: FIP 6.10 → 7.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Lake County Captains · 57 IPFIP 4.61 → 5.59 (+0.98)K% 22.6% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.57% | — | ×0.770 | 17.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.23% | — | ×1.150 | 23.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.56% | ÷1.060 | ×1.250 | 1.84% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.61 → 5.59, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKACL Guardians · 7 IPFIP 3.63 → 4.81 (+1.18)K% 21.9% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.88% | — | ×0.680 | 14.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.75% | — | ×1.250 | 23.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.349 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 170).
Result: FIP 3.63 → 4.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 44 IPFIP 2.20 → 3.67 (+1.47)K% 40.8% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.80% | — | ×0.740 | 30.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.64% | — | ×1.180 | 14.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.24% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.20 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Dayton Dragons · 7 IPFIP 2.82 → 3.85 (+1.03)K% 33.3% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.770 | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.00% | — | ×1.150 | 23.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.058 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 2.82 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).