Rodney Boone
P Akron RubberDucks| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AACLE | 9 | 7 | 39 | 3.26 | 3.72 | 22.3% | 8.9% | — | K 18.1% · BB 9.8% · FIP 4.56 |
| 2025 | 25 | AACLE | 18 | 18 | 78 | 2.31 | 2.93 | 22.9% | 7.0% | — | K 18.5% · BB 7.7% · FIP 3.64 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCLE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 18.4% | 8.0% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBCLE | 4 | 4 | 23 | 4.53 | 4.56 | 18.8% | 8.2% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ56% MLB | 29 | MLBCLE | 5 | 5 | 31 | 4.61 | 4.68 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 114 | 467 | 137 | 29 | 18 | 100% | 5.0 | 22.2% | 7.2% | 15.0% | 4.3% | 3.54 | 4.51 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 114 | 467 | 137 | 29 | 18 | 100% | 5.0 | 29.3% | 6.2% | 23.1% | 3.9% | 3.54 | 3.51 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | 18 | 17 | 80 | 348 | 90 | 32 | 14 | 94% | 4.4 | 19.9% | 10.6% | 9.3% | 4.7% | 4.95 | 5.36 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ RAW | Lake County Captains | 18 | 17 | 80 | 348 | 90 | 32 | 14 | 94% | 4.4 | 25.9% | 9.2% | 16.7% | 4.0% | 4.95 | 4.33 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 9 | 7 | 39 | 157 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 78% | 4.3 | 18.1% | 9.8% | 8.2% | 3.2% | 3.26 | 4.56 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 9 | 7 | 39 | 157 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 78% | 4.3 | 18.1% | 9.8% | 8.2% | 3.2% | 3.26 | 4.56 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | 9 | 7 | 39 | 157 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 78% | 4.3 | 22.3% | 8.9% | 13.4% | 2.5% | 3.26 | 3.72 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 18 | 18 | 78 | 315 | 72 | 22 | 5 | 100% | 4.3 | 18.5% | 7.7% | 10.8% | 2.1% | 2.31 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 18 | 18 | 78 | 315 | 72 | 22 | 5 | 100% | 4.3 | 18.5% | 7.7% | 10.8% | 2.1% | 2.31 | 3.64 | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | 18 | 18 | 78 | 315 | 72 | 22 | 5 | 100% | 4.3 | 22.9% | 7.0% | 15.9% | 1.6% | 2.31 | 2.93 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | CLE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 18.4% | 8.0% | 10.4% | 2.9% | 4.50 | 4.50 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 62 | 261 | 49 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 18.8% | 8.2% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.56 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 9 | 9 | 55 | 233 | 44 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 3.1% | 4.61 | 4.68 | +0.5 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 4 | 4 | 23 | 97 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.8% | 8.2% | 10.5% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.56 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 5 | 5 | 31 | 131 | 25 | 11 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 10.3% | 3.1% | 4.61 | 4.68 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 9 | 9 | 54 | 228 | 43 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.8% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.58 | 4.25 | +0.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 160 | 70 | 26 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.8% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.58 | 4.25 | +2.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 68 | 65 | 311 | 1287 | 260 | 110 | 48 | 96% | 4.6 | 20.2% | 8.5% | 11.6% | 3.7% | 3.56 | 4.53 | +1.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 44 | 42 | 200 | 828 | 167 | 71 | 31 | 96% | 4.6 | 20.2% | 8.5% | 11.6% | 3.7% | 3.56 | 4.53 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAkron RubberDucks · 78 IPFIP 2.93 → 3.64 (+0.71)K% 22.9% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.86% | — | ×0.810 | 18.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.98% | — | ×1.100 | 7.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.59% | ÷0.926 | ×1.200 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 3.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAkron RubberDucks · 39 IPFIP 3.75 → 4.56 (+0.81)K% 22.3% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.29% | — | ×0.810 | 18.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.92% | — | ×1.100 | 9.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.55% | ÷0.966 | ×1.200 | 3.17% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 3.75 → 4.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Lake County Captains · 80 IPFIP 4.29 → 5.36 (+1.07)K% 25.9% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.86% | — | ×0.770 | 19.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.20% | — | ×1.150 | 10.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.02% | ÷1.060 | ×1.250 | 4.75% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.29 → 5.36, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Lake County Captains · 66 IPFIP 4.94 → 5.91 (+0.97)K% 26.2% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.24% | — | ×0.770 | 20.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.45% | — | ×1.150 | 8.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.67% | ÷1.134 | ×1.250 | 6.25% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 4.94 → 5.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALynchburg Hillcats · 49 IPFIP 1.37 → 2.38 (+1.01)K% 34.1% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.05% | — | ×0.740 | 25.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.32% | — | ×1.180 | 5.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.08% | ÷1.015 | ×1.300 | 1.38% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 1.37 → 2.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 62 | 18.7% | 8.2% | 1.15 | 4.54 |
| Juan Gutierrez ('14) | 1.4 | 57 | 19.4% | 8.4% | 1.04 | 4.49 |
| Tyler Walker ('10) | 1.5 | 50 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 1.11 | 4.23 |
| J. C. Gutierrez ('07-'14, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 57 | 19.8%* | 8.5%* | 1.19* | 4.72* |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |
| Gary Wayne ('89-'94, 2 WAR*) | 1.2 | 62 | 19.9%* | 9.4%* | 1.05* | 3.88* |
| Cris Carpenter ('88-'96, 2 WAR*) | 2.1 | 69 | 18.3%* | 7.4%* | 1.15* | 4.29* |