Naswell Paulino
P Vancouver Canadians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22 | A+TOR | 30 | 10 | 86 | 4.59 | 4.25 | 23.1% | 10.4% | — | K 17.8% · BB 11.9% · FIP 5.41 | |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 38 | 0 | 55 | 4.39 | 4.51 | 19.5% | 11.3% | — | K 15.4% · BB 12.7% · FIP 4.97 | |
| 2024 | 24 | A+TOR | 24 | 0 | 28 | 5.20 | 4.18 | 22.0% | 12.2% | — | K 16.9% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.02 | |
| 2025 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBTOR | — | — | 0 | 4.61 | 4.61 | 22.1% | 10.7% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 28 | MLBTOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.63 | 4.66 | 22.1% | 10.7% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Blue Jays | 13 | 13 | 56 | 225 | 52 | 18 | 2 | 100% | 4.3 | 15.7% | 10.0% | 5.7% | 1.2% | 2.26 | 3.72 | — |
| 2017 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Blue Jays | 13 | 13 | 56 | 225 | 52 | 18 | 2 | 100% | 4.3 | 23.1% | 8.0% | 15.1% | 0.9% | 2.26 | 2.67 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.28 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | A RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.90 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | Dunedin Blue Jays | 23 | 23 | 97 | 427 | 109 | 57 | 8 | 100% | 4.2 | 18.9% | 15.8% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 3.82 | 4.82 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A RAW | Dunedin Blue Jays | 23 | 23 | 97 | 427 | 109 | 57 | 8 | 100% | 4.2 | 25.5% | 13.3% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 3.82 | 3.69 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | 30 | 10 | 86 | 376 | 87 | 39 | 12 | 33% | 2.9 | 17.8% | 11.9% | 5.9% | 4.2% | 4.59 | 5.41 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ RAW | Vancouver Canadians | 30 | 10 | 86 | 376 | 87 | 39 | 12 | 33% | 2.9 | 23.1% | 10.4% | 12.8% | 3.2% | 4.59 | 4.25 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 55 | 257 | 50 | 29 | 7 | 0% | 1.5 | 15.4% | 12.7% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 4.39 | 4.97 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 55 | 257 | 50 | 29 | 7 | 0% | 1.5 | 19.5% | 11.3% | 8.2% | 2.7% | 4.39 | 4.51 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | 24 | 0 | 28 | 123 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.9% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.20 | 5.02 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A+ MLE | Vancouver Canadians | 24 | 0 | 28 | 123 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.9% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.20 | 5.02 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | A+ RAW | Vancouver Canadians | 24 | 0 | 28 | 123 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.0% | 12.2% | 9.8% | 2.4% | 5.20 | 4.18 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | TOR | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 3.0% | 4.61 | 4.61 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | TOR | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.66 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | TOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.66 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.28 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 189 | 95 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.63 | 4.28 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 129 | 46 | 323 | 1413 | 245 | 184 | 40 | 36% | 2.5 | 17.4% | 13.1% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.96 | 4.83 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 80 | 29 | 200 | 876 | 152 | 114 | 25 | 36% | 2.5 | 17.4% | 13.1% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.96 | 4.83 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Vancouver Canadians · 28 IPFIP 4.13 → 5.02 (+0.90)K% 22.0% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.95% | — | ×0.770 | 16.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.20% | — | ×1.150 | 14.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.44% | ÷1.062 | ×1.250 | 2.87% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.13 → 5.02, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Vancouver Canadians · 53 IPFIP 4.38 → 4.97 (+0.59)K% 20.0% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.770 | 15.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.02% | — | ×1.150 | 12.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.86% | ÷1.253 | ×1.250 | 2.85% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 4.38 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 86 IPFIP 4.21 → 5.41 (+1.20)K% 23.1% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.14% | — | ×0.770 | 17.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.37% | — | ×1.150 | 11.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.19% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 4.19% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 4.21 → 5.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ADunedin Blue Jays · 97 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.82 (+1.16)K% 25.5% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.53% | — | ×0.740 | 18.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.35% | — | ×1.180 | 15.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.87% | ÷1.010 | ×1.300 | 2.41% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKDSL Blue Jays · 56 IPFIP 2.65 → 3.72 (+1.07)K% 23.1% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.11% | — | ×0.680 | 15.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.00% | — | ×1.250 | 10.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.89% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 1.24% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.65 → 3.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).