Derek Datil
OF Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | A/ROKTB | 244 | .260/.391/.321 | 1 | 11 | 55 | — | .205/.299/.253 |
| 2026 | 20 | ATB | 178 | .205/.299/.276 | 1 | 10 | 29 | — | .174/.249/.236 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBTB | 288 | .192/.266/.261 | 2 | 6 | 51 | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBTB | 53 | .201/.274/.281 | 1 | 1 | 58 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 45 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 41 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 317 | 200 | 517 | 259 | 20 | 15 | 257 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 203 | 161 | 44 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 33 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 273 | 406 | 348 | 754 | 75 | 336 | 16 | 16 | 343 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 156 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 51 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 205 | 299 | 276 | 575 | 71 | 295 | 29 | 10 | 269 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 41 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 162 | 244 | 162 | 406 | 243 | 27 | 10 | 207 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 203 | 173 | 37 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 48 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 214 | 310 | 272 | 581 | 58 | 275 | 24 | 10 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 161 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 69 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 174 | 249 | 236 | 485 | 62 | 280 | 39 | 7 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 244 | 210 | 44 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 59 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 210 | 303 | 257 | 560 | 48 | 285 | 24 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 244 | 196 | 51 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 41 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 260 | 391 | 321 | 712 | 61 | 323 | 17 | 16 | 328 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 161 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 69 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 174 | 249 | 236 | 485 | 62 | 293 | 39 | 7 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 156 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 51 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 205 | 299 | 276 | 575 | 71 | 295 | 29 | 10 | 269 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 244 | 214 | 44 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 59 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 206 | 303 | 252 | 555 | 47 | 270 | 24 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 160 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 69 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 175 | 249 | 237 | 486 | 62 | 280 | 39 | 7 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 244 | 214 | 44 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 59 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 206 | 303 | 252 | 555 | 47 | 270 | 24 | 10 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 178 | 160 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 69 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 175 | 249 | 237 | 486 | 62 | 280 | 39 | 7 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 288 | 260 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 90 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 192 | 266 | 261 | 527 | 69 | 282 | 31 | 8 | 244 | 51 | -17 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | TB | 34% | 155 | 139 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 47 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 198 | 272 | 280 | 553 | 82 | 284 | 30 | 8 | 254 | 58 | -8 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +3 | -0.5 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | TB | 34% | 53 | 48 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 201 | 274 | 281 | 556 | 81 | 288 | 30 | 8 | 255 | 58 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 53 | 48 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 208 | 283 | 312 | 596 | 104 | 290 | 30 | 8 | 255 | 48 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 589 | 123 | 25 | 0 | 12 | 49 | 196 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 209 | 283 | 312 | 595 | 104 | 291 | 30 | 8 | 255 | 48 | -32 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 680 | 603 | 118 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 59 | 207 | 9 | 26 | 3 | 196 | 277 | 264 | 541 | 68 | 286 | 30 | 9 | 240 | 48 | -14 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +6 | -0.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 576 | 113 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 56 | 198 | 9 | 25 | 3 | 196 | 278 | 266 | 543 | 69 | 286 | 30 | 9 | 240 | 48 | -35 | +2 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 178 PAwOBA .264 → .211 (−53)K% 28.7% → 39.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.65% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 38.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 7.08% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.69% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.33% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.040 | ×1.015 | 22.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.040 | ×1.015 | 5.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.040 | ×1.015 | 0.91% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.77% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.
Result: wOBA .264 → .211; ISO .071 → .055; BABIP .295 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Rays · 203 PAwOBA .337 → .258 (−79)K% 16.3% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.26% | ÷0.985 | ×1.440 | — | — | 23.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.26% | ÷0.991 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 10.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.48% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.06% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.34% | ÷1.018 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 23.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.47% | ÷1.026 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 4.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.78% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 0.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.78% | ÷0.809 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.75% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 104, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 97, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .337 → .258; ISO .075 → .060; BABIP .336 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 41 PAwOBA .251 → .207 (−44)K% 19.5% → 26.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.51% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 26.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.63% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 10.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.93% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 24.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .251 → .207; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .259 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).