Derek Datil

OF Charleston RiverDogs
Age 21 L/L 6'2" / 160 lbs A HR -6%H +4% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2037
Overview
APROSPECTMiLBFA 2038
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202519A/ROKTB244.260/.391/.32111155—.205/.299/.253
202620ATB178.205/.299/.27611029—.174/.249/.236
2027PROJMLE21MLBTB288.192/.266/.2612651-0.4
2028PROJ34% MLB22MLBTB53.201/.274/.2811158-0.2
Next 2 projected WAR -0.6Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2037Service0.0First FA2038
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.0M2031Ext$0.0M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$0.9M2034Ext$1.0M+3
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2026 A
Speed84
Whiff%34
BB%33
K%26
ISO18
wRC+17
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 1% · didn't stick 96%
CompsJaden Rudd (age 21) · Yeniel Laboy (age 20) · Oswal Leones (age 21)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONpark-neutral Marcel · 103 proj PA
wRC+†51
AVG/OBP/SLG.191 / .264 / .259
PA103
HR1
K%31
BB%8
ISO69
MLB%0%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -6.0 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-6BATRUN: +0.4 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: -0.6 runs (Positional adjustment)-1POSREP: +2.2 runs (Replacement-level credit)+2REPTotal WAR: -0.40-0.4WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
-0.4-0.22728
Tools · ContractCON 45 / POW 20
Toolsscout grade
CONTACT45
scouting grade only
POWER20
scouting grade only
EYE60
scouting grade only
SPEED50
scouting grade only
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2032
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2037
First FA Year   2038
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2032
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2036Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2037Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202519 ACharleston RiverDogs — 4135 7000 680 00 200317200517 259 2015 257 26 — — — — — —
202519 ROKFCL Rays — 203161 44711 33333 111 273406348754 75336 1616 343 61 — — — — — —
202620 ACharleston RiverDogs — 178156 32611 18513 101 205299276575 71295 2910 269 29 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202519 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 4137 6000 4110 00 162244162406 243 2710 207 26 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLEFCL Rays — 203173 37511 21483 111 214310272581 58275 2410 258 61 — — — — — —
202620 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 178161 28511 13693 101 174249236485 62280 397 211 29 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLE2 teams — 244210 44511 25593 111 210303257560 48285 2410 249 55 — — — — — —
202519 ROK RAW2 teams — 244196 51711 39413 111 260391321712 61323 1716 328 55 — — — — — —
202620 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 178161 28511 13693 101 174249236485 62293 397 211 29 — — — — — —
202620 A RAWCharleston RiverDogs — 178156 32611 18513 101 205299276575 71295 2910 269 29 — — — — — —
202519 ROK MLE2 teams — 244214 44511 25593 111 206303252555 47270 2410 249 55 — — — — — —
202620 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 178160 28511 13693 101 175249237486 62280 397 211 29 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202519 ROK MLE2 teams — 244214 44511 25593 111 206303252555 47270 2410 249 55 — — — — — —
202620 A MLECharleston RiverDogs — 178160 28511 13693 101 175249237486 62280 397 211 29 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202721 MLB MLETB 0% 288260 50922 23903 61 192266261527 69282 318 244 51 -17 +1 +0 -2 +6 -0.4
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202822 MLB MLETB 34% 155139 28512 13472 31 198272280553 82284 308 254 58 -8 +0 +0 -1 +3 -0.5
202822 MLB CTXTB 34% 5348 10201 4161 10 201274281556 81288 308 255 58 -3 +0 +0 -0 +1 -0.2
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 5348 10201 4161 10 208283312596 104290 308 255 48 -3 +0 +0 -0 +1 -0.2
/ 162G— A+C — 650589 12325012 4919612 120 209283312595 104291 308 255 48 -32 +2 +0 -4 +14 -2.0
Career— MLE — 680603 1181845 592079 263 196277264541 68286 309 240 48 -14 +1 +0 -2 +6 -0.9
/ 162G— MLE — 650576 1131745 561989 253 196278266543 69286 309 240 48 -35 +2 +0 -4 +14 -2.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 178 PAwOBA .264 → .211 (−53)K% 28.7% → 39.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA28.65%÷1.000×1.360——38.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.11%÷1.000×0.690—×1.0157.08%
HBP% /PA1.69%—×0.780—×1.0151.33%
Singles /BIP22.86%÷1.000×0.920×1.040×1.01522.20%
Doubles /BIP5.71%÷1.000×0.830×1.040×1.0155.01%
Triples /BIP0.95%÷1.000×0.910×1.040×1.0150.91%
Home runs /BIP0.95%÷1.000×0.800—×1.0150.77%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.

Result: wOBA .264 → .211; ISO .071 → .055; BABIP .295 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKFCL Rays · 203 PAwOBA .337 → .258 (−79)K% 16.3% → 23.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.26%÷0.985×1.440——23.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA16.26%÷0.991×0.620—×0.99510.12%
HBP% /PA1.48%—×0.720—×0.9951.06%
Singles /BIP27.34%÷1.018×0.820×1.050×0.99523.00%
Doubles /BIP5.47%÷1.026×0.720×1.050×0.9954.01%
Triples /BIP0.78%÷1.150×0.720×1.050×0.9950.51%
Home runs /BIP0.78%÷0.809×0.780—×0.9950.75%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 104, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 97, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .337 → .258; ISO .075 → .060; BABIP .336 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 41 PAwOBA .251 → .207 (−44)K% 19.5% → 26.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.51%÷1.006×1.360——26.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA14.63%÷0.985×0.690—×1.03010.56%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.780—×1.0300.00%
Singles /BIP25.93%÷1.013×0.920—×1.03024.26%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷0.850×0.830—×1.0300.00%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.121×0.910—×1.0300.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.159×0.800—×1.0300.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .251 → .207; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .259 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).