Willmer De La Cruz
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19 | ROKTB | 127 | .283/.397/.358 | 1 | 9 | 55 | — | .204/.286/.265 |
| 2023 | 20 | A/ROKTB | 100 | .185/.320/.235 | 0 | 6 | 16 | — | .150/.248/.194 |
| 2024 | 21 | A/ROKATL | 130 | .213/.338/.259 | 0 | 9 | 31 | — | .155/.246/.190 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK | DSL Rays 2 | — | 210 | 165 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 51 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 261 | 416 | 376 | 792 | 115 | 363 | 24 | 20 | 366 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 127 | 106 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 28 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 283 | 397 | 358 | 755 | 75 | 377 | 22 | 15 | 348 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 24 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 217 | 250 | 348 | 598 | 130 | 385 | 42 | 0 | 265 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 76 | 58 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 172 | 342 | 190 | 532 | 17 | 238 | 24 | 17 | 263 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 91 | 76 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 32 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 184 | 308 | 224 | 531 | 39 | 318 | 35 | 14 | 259 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK | FCL Braves | — | 39 | 32 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 281 | 410 | 344 | 754 | 62 | 346 | 15 | 18 | 354 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 210 | 176 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 165 | 297 | 222 | 518 | 57 | 244 | 29 | 14 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 127 | 113 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 204 | 286 | 265 | 551 | 62 | 308 | 31 | 9 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 24 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 208 | 304 | 513 | 130 | 349 | 58 | 0 | 175 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 76 | 63 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 143 | 260 | 159 | 419 | 16 | 202 | 34 | 11 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Augusta GreenJackets | — | 91 | 81 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 43 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 148 | 242 | 185 | 427 | 37 | 313 | 47 | 10 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | — | 39 | 35 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 171 | 256 | 200 | 456 | 29 | 261 | 21 | 10 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 210 | 176 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 165 | 297 | 222 | 518 | 57 | 241 | 29 | 14 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays 2 | — | 210 | 165 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 51 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 261 | 416 | 376 | 792 | 115 | 363 | 24 | 20 | 366 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 127 | 113 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 204 | 286 | 265 | 551 | 62 | 306 | 31 | 9 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 127 | 106 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 28 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 283 | 397 | 358 | 755 | 75 | 377 | 22 | 15 | 348 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 100 | 86 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 140 | 237 | 174 | 412 | 35 | 250 | 40 | 8 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 100 | 81 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 28 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 185 | 320 | 235 | 554 | 49 | 273 | 28 | 13 | 263 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 130 | 115 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 51 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 165 | 262 | 200 | 462 | 35 | 297 | 39 | 11 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 130 | 108 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 38 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 213 | 338 | 259 | 598 | 46 | 329 | 29 | 15 | 287 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays 2 | — | 210 | 175 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 166 | 297 | 223 | 520 | 57 | 244 | 29 | 14 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 127 | 113 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 204 | 286 | 265 | 551 | 62 | 308 | 31 | 9 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 100 | 89 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 135 | 237 | 169 | 406 | 34 | 237 | 40 | 8 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 130 | 114 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 51 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 167 | 262 | 202 | 463 | 35 | 297 | 39 | 11 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 130 | 114 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 51 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 167 | 262 | 202 | 463 | 35 | 297 | 39 | 11 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 567 | 490 | 83 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 64 | 191 | 8 | 45 | 19 | 169 | 276 | 218 | 494 | 49 | 270 | 34 | 11 | 232 | 43 | -38 | +1 | +0 | +6 | +12 | -1.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 562 | 95 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 73 | 219 | 9 | 52 | 22 | 169 | 274 | 217 | 492 | 48 | 270 | 34 | 11 | 232 | 43 | -44 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAugusta GreenJackets · 91 PAwOBA .253 → .199 (−54)K% 35.2% → 47.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 35.16% | ÷1.009 | ×1.360 | — | — | 47.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.29% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 10.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.10% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.27% | ÷0.959 | ×0.920 | ×1.022 | ×1.015 | 27.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.27% | ÷0.983 | ×0.830 | ×1.022 | ×1.015 | 1.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.022 | ×1.015 | 2.15% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.010 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 92, 2B 97, 3B 100, K 102, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .253 → .199; ISO .039 → .031; BABIP .318 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Braves · 39 PAwOBA .346 → .246 (−100)K% 15.4% → 21.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.38% | ÷1.037 | ×1.440 | — | — | 21.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.95% | ÷0.965 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 11.35% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷1.047 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 20.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.022 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 5.34% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.266 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 153, 1B 109, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 107, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .346 → .246; ISO .062 → .044; BABIP .346 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Rays · 76 PAwOBA .265 → .198 (−67)K% 23.7% → 34.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.68% | ÷0.999 | ×1.440 | — | — | 34.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.11% | ÷0.948 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 11.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.63% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.89% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.50% | ÷0.996 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 19.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.50% | ÷1.020 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 1.84% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.911 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 82, 1B 99, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 100, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .265 → .198; ISO .017 → .013; BABIP .238 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ACharleston RiverDogs · 24 PAwOBA .257 → .175 (−82)K% 41.7% → 57.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 41.67% | ÷0.985 | ×1.360 | — | — | 57.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷1.035 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.17% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 3.35% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.071 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.030 | 20.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷0.964 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.030 | 6.82% |
| Triples /BIP | 7.69% | ÷0.938 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.030 | 7.69% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.075 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 114, 2B 93, 3B 88, K 97, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .257 → .175; ISO .130 → .091; BABIP .385 → .349. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Rays · 127 PAwOBA .340 → .250 (−89)K% 22.0% → 31.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.05% | ÷1.005 | ×1.440 | — | — | 31.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.96% | ÷0.956 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 9.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.79% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.57% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.05% | ÷1.023 | ×0.820 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 26.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷0.933 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 3.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.28% | ÷1.005 | ×0.720 | ×1.022 | ×1.008 | 0.95% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.28% | ÷0.902 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 1.12% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 105, 2B 87, 3B 101, K 101, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .340 → .250; ISO .075 → .058; BABIP .377 → .308. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 DSLDSL Rays 2 · 210 PAwOBA .360 → .251 (−109)K% 24.3% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.29% | ÷1.032 | ×1.220 | — | — | 28.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 19.52% | ÷0.971 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 14.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.43% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 1.01% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.32% | ÷1.011 | ×0.680 | ×1.045 | ×1.008 | 18.64% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.89% | ÷1.102 | ×0.600 | ×1.045 | ×1.008 | 4.53% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.75% | ÷0.904 | ×0.600 | ×1.045 | ×1.008 | 1.23% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.75% | ÷0.890 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.93% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 102, 2B 120, 3B 81, K 106, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.
Result: wOBA .360 → .251; ISO .115 → .070; BABIP .363 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).