Sung-Mun Song
3B San Diego Padres| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 29 | AAASD | 125 | .265/.336/.319 | 1 | 1 | 51 | — | .222/.272/.265 |
| 2026 | 29 | MLBSD | 154 | .191/.293/.244 | 1 | 13 | 55 | -0.3 | |
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBSD | 155 | .186/.266/.245 | 1 | 6 | 50 | -0.5 | |
| 2028PROJ65% MLB | 31 | MLBSD | 133 | .184/.264/.243 | 1 | 4 | 48 | -0.6 |
Tools · ContractCON 47 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 29 | MLB | San Diego Padres | — | 154 | 131 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 31 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 191 | 293 | 244 | 538 | 53 | 240 | 20 | 12 | 250 | 55 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.3 |
| 2026 | 29 | AAA | El Paso Chihuahuas | — | 125 | 113 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 265 | 336 | 319 | 655 | 53 | 349 | 23 | 10 | 303 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | — | 154 | 131 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 31 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 191 | 293 | 244 | 538 | 53 | 240 | 20 | 12 | 250 | 56 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.3 | ||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 29 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | — | 154 | 132 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 31 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 189 | 287 | 242 | 529 | 53 | 240 | 20 | 12 | 249 | 55 | -8 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.3 |
| 2026 | 29 | AAA MLE | El Paso Chihuahuas | — | 125 | 117 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 222 | 272 | 265 | 537 | 43 | 316 | 28 | 6 | 243 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 29 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 279 | 249 | 52 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 66 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 209 | 284 | 261 | 545 | 52 | 275 | 24 | 9 | 246 | 53 | -16 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.8 |
| 2026 | 29 | MLB RAW | 2 teams | — | 279 | 244 | 55 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 60 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 225 | 313 | 279 | 591 | 53 | 290 | 22 | 11 | 274 | 53 | -16 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.8 |
| 2026 | 29 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 279 | 251 | 52 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 66 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 207 | 284 | 259 | 543 | 52 | 274 | 24 | 9 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 29 | MLB MLE | 2 teams | — | 279 | 251 | 52 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 66 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 207 | 284 | 259 | 543 | 52 | 274 | 24 | 9 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB MLE | SD | 100% | 329 | 293 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 76 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 189 | 269 | 249 | 518 | 61 | 243 | 23 | 10 | 242 | 50 | -20 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +7 | -0.4 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB CTX | SD | 100% | 155 | 139 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 36 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 186 | 266 | 245 | 511 | 59 | 239 | 23 | 10 | 239 | 50 | -9 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | SD | 65% | 204 | 183 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 48 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 187 | 266 | 247 | 513 | 60 | 242 | 24 | 9 | 240 | 48 | -13 | +0 | -3 | +1 | +4 | -1.0 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | SD | 65% | 133 | 119 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 31 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 184 | 264 | 243 | 507 | 59 | 238 | 23 | 10 | 237 | 48 | -8 | +0 | -2 | +0 | +3 | -0.6 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 287 | 250 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 62 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 184 | 277 | 236 | 513 | 52 | 234 | 22 | 11 | 244 | 51 | -16 | +1 | -2 | +1 | +6 | -0.9 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 566 | 105 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 72 | 140 | 0 | 39 | 11 | 186 | 277 | 240 | 518 | 55 | 235 | 22 | 11 | 244 | 51 | -37 | +3 | -4 | +3 | +14 | -2.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 638 | 571 | 111 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 60 | 150 | 0 | 26 | 9 | 194 | 271 | 249 | 520 | 54 | 253 | 24 | 9 | 243 | 51 | -30 | +2 | -3 | +2 | +11 | -1.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 582 | 113 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 61 | 153 | 0 | 26 | 9 | 194 | 271 | 247 | 518 | 53 | 253 | 24 | 9 | 243 | 51 | -38 | +2 | -4 | +3 | +14 | -2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 125 PAwOBA .295 → .243 (−52)K% 23.2% → 27.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.20% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | — | — | 27.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.972 | 6.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×0.972 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.930 | ×1.015 | ×0.972 | 28.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.015 | ×0.972 | 2.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×1.015 | ×0.972 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.972 | 0.81% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.
Result: wOBA .295 → .243; ISO .053 → .039; BABIP .349 → .316. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).