Jose Pena Jr.
P Jersey Shore BlueClaws| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | APHI | 32 | 0 | 51 | 5.47 | 3.10 | 30.2% | 12.8% | — | K 22.4% · BB 15.1% · FIP 4.21 |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 34 | 0 | 41 | 1.54 | 2.69 | 25.9% | 8.2% | — | K 19.5% · BB 9.6% · FIP 3.50 |
| 2026 | 23 | A+PHI | 19 | 0 | 24 | 2.59 | 2.44 | 35.1% | 13.4% | — | K 27.0% · BB 15.4% · FIP 3.48 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBPHI | — | — | 0 | 4.59 | 4.59 | 23.7% | 12.5% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBPHI | 12 | 0 | 13 | 4.48 | 4.42 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 35.7% | 21.4% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 13.50 | 2.80 | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 35.7% | 21.4% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 13.50 | 2.73 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 9 | 7 | 27 | 127 | 28 | 19 | 2 | 78% | 3.0 | 15.0% | 18.7% | -3.7% | 2.3% | 6.59 | 5.48 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | 9 | 7 | 27 | 127 | 28 | 19 | 2 | 78% | 3.0 | 22.0% | 15.0% | 7.1% | 1.6% | 6.59 | 4.09 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 14 | 2 | 32 | 155 | 31 | 32 | 3 | 14% | 2.3 | 13.6% | 25.8% | -12.2% | 2.6% | 6.68 | 6.67 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | 14 | 2 | 32 | 155 | 31 | 32 | 3 | 14% | 2.3 | 20.0% | 20.6% | -0.6% | 1.9% | 6.68 | 5.36 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | 32 | 0 | 51 | 235 | 71 | 30 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 22.4% | 15.1% | 7.3% | 2.0% | 5.47 | 4.21 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Clearwater Threshers | 32 | 0 | 51 | 235 | 71 | 30 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 22.4% | 15.1% | 7.3% | 2.0% | 5.47 | 4.21 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Clearwater Threshers | 32 | 0 | 51 | 235 | 71 | 30 | 4 | 0% | 1.6 | 30.2% | 12.8% | 17.4% | 1.7% | 5.47 | 3.10 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 41 | 158 | 41 | 13 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.5% | 9.6% | 9.9% | 1.5% | 1.54 | 3.50 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 41 | 158 | 41 | 13 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.5% | 9.6% | 9.9% | 1.5% | 1.54 | 3.50 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 41 | 158 | 41 | 13 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.9% | 8.2% | 17.7% | 1.3% | 1.54 | 2.69 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Jersey Shore BlueClaws | 19 | 0 | 24 | 97 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.0% | 15.4% | 11.6% | 1.3% | 2.59 | 3.48 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ MLE | Jersey Shore BlueClaws | 19 | 0 | 24 | 97 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.0% | 15.4% | 11.6% | 1.3% | 2.59 | 3.48 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | A+ RAW | Jersey Shore BlueClaws | 19 | 0 | 24 | 97 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 35.1% | 13.4% | 21.6% | 1.0% | 2.59 | 2.44 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | PHI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.7% | 12.5% | 11.2% | 2.8% | 4.59 | 4.59 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | PHI | 28 | 0 | 30 | 126 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 2.8% | 4.48 | 4.42 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | PHI | 12 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 2.8% | 4.48 | 4.42 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 12 | 0 | 13 | 54 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 2.8% | 4.48 | 4.04 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 203 | 94 | 31 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 2.8% | 4.48 | 4.04 | +1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 112 | 9 | 179 | 786 | 155 | 132 | 15 | 8% | 1.6 | 19.7% | 16.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 4.68 | 4.64 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 125 | 10 | 200 | 880 | 173 | 148 | 17 | 8% | 1.6 | 19.7% | 16.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 4.68 | 4.64 | +0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 24 IPFIP 2.40 → 3.48 (+1.08)K% 35.1% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.05% | — | ×0.770 | 26.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.40% | — | ×1.150 | 15.41% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.29% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.40 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AClearwater Threshers · 25 IPFIP 2.55 → 3.39 (+0.84)K% 25.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.740 | 18.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.61% | — | ×1.180 | 8.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.09% | ÷1.083 | ×1.300 | 1.30% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 2.55 → 3.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 16 IPFIP 2.78 → 3.65 (+0.87)K% 27.3% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.770 | 21.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.150 | 10.45% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.52% | ÷1.045 | ×1.250 | 1.81% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 2.78 → 3.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AClearwater Threshers · 51 IPFIP 3.10 → 4.21 (+1.11)K% 30.2% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.21% | — | ×0.740 | 22.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.77% | — | ×1.180 | 15.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.70% | ÷1.115 | ×1.300 | 1.98% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 4.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Phillies · 32 IPFIP 5.09 → 6.67 (+1.58)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.65% | — | ×1.250 | 25.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.94% | ÷1.028 | ×1.400 | 2.63% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 5.09 → 6.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Phillies · 27 IPFIP 4.00 → 5.48 (+1.48)K% 22.0% → 15.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.05% | — | ×0.680 | 14.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.96% | — | ×1.250 | 18.70% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.57% | ÷0.947 | ×1.400 | 2.33% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 4.00 → 5.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).