Juan Gonzalez

C Birmingham Barons
Age 26 R/R 5'9" / 195 lbs AA HR +4% Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2035
Overview
AAPROSPECTMiLBFA 2036
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
202423ACWS95.188/.309/.2120119—.145/.245/.157
202524A+CWS64.086/.172/.08601-43—.068/.141/.068
202625AACWS20.235/.350/.2940156—.235/.350/.294
2027PROJMLE26MLBCWS2.201/.269/.2940059-0.0
2028PROJ27% MLB27MLBCWS35.202/.271/.2971161-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
ContractESTIMATED
Control thru2035Service0.0First FA2036
2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Ext$0.0M2030Ext$0.8M2031Ext$0.9M2032Ext$0.9M2033Ext$3M2034Ext$5M+1
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2025 A+
Speed60
Z-Con%45
K%28
Chase%19
Whiff%8
BB%2
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 100%
CompsJackson Cluff (age 26) · Chris Roller (age 26) · McCarthy Tatum (age 26)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONstats below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+†59
AVG/OBP/SLG.201 / .269 / .294
PA2
HR0
K%50
BB%7
BABIP286
ISO79
MLB%2%
Value2027 · WAR
BAT: -4.1 runs (wOBA-derived runs vs avg)-4BATRUN: +0.1 runs (SB/CS + UBR baserunning)+0RUNFLD: +0.0 runs (Defensive runs vs avg)+0FLDPOS: +1.5 runs (Positional adjustment)+1POSREP: +1.8 runs (Replacement-level credit)+2REPTotal WAR: +0.00+0.0WAR
trajectory · projected WAR by year
0.00.02728
Tools · Contract
Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)
Status   MiLB
MLB Debut   2030
Service   0 yrs (est)
Team Control Through   2035
First FA Year   2036
YearStatusSalary Proj WAR Value Surplus
2027MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2028MiLBstill in minors · estimated debut 2030
2029Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2030Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2031Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2032Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2033Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2034Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
2035Extbeyond projection horizon · no WAR estimate
Totals $0.0M $0.0M +$0.0M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
202120 ROKFCL Blue Jays — 4234 6110 472 01 176300265565 88207 1710 257 18 — — — — — —
202221 ADunedin Blue Jays — 10384 17301 9277 01 202330274604 71271 269 283 45 — — — — — —
202221 ROKFCL Blue Jays — 4336 8200 493 00 222349278627 56296 219 302 30 — — — — — —
202322 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 143116 31702 17349 50 267401379781 112358 2412 360 78 — — — — — —
202423 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9580 15200 11293 12 188309212521 25288 3112 255 19 — — — — — —
202524 A+Winston-Salem Dash — 6458 5000 2184 10 8617286258 125 283 138 -43 — — — — — —
202625 AABirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 162 11 235350294644 59364 305 308 56 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
202120 ROK MLEFCL Blue Jays — 4236 5110 2102 01 139225222447 83162 245 195 18 — — — — — —
202221 A MLEDunedin Blue Jays — 10387 16301 6367 01 184290253543 69249 356 234 45 — — — — — —
202221 ROK MLEFCL Blue Jays — 4337 6100 3133 00 162279189468 27238 307 213 30 — — — — — —
202322 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 143121 26502 12469 50 215331306637 91315 328 284 78 — — — — — —
202423 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9583 12100 8403 12 145245157401 12268 428 196 19 — — — — — —
202524 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 6459 4000 1254 10 6814168208 117 392 104 -43 — — — — — —
202625 AA MLEBirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 172 11 235350294644 59333 355 251 56 — — — — — —
202120 ROK MLEFCL Blue Jays — 4236 5110 2102 01 139225222447 83179 245 195 18 — — — — — —
202120 ROK RAWFCL Blue Jays — 4234 6110 472 01 176300265565 88207 1710 257 18 — — — — — —
202221 A MLE2 teams — 146124 21401 94910 01 169280226506 56260 346 228 40 — — — — — —
202221 A RAW2 teams — 146120 25501 133610 01 208336275611 67279 259 288 40 — — — — — —
202322 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 143121 26502 12469 50 215331306637 91324 328 284 78 — — — — — —
202322 A RAWKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 143116 31702 17349 50 267401379781 112358 2412 360 78 — — — — — —
202423 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9583 12100 8403 12 145245157401 12273 428 196 19 — — — — — —
202423 A RAWKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9580 15200 11293 12 188309212521 25288 3112 255 19 — — — — — —
202524 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 6459 4000 1254 10 6814168208 118 392 104 -43 — — — — — —
202524 A+ RAWWinston-Salem Dash — 6458 5000 2184 10 8617286258 125 283 138 -43 — — — — — —
202625 AA MLEBirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 172 11 235350294644 59400 355 251 56 — — — — — —
202625 AA RAWBirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 162 11 235350294644 59364 305 308 56 — — — — — —
202120 ROK MLEFCL Blue Jays — 4238 5110 2102 01 132225211436 79162 245 195 18 — — — — — —
202221 A MLE2 teams — 146126 21401 94910 01 167280222502 56246 346 228 40 — — — — — —
202322 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 143121 26502 12469 50 215331306637 91315 328 284 78 — — — — — —
202423 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9584 12100 8403 12 143245155399 12268 428 196 19 — — — — — —
202524 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 6459 4000 1254 10 6814168208 117 392 104 -43 — — — — — —
202625 AA MLEBirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 172 11 235350294644 59333 355 251 56 — — — — — —
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
202423 A MLEKannapolis Cannon Ballers — 9584 12100 8403 12 143245155399 12268 428 196 19 — — — — — —
202524 A+ MLEWinston-Salem Dash — 6459 4000 1254 10 6814168208 117 392 104 -43 — — — — — —
202625 AA MLEBirmingham Barons — 2017 4100 172 11 235350294644 59333 355 251 56 — — — — — —
▸ 2027 season
▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability)
202726 MLB MLECWS 2% 200181 36613 13634 31 200268292560 92285 326 256 59 -10 +0 +0 +4 +4 0.0
▸ 2027 — real world (MLB)
202726 MLB CTXCWS 2% 22 0000 010 00 201269294563 93286 500 257 59 -0 +0 +0 +0 +0 -0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%)
202827 MLB MLECWS 27% 130118 24412 9402 21 201270295565 94285 317 258 61 -6 +0 +0 +2 +3 -0.1
202827 MLB CTXCWS 27% 3532 7101 2111 10 202271297568 95286 316 259 61 -2 +0 +0 +1 +1 -0.0
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— A+C — 3532 7101 2111 10 219286344629 125300 316 259 43 -2 +0 +0 +1 +1 -0.0
/ 162G— A+C — 650594 13119019 3720419 190 221288348636 128302 316 259 43 -30 +4 +0 +12 +14 -0.1
Career— MLE — 724634 1111926 4824334 116 175270240509 65267 347 231 43 -10 +0 +0 +4 +5 -0.2
/ 162G— MLE — 650569 991725 4321831 105 174269237506 63266 347 231 43 -31 +1 +0 +12 +14 -0.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AABirmingham Barons · 20 PAwOBA .301 → .251 (−50)K% 30.0% → 36.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.00%÷1.000×1.220——36.60%
BB% (unintentional) /PA5.00%÷1.000×0.680—×0.9983.39%
HBP% /PA10.00%—×0.840—×0.9988.38%
Singles /BIP27.27%÷1.000×0.920—×0.99825.04%
Doubles /BIP9.09%÷1.000×0.910—×0.9988.26%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.880—×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.800—×0.9980.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .301 → .251; ISO .059 → .050; BABIP .364 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 64 PAwOBA .135 → .104 (−31)K% 28.1% → 38.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA28.12%÷0.955×1.310——38.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA3.12%÷0.949×0.600—×0.9881.95%
HBP% /PA6.25%—×0.770—×0.9884.75%
Singles /BIP12.50%÷0.942×0.870×1.030×0.98811.75%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷0.984×0.780×1.030×0.9880.00%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.045×0.850×1.030×0.9880.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.923×0.880—×0.9880.00%

Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 88, 2B 97, 3B 109, K 91, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .135 → .104; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .125 → .117. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 95 PAwOBA .252 → .196 (−56)K% 30.5% → 41.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.53%÷0.990×1.360——41.93%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.58%÷0.957×0.690—×0.9908.26%
HBP% /PA3.16%—×0.780—×0.9902.44%
Singles /BIP25.49%÷0.980×0.920×1.022×0.99024.23%
Doubles /BIP3.92%÷1.056×0.830×1.022×0.9903.12%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.910×1.022×0.9900.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.820×0.800—×0.9900.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 96, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 98, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .252 → .196; ISO .025 → .018; BABIP .288 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 143 PAwOBA .354 → .284 (−71)K% 23.8% → 32.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA23.78%÷1.004×1.360——32.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.89%÷0.951×0.690——8.63%
HBP% /PA6.29%—×0.780——4.91%
Singles /BIP26.83%÷1.002×0.920×0.993—24.45%
Doubles /BIP8.54%÷1.050×0.830×0.993—6.70%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.988×0.910×0.993—0.00%
Home runs /BIP2.44%÷0.861×0.800——2.27%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 100, 2B 110, 3B 98, K 101, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.993.

Result: wOBA .354 → .284; ISO .112 → .090; BABIP .358 → .315. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ADunedin Blue Jays · 103 PAwOBA .284 → .234 (−50)K% 26.2% → 35.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA26.21%÷1.017×1.360——35.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.74%÷1.050×0.690—×1.0155.83%
HBP% /PA6.80%—×0.780—×1.0155.38%
Singles /BIP22.81%÷1.005×0.920×1.008×1.01521.35%
Doubles /BIP5.26%÷0.983×0.830×1.008×1.0154.55%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.910×1.008×1.0150.00%
Home runs /BIP1.75%÷0.916×0.800—×1.0151.55%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 101, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 103, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.

Result: wOBA .284 → .234; ISO .071 → .061; BABIP .271 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKFCL Blue Jays · 43 PAwOBA .295 → .213 (−83)K% 20.9% → 29.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA20.93%÷1.013×1.440——29.76%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.30%÷0.970×0.620—×0.9855.86%
HBP% /PA6.98%—×0.720—×0.9854.95%
Singles /BIP22.22%÷0.981×0.820—×0.98518.30%
Doubles /BIP7.41%÷0.953×0.720—×0.9855.51%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.720—×0.9850.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.904×0.780—×0.9850.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 81, 1B 96, 2B 91, 3B 80, K 103, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .295 → .213; ISO .056 → .039; BABIP .296 → .238. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKFCL Blue Jays · 42 PAwOBA .263 → .195 (−68)K% 16.7% → 24.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.67%÷1.000×1.440——24.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.52%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9955.88%
HBP% /PA4.76%—×0.720—×0.9953.41%
Singles /BIP14.81%÷1.000×0.820—×0.99512.09%
Doubles /BIP3.70%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9952.65%
Triples /BIP3.70%÷1.000×0.720—×0.9952.65%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9950.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .263 → .195; ISO .088 → .066; BABIP .207 → .162. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).