Jake Washer
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 25 | A+CHC | 174 | .164/.231/.233 | 2 | 2 | -9 | — | .123/.173/.178 |
| 2022 | 26 | AA/A+2 orgs | 254 | .269/.324/.530 | 17 | 1 | 68 | — | .202/.245/.396 |
| 2023 | 27 | AAACHC | 75 | .167/.200/.306 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — | .137/.160/.260 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 25 | A+ | South Bend Cubs | — | 174 | 159 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 164 | 231 | 233 | 464 | 69 | 235 | 32 | 7 | 216 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 65 | 64 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 200 | 328 | 528 | 141 | 257 | 40 | 2 | 232 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | A+ | South Bend Cubs | — | 189 | 170 | 51 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 15 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 300 | 367 | 606 | 973 | 306 | 352 | 28 | 8 | 418 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA | Iowa Cubs | — | 75 | 72 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 167 | 200 | 306 | 506 | 139 | 212 | 25 | 4 | 223 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 25 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 174 | 163 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 73 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 173 | 178 | 351 | 55 | 201 | 42 | 5 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 65 | 64 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 141 | 154 | 234 | 388 | 94 | 234 | 51 | 2 | 159 | -6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 189 | 175 | 39 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 66 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 277 | 451 | 728 | 229 | 278 | 35 | 5 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | — | 75 | 73 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 137 | 160 | 260 | 420 | 123 | 186 | 29 | 3 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 25 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 174 | 163 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 73 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 173 | 178 | 351 | 55 | 205 | 42 | 5 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 25 | A+ RAW | South Bend Cubs | — | 174 | 159 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 164 | 231 | 233 | 464 | 69 | 235 | 32 | 7 | 216 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 254 | 239 | 48 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 99 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 201 | 245 | 393 | 638 | 192 | 273 | 39 | 4 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 254 | 234 | 63 | 10 | 0 | 17 | 16 | 78 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 269 | 324 | 530 | 854 | 261 | 329 | 31 | 6 | 371 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | — | 75 | 73 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 137 | 160 | 260 | 420 | 123 | 180 | 29 | 3 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA RAW | Iowa Cubs | — | 75 | 72 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 167 | 200 | 306 | 506 | 139 | 212 | 25 | 4 | 223 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 25 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 174 | 162 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 73 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 173 | 179 | 352 | 56 | 201 | 42 | 5 | 155 | -9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 26 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 254 | 238 | 48 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 99 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 202 | 245 | 395 | 640 | 193 | 267 | 39 | 4 | 269 | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 27 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | — | 75 | 73 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 137 | 160 | 260 | 420 | 123 | 186 | 29 | 3 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 503 | 475 | 78 | 14 | 1 | 16 | 22 | 194 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 164 | 208 | 299 | 507 | 135 | 233 | 39 | 4 | 215 | 32 | -41 | +1 | +0 | +9 | +11 | -2.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 614 | 101 | 18 | 1 | 21 | 28 | 251 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 164 | 207 | 300 | 506 | 135 | 233 | 39 | 4 | 215 | 32 | -53 | +1 | +0 | +12 | +14 | -2.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAAIowa Cubs · 75 PAwOBA .217 → .174 (−42)K% 25.3% → 29.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.33% | ÷1.019 | ×1.200 | — | — | 29.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.00% | ÷1.014 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 2.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 9.43% | ÷1.025 | ×0.930 | ×1.015 | ×1.003 | 8.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.43% | ÷1.049 | ×0.830 | ×1.015 | ×1.003 | 7.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.89% | ÷0.916 | ×0.970 | ×1.015 | ×1.003 | 2.04% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.89% | ÷0.965 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 1.37% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 105, 2B 110, 3B 83, K 104, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.
Result: wOBA .217 → .174; ISO .139 → .111; BABIP .212 → .186. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+South Bend Cubs · 189 PAwOBA .408 → .307 (−102)K% 27.5% → 34.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.51% | ÷1.003 | ×1.270 | — | — | 34.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.94% | ÷0.986 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.968 | 5.53% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.59% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.968 | 1.21% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.88% | ÷1.010 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 19.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.47% | ÷1.020 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 6.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.097 | ×0.850 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 11.86% | ÷0.938 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.968 | 9.80% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 102, 2B 104, 3B 119, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .408 → .307; ISO .306 → .231; BABIP .352 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AATennessee Smokies · 65 PAwOBA .225 → .159 (−66)K% 40.0% → 51.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 40.00% | ÷0.958 | ×1.220 | — | — | 50.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 1.54% | ÷0.940 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.988 | 1.10% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.68% | ÷0.982 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 21.93% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.929 | ×0.910 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.973 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.89% | ÷1.010 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 6.18% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 96, 2B 86, 3B 95, K 92, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .225 → .159; ISO .141 → .090; BABIP .257 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+South Bend Cubs · 174 PAwOBA .211 → .155 (−56)K% 31.6% → 42.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.61% | ÷1.012 | ×1.350 | — | — | 42.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.47% | ÷0.968 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 5.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.57% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.978 | 0.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.27% | ÷0.990 | ×0.910 | ×0.985 | ×0.978 | 16.17% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.81% | ÷1.080 | ×0.830 | ×0.985 | ×0.978 | 3.56% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.820 | ×0.985 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.92% | ÷0.928 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.978 | 1.68% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 98, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 102, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .211 → .155; ISO .069 → .049; BABIP .235 → .201. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).