Deretd Parra
P Lynchburg Hillcats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22 | ROKDSL TEX Blue | 15 | 6 | 43 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 26.2% | 7.6% | — | K 17.8% · BB 9.4% · FIP 2.79 | |
| 2023 | 23 | ROKDSL Rangers R… | 17 | 0 | 27 | 2.67 | 2.58 | 29.6% | 16.0% | — | K 20.1% · BB 20.0% · FIP 3.93 | |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 0 | 45 | 3.57 | 2.20 | 24.3% | 9.4% | — | K 14.0% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.48 | |
| 2025 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCLE | — | — | 0 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 21.8% | 10.3% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 28 | MLBCLE | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.59 | 4.63 | 21.8% | 10.3% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers 1 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 69 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 50% | 2.8 | 16.8% | 10.9% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 4.32 | 5.29 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Rangers 1 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 69 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 50% | 2.8 | 24.6% | 8.7% | 15.9% | 2.9% | 4.32 | 3.70 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers 2 | 16 | 6 | 39 | 169 | 33 | 24 | 2 | 38% | 2.5 | 13.3% | 17.8% | -4.5% | 1.4% | 2.29 | 5.01 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | DSL Rangers 2 | 16 | 6 | 39 | 169 | 33 | 24 | 2 | 38% | 2.5 | 19.5% | 14.2% | 5.3% | 1.2% | 2.29 | 3.91 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK MLE | DSL TEX Blue | 15 | 6 | 43 | 172 | 45 | 13 | 0 | 40% | 2.9 | 17.8% | 9.4% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 1.87 | 2.79 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | ROK RAW | DSL TEX Blue | 15 | 6 | 43 | 172 | 45 | 13 | 0 | 40% | 2.9 | 26.2% | 7.6% | 18.6% | 0.0% | 1.87 | 1.92 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers Red | 17 | 0 | 27 | 125 | 37 | 20 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 20.1% | 20.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 2.67 | 3.93 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | ROK RAW | DSL Rangers Red | 17 | 0 | 27 | 125 | 37 | 20 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 29.6% | 16.0% | 13.6% | 0.0% | 2.67 | 2.58 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 0 | 45 | 202 | 49 | 19 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 14.0% | 12.3% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 3.57 | 3.48 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 0 | 45 | 202 | 49 | 19 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 14.0% | 12.3% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 3.57 | 3.48 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 0 | 45 | 202 | 49 | 19 | 0 | 0% | 1.7 | 24.3% | 9.4% | 14.9% | 0.0% | 3.57 | 2.20 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | CLE | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.8% | 10.3% | 11.5% | 3.0% | 4.57 | 4.57 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 17 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 10.3% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.59 | 4.63 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 10.3% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.59 | 4.63 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 10.3% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.59 | 4.25 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 190 | 95 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 10.3% | 11.5% | 3.1% | 4.59 | 4.25 | +0.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 81 | 15 | 172 | 737 | 118 | 104 | 5 | 19% | 2.1 | 16.0% | 14.1% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 2.78 | 3.92 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 94 | 17 | 200 | 859 | 138 | 121 | 6 | 19% | 2.1 | 16.0% | 14.1% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 2.78 | 3.92 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ALynchburg Hillcats · 34 IPFIP 2.82 → 3.48 (+0.65)K% 19.0% → 14.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.95% | — | ×0.740 | 14.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.46% | — | ×1.180 | 12.34% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.844 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 2.82 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKACL Guardians · 11 IPFIP 0.43 → 1.73 (+1.30)K% 40.8% → 27.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.82% | — | ×0.680 | 27.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.12% | — | ×1.250 | 7.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.984 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 0.43 → 1.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Rangers Red · 27 IPFIP 2.63 → 3.93 (+1.31)K% 29.6% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.60% | — | ×0.680 | 20.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.00% | — | ×1.250 | 20.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.056 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 2.63 → 3.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL TEX Blue · 43 IPFIP 1.85 → 2.79 (+0.95)K% 26.2% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.16% | — | ×0.680 | 17.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.56% | — | ×1.250 | 9.45% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.148 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 130).
Result: FIP 1.85 → 2.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Rangers 2 · 39 IPFIP 3.90 → 5.01 (+1.11)K% 19.5% → 13.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.53% | — | ×0.680 | 13.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.20% | — | ×1.250 | 17.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.18% | ÷1.163 | ×1.400 | 1.42% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 133).
Result: FIP 3.90 → 5.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKDSL Rangers 1 · 17 IPFIP 3.71 → 5.29 (+1.58)K% 24.6% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.64% | — | ×0.680 | 16.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.70% | — | ×1.250 | 10.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.90% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 4.06% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 5.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).