JT Schwartz
1B Binghamton Rumble Ponies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | AAA/AANYM | 440 | .263/.362/.406 | 10 | 9 | 83 | — | .231/.310/.346 |
| 2025 | 25 | AANYM | 335 | .205/.314/.332 | 5 | 0 | 55 | — | .183/.265/.288 |
| 2026 | 26 | AANYM | 296 | .220/.313/.398 | 10 | 2 | 51 | — | .175/.245/.301 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 27 | MLBNYM | 3 | .189/.263/.304 | 0 | 0 | 65 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ27% MLB | 28 | MLBNYM | 55 | .189/.264/.303 | 1 | 0 | 65 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 40 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | A | St. Lucie Mets | — | 100 | 82 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 195 | 327 | 256 | 583 | 61 | 222 | 12 | 13 | 277 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ | Brooklyn Cyclones | — | 455 | 400 | 109 | 25 | 4 | 6 | 46 | 89 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 273 | 358 | 400 | 758 | 128 | 336 | 20 | 10 | 341 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 277 | 245 | 74 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 46 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 302 | 383 | 437 | 819 | 135 | 359 | 17 | 10 | 368 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | INTL | Glendale Desert Dogs | — | 83 | 73 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 247 | 329 | 411 | 740 | 164 | 308 | 24 | 7 | 329 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA | Syracuse Mets | — | 178 | 160 | 35 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 219 | 290 | 381 | 671 | 162 | 234 | 16 | 6 | 298 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 262 | 217 | 64 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 41 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 295 | 412 | 424 | 836 | 129 | 341 | 16 | 15 | 377 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 283 | 58 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 57 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 205 | 314 | 332 | 646 | 127 | 233 | 17 | 12 | 292 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 259 | 57 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 77 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 220 | 313 | 398 | 711 | 178 | 270 | 26 | 10 | 317 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 100 | 86 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 163 | 265 | 209 | 475 | 47 | 195 | 17 | 9 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | Brooklyn Cyclones | — | 455 | 420 | 87 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 117 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 207 | 265 | 307 | 572 | 100 | 270 | 26 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 277 | 254 | 68 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 56 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 268 | 329 | 374 | 703 | 106 | 328 | 20 | 6 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AAA MLE | Syracuse Mets | — | 178 | 162 | 29 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 36 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 179 | 244 | 290 | 534 | 111 | 204 | 20 | 4 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 262 | 229 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 48 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 266 | 354 | 384 | 738 | 118 | 311 | 18 | 10 | 325 | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 295 | 54 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 183 | 265 | 288 | 553 | 105 | 215 | 20 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 269 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 94 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 175 | 245 | 301 | 546 | 126 | 232 | 32 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 100 | 86 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 163 | 265 | 209 | 475 | 47 | 197 | 17 | 9 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A RAW | St. Lucie Mets | — | 100 | 82 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 195 | 327 | 256 | 583 | 61 | 222 | 12 | 13 | 277 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | Brooklyn Cyclones | — | 455 | 420 | 87 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 117 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 207 | 265 | 307 | 572 | 100 | 271 | 26 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ RAW | Brooklyn Cyclones | — | 455 | 400 | 109 | 25 | 4 | 6 | 46 | 89 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 273 | 358 | 400 | 758 | 128 | 336 | 20 | 10 | 341 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 360 | 327 | 87 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 73 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 266 | 331 | 370 | 702 | 104 | 331 | 20 | 7 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 360 | 318 | 92 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 66 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 289 | 370 | 431 | 801 | 142 | 348 | 18 | 9 | 359 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 440 | 391 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 35 | 84 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 230 | 310 | 345 | 655 | 115 | 271 | 19 | 8 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 440 | 377 | 99 | 22 | 1 | 10 | 49 | 70 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 263 | 362 | 406 | 768 | 143 | 296 | 16 | 11 | 345 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 295 | 54 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 183 | 265 | 288 | 553 | 105 | 218 | 20 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 283 | 58 | 19 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 57 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 205 | 314 | 332 | 646 | 127 | 233 | 17 | 12 | 292 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 269 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 94 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 175 | 245 | 301 | 546 | 126 | 235 | 32 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 259 | 57 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 77 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 220 | 313 | 398 | 711 | 178 | 270 | 26 | 10 | 317 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21 | A MLE | St. Lucie Mets | — | 100 | 88 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 159 | 265 | 205 | 470 | 45 | 195 | 17 | 9 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A+ MLE | Brooklyn Cyclones | — | 455 | 419 | 87 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 117 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 208 | 265 | 308 | 573 | 100 | 270 | 26 | 6 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 360 | 325 | 87 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 73 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 268 | 331 | 372 | 704 | 105 | 328 | 20 | 7 | 307 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 440 | 392 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 35 | 84 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 230 | 310 | 344 | 654 | 115 | 268 | 19 | 8 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 299 | 54 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 181 | 265 | 284 | 550 | 104 | 215 | 20 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 269 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 94 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 175 | 245 | 301 | 546 | 126 | 232 | 32 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 440 | 392 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 35 | 84 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 230 | 310 | 344 | 654 | 115 | 268 | 19 | 8 | 291 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 25 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 335 | 299 | 54 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 181 | 265 | 284 | 550 | 104 | 215 | 20 | 8 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | — | 296 | 269 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 20 | 94 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 175 | 245 | 301 | 546 | 126 | 232 | 32 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYM | 2% | 346 | 312 | 60 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 101 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 195 | 269 | 313 | 582 | 118 | 261 | 29 | 8 | 264 | 65 | -15 | +0 | +0 | -6 | +7 | -0.5 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYM | 2% | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 189 | 263 | 304 | 567 | 115 | 252 | 33 | 0 | 258 | 65 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | NYM | 27% | 204 | 183 | 36 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 59 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 195 | 269 | 312 | 582 | 117 | 261 | 29 | 8 | 264 | 65 | -9 | -0 | -1 | -4 | +4 | -0.9 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | NYM | 27% | 55 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 189 | 264 | 303 | 567 | 114 | 253 | 29 | 7 | 258 | 65 | -2 | +0 | -0 | -1 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 55 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 255 | 280 | 535 | 100 | 242 | 29 | 7 | 258 | 67 | -2 | +0 | -0 | -1 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 591 | 107 | 24 | 0 | 12 | 47 | 189 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 181 | 255 | 283 | 538 | 102 | 244 | 29 | 7 | 258 | 67 | -27 | +0 | -2 | -12 | +14 | -2.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2345 | 2111 | 442 | 101 | 10 | 36 | 169 | 557 | 44 | 23 | 9 | 209 | 282 | 318 | 600 | 108 | 264 | 24 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -15 | -0 | -1 | -6 | +8 | -1.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 585 | 123 | 28 | 3 | 10 | 47 | 154 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 210 | 283 | 320 | 602 | 109 | 265 | 24 | 7 | 267 | 67 | -27 | -1 | -1 | -12 | +14 | -2.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 296 PAwOBA .311 → .244 (−67)K% 26.0% → 31.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.01% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 31.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.978 | 6.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.69% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.978 | 1.40% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.58% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | ×0.952 | ×0.978 | 15.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.860 | ×0.952 | ×0.978 | 6.16% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.55% | ÷1.000 | ×0.950 | ×0.952 | ×0.978 | 0.49% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.978 | 4.19% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.
Result: wOBA .311 → .244; ISO .178 → .135; BABIP .270 → .232. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 335 PAwOBA .290 → .250 (−40)K% 17.0% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.01% | ÷1.015 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.64% | ÷0.983 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.988 | 8.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.79% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 1.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.60% | ÷0.982 | ×0.970 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 13.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.41% | ÷0.941 | ×0.860 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 7.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.44% | ÷0.911 | ×0.950 | ×0.973 | ×0.988 | 0.44% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.21% | ÷0.990 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.988 | 1.72% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 96, 2B 88, 3B 82, K 103, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .290 → .250; ISO .127 → .111; BABIP .233 → .215. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 262 PAwOBA .371 → .325 (−46)K% 15.6% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.65% | ÷1.046 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.89% | ÷0.996 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 10.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.53% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.998 | 1.30% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.70% | ÷0.992 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 24.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.25% | ÷0.954 | ×0.860 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 5.34% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.57% | ÷1.062 | ×0.950 | ×0.950 | ×0.998 | 0.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.84% | ÷0.834 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.998 | 2.65% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 67, 1B 98, 2B 91, 3B 112, K 109, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .371 → .325; ISO .129 → .121; BABIP .341 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAASyracuse Mets · 178 PAwOBA .294 → .241 (−53)K% 16.3% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.29% | ÷0.968 | ×1.200 | — | — | 20.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.62% | ÷0.933 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 4.29% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.37% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 3.27% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.50% | ÷1.006 | ×0.930 | ×0.950 | ×1.033 | 13.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.40% | ÷0.972 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.033 | 7.04% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×0.950 | ×1.033 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.82% | ÷1.059 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.033 | 2.61% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 101, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 94, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .294 → .241; ISO .163 → .119; BABIP .234 → .204. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 277 PAwOBA .358 → .307 (−50)K% 16.6% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.61% | ÷1.002 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.39% | ÷1.015 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 6.55% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.81% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 1.55% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.63% | ÷0.993 | ×0.970 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 24.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.54% | ÷1.032 | ×0.860 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 6.95% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.01% | ÷1.150 | ×0.950 | ×0.965 | ×1.012 | 0.81% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.01% | ÷0.925 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 1.72% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 99, 2B 106, 3B 130, K 100, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.
Result: wOBA .358 → .307; ISO .135 → .111; BABIP .359 → .328. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Brooklyn Cyclones · 455 PAwOBA .333 → .252 (−81)K% 19.6% → 25.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.56% | ÷0.995 | ×1.310 | — | — | 25.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.89% | ÷1.020 | ×0.600 | — | ×0.998 | 5.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.54% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.998 | 1.18% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.79% | ÷1.026 | ×0.870 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 19.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.04% | ÷1.030 | ×0.780 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 5.95% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.29% | ÷1.060 | ×0.850 | ×0.979 | ×0.998 | 1.01% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.93% | ÷0.925 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 1.83% |
Factors used: league row South Atlantic League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 105, 2B 106, 3B 112, K 99, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .333 → .252; ISO .128 → .103; BABIP .336 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ASt. Lucie Mets · 100 PAwOBA .276 → .224 (−52)K% 12.0% → 17.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.00% | ÷0.945 | ×1.360 | — | — | 17.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.00% | ÷1.041 | ×0.690 | — | — | 8.62% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 2.34% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.71% | ÷1.028 | ×0.920 | ×0.985 | — | 13.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷0.935 | ×0.830 | ×0.985 | — | 6.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.137 | ×0.910 | ×0.985 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.988 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 106, 2B 87, 3B 127, K 89, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.
Result: wOBA .276 → .224; ISO .061 → .055; BABIP .222 → .195. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .