Carlos Franco

Pos1B

B/TL/R

Born1991-12-20

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLPROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR
2023	31	INTLGigantes del …	92	.319/.467/.528	3	185	—
2024	32	INTLGigantes del …	90	.296/.433/.493	4	165	—
2025	33	INTLGigantes del …	72	.172/.324/.276	2	79	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	17	ROK	DSL Braves	—	95	83	15	4	1	1	10	30	1	0	3	181	277	289	566	108	264	32	11	260	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK	GCL Braves	—	240	207	39	5	1	4	26	55	5	4	0	188	294	280	574	92	233	23	11	268	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK	GCL Braves	—	170	155	37	9	1	1	15	38	0	10	0	239	306	329	635	90	310	22	9	290	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK	Danville Braves	—	206	166	45	6	3	2	37	36	2	6	5	271	410	380	789	108	333	17	18	363	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A	Rome Braves	—	510	454	104	20	1	1	51	124	1	15	9	229	308	284	592	55	310	24	10	274	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A	Rome Braves	—	491	443	113	20	4	9	45	84	1	7	2	255	325	379	704	124	296	17	9	316	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+	Carolina Mudcats	—	530	461	117	30	3	11	66	108	1	5	5	254	348	403	752	150	308	20	12	338	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	482	424	108	14	3	4	53	134	2	3	4	255	340	330	670	75	361	28	11	308	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	INTL	Toros del Este	—	124	108	27	7	0	2	14	22	0	1	0	250	336	370	706	120	294	18	11	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	347	311	72	11	0	10	34	97	2	1	0	232	311	363	675	132	304	28	10	306	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	165	150	44	7	0	11	14	45	1	0	0	293	358	560	918	267	351	27	8	399	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	INTL	Toros del Este	—	76	67	15	5	0	1	9	22	0	0	0	224	316	343	659	119	318	29	12	302	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA	Gwinnett Stripers	—	485	437	109	22	1	16	42	153	0	1	1	249	315	414	729	165	339	32	9	321	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	INTL	Toros del Este	—	95	86	22	2	1	1	8	28	1	0	0	256	326	337	664	81	368	29	8	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	120	99	26	5	0	1	19	23	1	7	2	263	387	343	730	81	329	19	16	338	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	33	28	8	2	0	0	5	8	0	2	0	286	394	357	751	71	400	24	15	348	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	17	14	3	0	0	0	3	5	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		333	29	18	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	92	72	23	6	0	3	20	17	0	0	0	319	467	528	995	208	385	18	22	441	185	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	32	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	90	71	21	2	0	4	17	17	1	0	0	296	433	493	926	197	340	19	19	412	165	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	58	10	0	0	2	13	22	0	0	0	172	324	276	600	103	229	31	18	284	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	95	86	9	2	1	0	7	37	1	0	3	105	181	151	332	47	179	39	7	166	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	240	217	29	3	1	3	16	79	5	4	0	134	210	198	408	65	182	33	7	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	170	161	28	6	1	1	9	55	0	10	0	174	218	242	460	68	249	32	5	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	206	181	39	5	2	2	22	51	2	6	5	215	307	298	606	83	281	25	11	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	510	475	94	16	1	1	30	168	1	15	9	198	247	242	489	44	296	33	6	220	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	491	458	101	17	4	8	30	116	1	7	2	221	270	328	597	107	276	24	6	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	Carolina Mudcats	—	530	488	101	23	2	9	39	152	1	5	5	207	267	318	585	111	278	29	7	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	482	442	99	12	2	3	35	157	2	3	4	224	284	281	564	57	336	33	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	347	322	65	10	0	8	23	118	2	1	0	202	259	307	567	106	288	34	7	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	165	156	37	6	0	9	8	57	1	0	0	237	279	449	728	212	319	35	5	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	485	450	94	18	1	13	29	193	0	1	1	209	257	340	597	131	311	40	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	95	86	9	2	1	0	7	37	1	0	3	105	181	151	332	47	180	39	7	166	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK RAW	DSL Braves	—	95	83	15	4	1	1	10	30	1	0	3	181	277	289	566	108	264	32	11	260	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	240	217	29	3	1	3	16	79	5	4	0	134	210	198	408	65	190	33	7	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK RAW	GCL Braves	—	240	207	39	5	1	4	26	55	5	4	0	188	294	280	574	92	233	23	11	268	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	170	161	28	6	1	1	9	55	0	10	0	174	218	242	460	68	257	32	5	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK RAW	GCL Braves	—	170	155	37	9	1	1	15	38	0	10	0	239	306	329	635	90	310	22	9	290	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	206	181	39	5	2	2	22	51	2	6	5	215	307	298	606	83	287	25	11	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK RAW	Danville Braves	—	206	166	45	6	3	2	37	36	2	6	5	271	410	380	789	108	333	17	18	363	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	510	475	94	16	1	1	30	168	1	15	9	198	247	242	489	44	301	33	6	220	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A RAW	Rome Braves	—	510	454	104	20	1	1	51	124	1	15	9	229	308	284	592	55	310	24	10	274	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	491	458	101	17	4	8	30	116	1	7	2	221	270	328	597	107	278	24	6	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A RAW	Rome Braves	—	491	443	113	20	4	9	45	84	1	7	2	255	325	379	704	124	296	17	9	316	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	Carolina Mudcats	—	530	488	101	23	2	9	39	152	1	5	5	207	267	318	585	111	280	29	7	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ RAW	Carolina Mudcats	—	530	461	117	30	3	11	66	108	1	5	5	254	348	403	752	150	308	20	12	338	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	606	555	125	15	3	4	44	197	2	4	4	225	285	285	569	59	339	33	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	606	532	135	21	3	6	67	156	2	4	4	254	339	338	678	85	346	26	11	309	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	588	550	119	19	0	20	35	200	3	1	0	216	267	360	627	144	300	34	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	588	528	131	23	0	22	57	164	3	1	0	248	325	417	741	169	319	28	10	332	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	580	539	111	21	1	15	34	231	1	1	1	206	254	332	586	126	321	40	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	580	523	131	24	2	17	50	181	1	1	1	250	317	402	719	151	344	31	9	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL MLE	Tigres del Licey	—	120	99	26	5	0	1	19	23	1	7	2	263	387	343	730	81	329	19	16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL RAW	Tigres del Licey	—	120	99	26	5	0	1	19	23	1	7	2	263	387	343	730	81	329	19	16	338	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL MLE	Tigres del Licey	—	33	28	8	2	0	0	5	8	0	2	0	286	394	357	751	71	400	24	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL RAW	Tigres del Licey	—	33	28	8	2	0	0	5	8	0	2	0	286	394	357	751	71	400	24	15	348	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL MLE	Tigres del Licey	—	17	14	3	0	0	0	3	5	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		333	29	18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL RAW	Tigres del Licey	—	17	14	3	0	0	0	3	5	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		333	29	18	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	92	72	23	6	0	3	20	17	0	0	0	319	467	528	995	208	385	18	22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	92	72	23	6	0	3	20	17	0	0	0	319	467	528	995	208	385	18	22	441	185	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	32	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	90	71	21	2	0	4	17	17	1	0	0	296	433	493	926	197	340	19	19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	32	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	90	71	21	2	0	4	17	17	1	0	0	296	433	493	926	197	340	19	19	412	165	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	58	10	0	0	2	13	22	0	0	0	172	324	276	600	103	229	31	18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	58	10	0	0	2	13	22	0	0	0	172	324	276	600	103	229	31	18	284	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	17	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	95	87	9	2	1	0	7	37	1	0	3	103	181	149	330	46	179	39	7	166	-1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	18	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	240	217	29	3	1	3	16	79	5	4	0	134	210	198	408	65	182	33	7	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	170	159	28	6	1	1	9	55	0	10	0	176	218	245	463	69	249	32	5	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	206	180	39	5	2	2	22	51	2	6	5	217	307	300	607	83	281	25	11	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	510	474	94	16	1	1	30	168	1	15	9	198	247	243	490	44	296	33	6	220	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	491	457	101	17	4	8	30	116	1	7	2	221	270	328	598	107	276	24	6	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	Carolina Mudcats	—	530	485	101	23	2	9	39	152	1	5	5	208	267	320	587	111	278	29	7	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	606	555	125	15	3	4	44	197	2	4	4	225	285	285	569	59	336	33	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	588	545	119	19	0	20	35	200	3	1	0	218	267	363	630	145	298	34	6	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	580	540	111	21	1	15	34	231	1	1	1	206	254	331	586	126	311	40	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4440	4052	847	142	16	73	343	1378	19	62	31	209	274	306	580	97	295	31	8	224	38	-330	+0	+0	-79	+96	-31.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	593	124	21	2	11	50	202	3	9	5	209	274	307	581	98	295	31	8	224	38	-48	-0	+0	-12	+14	-4.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 485 PAwOBA .314 → .258 (−56)K% 31.5% → 39.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.55%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	39.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.04%	÷0.947	×0.690	—	×1.003	5.88%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.65%	÷1.010	×0.930	×1.025	×1.003	23.33%
Doubles /BIP	7.75%	÷0.995	×0.830	×1.025	×1.003	6.64%
Triples /BIP	0.35%	÷1.116	×0.970	×1.025	×1.003	0.31%
Home runs /BIP	5.63%	÷0.970	×0.840	—	×1.003	4.90%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 102, 2B 99, 3B 123, K 90, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .314 → .258; ISO .165 → .132; BABIP .339 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAGwinnett Braves · 347 PAwOBA .296 → .253 (−43)K% 28.0% → 33.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.95%	÷0.989	×1.200	—	—	33.92%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.22%	÷0.999	×0.690	—	×1.018	6.48%
HBP% /PA	0.58%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.55%
Singles /BIP	23.83%	÷1.005	×0.930	×1.021	×1.018	22.92%
Doubles /BIP	5.14%	÷0.936	×0.830	×1.021	×1.018	4.73%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.005	×0.970	×1.021	×1.018	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.67%	÷0.972	×0.840	—	×1.018	4.11%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 101, 2B 87, 3B 101, K 98, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.

Result: wOBA .296 → .253; ISO .132 → .112; BABIP .304 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAMississippi Braves · 165 PAwOBA .384 → .318 (−66)K% 27.3% → 34.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.27%	÷0.970	×1.220	—	—	34.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.27%	÷0.989	×0.680	—	×0.988	4.94%
HBP% /PA	0.61%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.50%
Singles /BIP	24.76%	÷1.026	×0.920	×1.027	×0.988	22.54%
Doubles /BIP	6.67%	÷0.951	×0.910	×1.027	×0.988	6.47%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.146	×0.880	×1.027	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	10.48%	÷0.925	×0.800	—	×0.988	8.96%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 105, 2B 90, 3B 129, K 94, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.027.

Result: wOBA .384 → .318; ISO .267 → .221; BABIP .351 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAMississippi Braves · 482 PAwOBA .301 → .256 (−45)K% 27.8% → 32.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.80%	÷1.043	×1.220	—	—	32.51%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.79%	÷0.997	×0.680	—	×0.998	7.34%
HBP% /PA	0.41%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.35%
Singles /BIP	30.00%	÷1.014	×0.920	×1.050	×0.998	28.51%
Doubles /BIP	4.83%	÷1.104	×0.910	×1.050	×0.998	4.17%
Triples /BIP	1.03%	÷1.150	×0.880	×1.050	×0.998	0.83%
Home runs /BIP	1.38%	÷1.084	×0.800	—	×0.998	1.02%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 103, 2B 121, 3B 130, K 109, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .301 → .256; ISO .075 → .060; BABIP .361 → .336. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Carolina Mudcats · 530 PAwOBA .330 → .260 (−70)K% 20.4% → 28.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.38%	÷1.012	×1.420	—	—	28.60%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.26%	÷1.042	×0.630	—	×0.988	7.33%
HBP% /PA	0.19%	—	×0.860	—	×0.988	0.16%
Singles /BIP	20.68%	÷1.014	×0.940	×1.045	×0.988	19.79%
Doubles /BIP	8.50%	÷1.083	×0.830	×1.045	×0.988	6.72%
Triples /BIP	0.85%	÷0.952	×0.800	×1.045	×0.988	0.74%
Home runs /BIP	3.12%	÷1.039	×0.900	—	×0.988	2.67%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 103, 2B 117, 3B 90, K 102, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.

Result: wOBA .330 → .260; ISO .150 → .119; BABIP .308 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ARome Braves · 491 PAwOBA .309 → .261 (−48)K% 17.1% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.11%	÷0.966	×1.340	—	—	23.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.16%	÷0.972	×0.660	—	×0.990	6.16%
HBP% /PA	0.20%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	0.16%
Singles /BIP	22.28%	÷1.012	×0.920	×1.050	×0.990	21.05%
Doubles /BIP	5.57%	÷0.965	×0.820	×1.050	×0.990	4.92%
Triples /BIP	1.11%	÷1.066	×0.940	×1.050	×0.990	1.02%
Home runs /BIP	2.51%	÷0.873	×0.820	—	×0.990	2.33%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 102, 2B 93, 3B 113, K 93, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .309 → .261; ISO .124 → .108; BABIP .296 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ARome Braves · 510 PAwOBA .268 → .220 (−48)K% 24.3% → 33.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.31%	÷0.988	×1.340	—	—	32.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.61%	÷1.068	×0.660	—	—	5.94%
HBP% /PA	0.20%	—	×0.770	—	—	0.15%
Singles /BIP	24.85%	÷0.987	×0.920	×1.050	—	24.32%
Doubles /BIP	6.06%	÷1.009	×0.820	×1.050	—	5.17%
Triples /BIP	0.30%	÷1.150	×0.940	×1.050	—	0.26%
Home runs /BIP	0.30%	÷0.856	×0.820	—	—	0.29%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 97, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 98, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .268 → .220; ISO .055 → .045; BABIP .310 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 ROKDanville Braves · 206 PAwOBA .353 → .272 (−82)K% 17.5% → 24.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.48%	÷1.000	×1.420	—	—	24.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	16.99%	÷1.000	×0.640	—	×0.985	10.71%
HBP% /PA	0.97%	—	×0.740	—	×0.985	0.71%
Singles /BIP	26.15%	÷1.000	×0.840	×1.050	×0.985	22.72%
Doubles /BIP	4.62%	÷1.000	×0.740	×1.050	×0.985	3.53%
Triples /BIP	2.31%	÷1.000	×0.740	×1.050	×0.985	1.77%
Home runs /BIP	1.54%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×0.985	1.21%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .353 → .272; ISO .108 → .085; BABIP .333 → .281. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .