Carlos Meza

P Hillsboro Hops
Age 26 LHP 6'1" / 155 lbs A+
Overview
A+PROSPECT
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202221AARI381676.313.9227.5%13.3%—K 20.3% · BB 15.7% · FIP 5.03
202322MIX2 levels400535.983.1926.6%13.3%—K 20.9% · BB 15.3% · FIP 4.24
202423MIX2 levels290295.834.4325.5%20.0%—K 20.6% · BB 19.5% · FIP 4.53
202524No MLB games played
202625No MLB games played
2027PROJ26MLBARI——04.714.7122.9%12.1%—
2028PROJ37% MLB27MLBARI6064.694.7122.9%11.9%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsHector Mercado (age 26) · Nick Hagadone (age 26) · Kevin Chapman (age 26)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 106115vR 123
ERA4.71
FIP4.71
K%22.9%
BB%12.1%
K-BB%10.8%
Proj IP14
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 14 IP
K: +0.1 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)+0KBB: -0.5 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-1BBCONTACT: -0.4 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.6 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.03 (14 IP)-0.0WAR
0.00.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201817ROK MLEDSL D-backs 215124100161807%1.610.9%22.5%-11.6%0.0%3.805.03—
201817ROK RAWDSL D-backs 215124100161807%1.616.0%18.0%-2.0%0.0%3.804.03—
201918ROK MLEDSL D-backs 213129126361808%2.319.4%17.9%1.6%0.0%4.913.72—
201918ROK RAWDSL D-backs 213129126361808%2.328.6%14.3%14.3%0.0%4.912.49—
202120ROK MLEACL D-backs117381844218464%3.515.5%12.2%3.3%3.1%4.975.03—
202120ROK RAWACL D-backs117381844218464%3.522.8%9.8%13.0%2.2%4.973.68—
202221A MLEVisalia Rawhide38167324894383%1.820.3%15.7%4.7%3.0%6.315.03—
202221A RAWVisalia Rawhide38167324894383%1.827.5%13.3%14.2%2.5%6.313.92—
202322MIX MLE2 levels40053256683430%1.320.9%15.3%5.5%1.8%5.984.24—
202322MIX RAW2 levels40053256683430%1.326.6%13.3%13.3%1.2%5.983.19—
202423MIX MLE2 levels29029145372920%1.020.6%19.5%1.1%1.3%5.834.53—
202423MIX MLE2 levels29029145372920%1.020.6%19.5%1.1%1.3%5.834.53—
202423MIX RAW2 levels29029145372920%1.025.5%20.0%5.5%1.4%5.834.43—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202726MLBARI——0——————22.9%12.1%10.8%3.0%4.714.71—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202827MLB MLEARI160177116820%1.122.9%11.9%11.1%3.0%4.694.71-0.0
202827MLB CTXARI606256310%1.022.9%11.9%11.1%3.0%4.694.71-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW606266310%1.022.9%11.9%11.1%3.0%4.694.33+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084419497320%1.122.9%11.9%11.1%3.0%4.694.33+0.5
Career— MLE146102401135213186227%1.618.8%16.4%2.4%1.9%5.554.64-0.0
/ 200 IP— MLE1228200946178155187%1.618.8%16.4%2.4%1.9%5.554.64-0.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 A+Hillsboro Hops · 23 IPFIP 3.48 → 4.53 (+1.05)K% 26.8% → 20.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.79%—×0.77020.62%
BB% (unintentional) /BF16.96%—×1.15019.51%
HR / BF /BF0.89%÷0.875×1.2501.28%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).

Result: FIP 3.48 → 4.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 6 IPFIP 6.81 → 7.50 (+0.69)K% 21.2% → 17.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.21%—×0.81017.18%
BB% (unintentional) /BF30.30%—×1.10033.33%
HR / BF /BF3.03%÷1.229×1.2002.96%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).

Result: FIP 6.81 → 7.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Hillsboro Hops · 47 IPFIP 3.23 → 4.24 (+1.01)K% 27.1% → 20.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.11%—×0.77020.88%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.33%—×1.15015.33%
HR / BF /BF1.33%÷0.952×1.2501.75%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).

Result: FIP 3.23 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 5 IPFIP 2.83 → 3.35 (+0.53)K% 22.6% → 18.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.58%—×0.81018.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.90%—×1.10014.19%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.637×1.2000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 227).

Result: FIP 2.83 → 3.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AVisalia Rawhide · 67 IPFIP 3.82 → 5.03 (+1.21)K% 27.5% → 20.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.47%—×0.74020.33%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.27%—×1.18015.66%
HR / BF /BF2.47%÷1.062×1.3003.02%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).

Result: FIP 3.82 → 5.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKACL D-backs · 38 IPFIP 3.60 → 5.03 (+1.43)K% 22.8% → 15.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.83%—×0.68015.52%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.78%—×1.25012.23%
HR / BF /BF2.17%÷0.986×1.4003.09%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).

Result: FIP 3.60 → 5.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ROKDSL D-backs 2 · 29 IPFIP 2.50 → 3.72 (+1.22)K% 28.6% → 19.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF28.57%—×0.68019.43%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.29%—×1.25017.86%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 2.50 → 3.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ROKDSL D-backs 2 · 24 IPFIP 4.03 → 5.03 (+1.00)K% 16.0% → 10.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF16.00%—×0.68010.88%
BB% (unintentional) /BF18.00%—×1.25022.50%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 4.03 → 5.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).