Luis Garcia
P Sugar Land Space Cowboys| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 26 | MLBHOU | 6 | 6 | 27 | 4.00 | 3.36 | 27.0% | 8.7% | 0.7 | ||
| 2024 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15.43 | 12.10 | 36.4% | 9.1% | — | K 36.4% · BB 9.1% · FIP 11.16 | |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX5 levels | 11 | 10 | 38 | 3.35 | 3.76 | 30.0% | 5.3% | 0.7 | K 24.6% · BB 5.1% · FIP 3.47 | |
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBHOU | 2 | 2 | 15 | 3.95 | 4.01 | 23.9% | 7.0% | 0.2 | ||
| 2028PROJ | 31 | MLBHOU | 22 | 22 | 130 | 4.07 | 4.19 | 23.2% | 7.3% | 1.8 | ||
| 2029PROJ | 32 | MLBHOU | 19 | 19 | 112 | 4.30 | 4.45 | 22.4% | 7.7% | 1.2 | ||
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | 6 | 1 | 11 | 47 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 17% | 1.8 | 38.3% | 8.5% | 29.8% | 2.1% | 1.64 | 2.11 | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros Blue | 6 | 1 | 11 | 47 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 17% | 1.8 | 38.3% | 8.5% | 29.8% | 2.1% | 1.64 | 2.10 | — |
| 2018 | 21 | A MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | 19 | 10 | 69 | 290 | 70 | 33 | 4 | 53% | 3.6 | 17.9% | 13.4% | 4.4% | 1.8% | 2.48 | 4.30 | — |
| 2018 | 21 | A RAW | Quad Cities River Bandits | 19 | 10 | 69 | 290 | 70 | 33 | 4 | 53% | 3.6 | 24.1% | 11.4% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 2.48 | 3.26 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 18 | 109 | 441 | 168 | 50 | 9 | 75% | 4.5 | 28.9% | 13.1% | 15.8% | 2.7% | 2.98 | 3.80 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 18 | 109 | 441 | 168 | 50 | 9 | 75% | 4.5 | 38.1% | 11.3% | 26.8% | 2.0% | 2.98 | 2.47 | — |
| 2020 | 23 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 5 | 1 | 12 | 49 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 2.5 | 18.4% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 2.0% | 2.92 | 3.96 | +0.1 |
| 2020 | 23 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 5 | 1 | 12 | 49 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 20% | 2.5 | 18.4% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 2.0% | 2.92 | 3.91 | +0.1 |
| 2021 | 24 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 30 | 28 | 155 | 633 | 167 | 49 | 19 | 93% | 5.2 | 26.4% | 7.7% | 18.6% | 3.1% | 3.48 | 3.55 | +3.5 |
| 2021 | 24 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 30 | 28 | 155 | 633 | 167 | 49 | 19 | 93% | 5.2 | 26.4% | 7.7% | 18.6% | 3.0% | 3.48 | 3.49 | +3.6 |
| 2022 | 25 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 28 | 28 | 157 | 643 | 157 | 47 | 23 | 100% | 5.6 | 24.4% | 7.3% | 17.1% | 3.7% | 3.72 | 3.98 | +2.7 |
| 2022 | 25 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 28 | 28 | 157 | 643 | 157 | 47 | 23 | 100% | 5.6 | 24.4% | 7.3% | 17.1% | 3.6% | 3.72 | 3.90 | +2.8 |
| 2023 | 26 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 6 | 6 | 27 | 115 | 31 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 4.5 | 27.0% | 8.7% | 18.3% | 2.7% | 4.00 | 3.40 | +0.7 |
| 2023 | 26 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 6 | 6 | 27 | 115 | 31 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 4.5 | 27.0% | 8.7% | 18.3% | 2.6% | 4.00 | 3.36 | +0.7 |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 1.2 | 36.4% | 9.1% | 27.3% | 18.2% | 15.43 | 11.16 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 1.2 | 36.4% | 9.1% | 27.3% | 18.2% | 15.43 | 11.16 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 1.2 | 36.4% | 9.1% | 27.3% | 18.2% | 15.43 | 12.10 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 11 | 10 | 38 | 150 | 45 | 8 | 7 | 91% | 3.4 | 24.6% | 5.1% | 19.4% | 3.3% | 3.35 | 3.47 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 11 | 10 | 38 | 150 | 45 | 8 | 7 | 91% | 3.4 | 24.6% | 5.1% | 19.4% | 3.3% | 3.35 | 3.47 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX RAW | 5 levels | 11 | 10 | 38 | 150 | 45 | 8 | 7 | 91% | 3.4 | 30.0% | 5.3% | 24.7% | 4.7% | 3.35 | 3.76 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 71 | 65 | 360 | 1468 | 371 | 112 | 48 | 92% | 5.1 | 25.3% | 7.6% | 17.6% | 3.3% | 3.60 | 3.71 | +7.4 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | HOU | 2 | 2 | 15 | 63 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 100% | 7.5 | 23.9% | 7.0% | 17.0% | 3.0% | 3.95 | 4.01 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | HOU | 22 | 22 | 130 | 547 | 127 | 40 | 18 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.2% | 7.3% | 15.9% | 3.3% | 4.12 | 4.24 | +1.8 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB MLE | HOU | 19 | 19 | 112 | 475 | 106 | 37 | 17 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 7.7% | 14.7% | 3.5% | 4.35 | 4.50 | +1.2 |
| 2030 | 33 | MLB MLE | HOU | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 88 | 33 | 16 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.5% | 8.2% | 13.4% | 3.8% | 4.61 | 4.78 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 34 | MLB MLE | HOU | 14 | 14 | 82 | 345 | 71 | 30 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.6% | 8.6% | 12.0% | 4.1% | 4.89 | 5.08 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | HOU | 22 | 22 | 130 | 549 | 127 | 40 | 17 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.2% | 7.3% | 15.9% | 3.2% | 4.07 | 4.19 | +1.8 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB CTX | HOU | 19 | 19 | 112 | 473 | 106 | 36 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.4% | 7.7% | 14.7% | 3.4% | 4.30 | 4.45 | +1.2 |
| 2030 | 33 | MLB CTX | HOU | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 88 | 33 | 15 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.5% | 8.2% | 13.4% | 3.7% | 4.55 | 4.72 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 34 | MLB CTX | HOU | 14 | 14 | 82 | 346 | 71 | 30 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.6% | 8.6% | 12.0% | 4.0% | 4.83 | 5.02 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 141 | 135 | 780 | 3244 | 763 | 252 | 110 | 96% | 5.5 | 23.5% | 7.8% | 15.8% | 3.4% | 4.03 | 3.96 | +13.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 35 | 200 | 831 | 196 | 65 | 28 | 96% | 5.5 | 23.5% | 7.8% | 15.8% | 3.4% | 4.03 | 3.96 | +3.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 131 | 104 | 581 | 2379 | 602 | 221 | 72 | 79% | 4.4 | 25.3% | 9.3% | 16.0% | 3.0% | 3.35 | 3.81 | +11.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 36 | 200 | 819 | 207 | 76 | 25 | 79% | 4.4 | 25.3% | 9.3% | 16.0% | 3.0% | 3.35 | 3.81 | +2.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAASugar Land Space Cowboys · 17 IPFIP 2.98 → 3.47 (+0.49)K% 28.6% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.860 | 24.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.71% | — | ×0.900 | 5.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.86% | ÷0.961 | ×1.100 | 3.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 2.98 → 3.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AACorpus Christi Hooks · 7 IPFIP 5.34 → 6.38 (+1.04)K% 28.1% → 22.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.12% | — | ×0.810 | 22.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.38% | — | ×1.100 | 10.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.25% | ÷1.057 | ×1.200 | 7.10% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 5.34 → 6.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Fayetteville Woodpeckers · 66 IPFIP 2.34 → 3.64 (+1.29)K% 39.4% → 30.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.42% | — | ×0.770 | 30.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.41% | — | ×1.150 | 14.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.82% | ÷0.969 | ×1.250 | 2.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 2.34 → 3.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AQuad Cities River Bandits · 43 IPFIP 2.59 → 4.06 (+1.47)K% 35.9% → 26.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.93% | — | ×0.740 | 26.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.58% | — | ×1.180 | 11.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.40% | ÷0.964 | ×1.300 | 3.23% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 2.59 → 4.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AQuad Cities River Bandits · 69 IPFIP 3.26 → 4.30 (+1.04)K% 24.1% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.14% | — | ×0.740 | 17.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.38% | — | ×1.180 | 13.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.38% | ÷0.973 | ×1.300 | 1.84% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.26 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKDSL Astros Blue · 11 IPFIP 2.11 → 3.88 (+1.77)K% 38.3% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.30% | — | ×0.680 | 26.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.51% | — | ×1.250 | 10.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.13% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.98% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.11 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.7 | 117 | 23.6% | 7.6% | 1.31 | 4.04 |
| Mike Fiers ('21) | 5.8 | 128 | 20.5% | 7.0% | 1.44 | 4.07 |
| Jon Gray ('25) | 6.2 | 123 | 23.4% | 7.8% | 1.17 | 4.49 |
| Matt Harvey ('21) | 4.8 | 121 | 21.2% | 6.7% | 1.15 | 4.42 |
| John Montefusco ('74-'86, 20 WAR*) | 8.3 | 150 | 22.5%* | 7.3%* | 1.20* | 4.16* |
| Ed Halicki ('74-'80, 11 WAR*) | 5.3 | 152 | 22.9%* | 7.2%* | 1.10* | 4.18* |
| Sonny Siebert ('64-'75, 28 WAR*) | 10.8 | 179 | 22.1%* | 7.5%* | 1.17* | 3.86* |