Casey Yamauchi
SS Midland RockHounds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | A+/AOAK | 329 | .267/.342/.315 | 0 | 20 | 61 | — | .239/.302/.280 |
| 2025 | 24 | AA/A+OAK | 500 | .284/.338/.363 | 2 | 13 | 55 | — | .235/.281/.295 |
| 2026 | 25 | AA/A+OAK | 462 | .293/.365/.413 | 9 | 29 | 88 | — | .266/.327/.362 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 26 | MLBOAK | 3 | .255/.303/.338 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ27% MLB | 27 | MLBOAK | 45 | .254/.303/.340 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 0.0 | |
| 2029PROJ40% MLB | 28 | MLBOAK | 83 | .252/.302/.339 | 1 | 2 | 77 | 0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 60 / POW 25
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 35 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 194 | 286 | 226 | 512 | 32 | 231 | 14 | 6 | 248 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 197 | 178 | 42 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 236 | 306 | 258 | 565 | 22 | 256 | 7 | 6 | 266 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 132 | 114 | 36 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 316 | 395 | 404 | 799 | 88 | 350 | 10 | 8 | 355 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 19 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 474 | 474 | 789 | 1.263 | 316 | 500 | 11 | 0 | 548 | 181 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 481 | 435 | 120 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 36 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 276 | 333 | 345 | 677 | 69 | 294 | 7 | 5 | 304 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA | Midland RockHounds | — | 261 | 237 | 69 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 26 | 10 | 20 | 4 | 291 | 346 | 401 | 747 | 110 | 309 | 10 | 4 | 332 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 201 | 172 | 51 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 297 | 389 | 430 | 819 | 134 | 313 | 9 | 8 | 365 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 35 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 188 | 257 | 219 | 476 | 31 | 211 | 17 | 3 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 197 | 181 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 2 | 204 | 265 | 221 | 486 | 17 | 225 | 9 | 4 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 132 | 117 | 34 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 291 | 357 | 368 | 724 | 77 | 324 | 13 | 5 | 315 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 19 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 421 | 421 | 737 | 1.158 | 316 | 431 | 11 | 0 | 436 | 181 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 481 | 443 | 101 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 47 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 228 | 275 | 278 | 553 | 50 | 241 | 10 | 3 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 261 | 240 | 65 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 10 | 20 | 4 | 271 | 319 | 362 | 682 | 92 | 290 | 12 | 3 | 294 | 85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 201 | 177 | 46 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 260 | 338 | 362 | 700 | 102 | 277 | 12 | 6 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 35 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 188 | 257 | 219 | 476 | 31 | 231 | 17 | 3 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA RAW | Midland RockHounds | — | 35 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 194 | 286 | 226 | 512 | 32 | 231 | 14 | 6 | 248 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 329 | 299 | 72 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 36 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 241 | 302 | 284 | 586 | 43 | 272 | 11 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 329 | 292 | 78 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 27 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 267 | 342 | 315 | 657 | 48 | 292 | 8 | 6 | 302 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 500 | 462 | 108 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 50 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 234 | 279 | 292 | 571 | 58 | 254 | 10 | 3 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 500 | 454 | 129 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 38 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 284 | 338 | 363 | 702 | 79 | 302 | 8 | 4 | 313 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 462 | 418 | 111 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 56 | 19 | 29 | 4 | 266 | 325 | 361 | 687 | 96 | 291 | 12 | 4 | 298 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 462 | 409 | 120 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 27 | 45 | 19 | 29 | 4 | 293 | 365 | 413 | 778 | 120 | 311 | 10 | 6 | 347 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22 | AA MLE | Midland RockHounds | — | 35 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 188 | 257 | 219 | 476 | 31 | 211 | 17 | 3 | 209 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 329 | 300 | 72 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 36 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 240 | 302 | 283 | 585 | 43 | 265 | 11 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 500 | 467 | 108 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 50 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 231 | 279 | 289 | 568 | 58 | 248 | 10 | 3 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 462 | 422 | 111 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 56 | 19 | 29 | 4 | 263 | 325 | 358 | 683 | 95 | 284 | 12 | 4 | 298 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 329 | 300 | 72 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 36 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 240 | 302 | 283 | 585 | 43 | 265 | 11 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 500 | 467 | 108 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 50 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 231 | 279 | 289 | 568 | 58 | 248 | 10 | 3 | 249 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 462 | 422 | 111 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 56 | 19 | 29 | 4 | 263 | 325 | 358 | 683 | 95 | 284 | 12 | 4 | 298 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 2% | 380 | 352 | 88 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 47 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 249 | 297 | 327 | 624 | 79 | 276 | 12 | 4 | 282 | 77 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +4 | +8 | 0.2 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 2% | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 303 | 338 | 641 | 83 | 283 | 0 | 0 | 289 | 77 | -0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 27% | 167 | 155 | 39 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 248 | 297 | 329 | 626 | 81 | 276 | 13 | 4 | 283 | 78 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +4 | 0.1 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | OAK | 40% | 209 | 193 | 47 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 29 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 246 | 296 | 328 | 625 | 83 | 276 | 14 | 4 | 282 | 77 | -6 | +1 | -1 | +2 | +5 | 0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 27% | 45 | 42 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 254 | 303 | 340 | 643 | 86 | 284 | 13 | 4 | 290 | 78 | -1 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | 0.0 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | OAK | 40% | 83 | 78 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 252 | 302 | 339 | 642 | 87 | 284 | 13 | 4 | 289 | 77 | -2 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +2 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 128 | 120 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 242 | 289 | 308 | 597 | 67 | 275 | 13 | 4 | 290 | 70 | -3 | +1 | -0 | +1 | +3 | 0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 609 | 147 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 86 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 241 | 288 | 307 | 595 | 66 | 274 | 13 | 4 | 290 | 70 | -17 | +3 | -1 | +7 | +14 | 0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1857 | 1703 | 418 | 58 | 10 | 14 | 68 | 218 | 61 | 77 | 20 | 245 | 299 | 316 | 614 | 70 | 272 | 12 | 4 | 272 | 70 | -14 | +2 | -1 | +6 | +12 | 0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 596 | 147 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 76 | 21 | 27 | 7 | 247 | 300 | 319 | 618 | 72 | 273 | 12 | 4 | 272 | 70 | -18 | +2 | -1 | +7 | +14 | 0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAMidland RockHounds · 261 PAwOBA .325 → .294 (−31)K% 10.0% → 12.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 9.96% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 12.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.988 | 2.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.83% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.988 | 3.29% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.59% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 24.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 3.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.47% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 0.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.37% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 1.87% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .325 → .294; ISO .110 → .093; BABIP .309 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 201 PAwOBA .358 → .304 (−54)K% 9.5% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 9.45% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 12.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.46% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.968 | 5.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.48% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.968 | 3.42% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.022 | ×0.968 | 22.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.022 | ×0.968 | 4.71% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.65% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.022 | ×0.968 | 0.55% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.968 | 2.02% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .358 → .304; ISO .134 → .109; BABIP .313 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 481 PAwOBA .300 → .242 (−58)K% 7.5% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 7.48% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 9.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.37% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.978 | 2.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.12% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.978 | 2.41% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.81% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×1.025 | ×0.978 | 20.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×1.025 | ×0.978 | 3.56% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.75% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.025 | ×0.978 | 0.56% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.25% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 0.21% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.
Result: wOBA .300 → .242; ISO .069 → .050; BABIP .294 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAMidland RockHounds · 19 PAwOBA .531 → .436 (−95)K% 10.5% → 13.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.53% | ÷0.988 | ×1.220 | — | — | 13.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷1.078 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 35.29% | ÷1.012 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.998 | 32.01% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.131 | ×0.840 | — | ×0.998 | 4.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.998 | 4.80% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.88% | ÷1.043 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 4.50% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 102, 2B 126, 3B 130, K 98, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .531 → .436; ISO .316 → .239; BABIP .500 → .431. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 197 PAwOBA .259 → .220 (−39)K% 7.1% → 9.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 7.11% | ÷0.974 | ×1.270 | — | — | 9.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.58% | ÷0.974 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.55% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 2.77% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.17% | ÷1.036 | ×0.920 | ×1.011 | ×0.988 | 20.55% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.44% | ÷0.992 | ×0.810 | ×1.011 | ×0.988 | 1.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.011 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.867 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 107, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 95, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .259 → .220; ISO .022 → .018; BABIP .256 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AStockton Ports · 132 PAwOBA .352 → .315 (−37)K% 9.8% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 9.85% | ÷1.015 | ×1.360 | — | — | 13.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.58% | ÷1.021 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 5.02% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.79% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 2.90% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.72% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×1.038 | ×0.980 | 25.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.94% | ÷0.979 | ×0.830 | ×1.038 | ×0.980 | 5.12% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.98% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.038 | ×0.980 | 2.04% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.164 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 101, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 103, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.038.
Result: wOBA .352 → .315; ISO .088 → .084; BABIP .350 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAMidland RockHounds · 35 PAwOBA .242 → .209 (−33)K% 14.3% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.29% | ÷0.981 | ×1.220 | — | — | 17.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.71% | ÷1.031 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 3.98% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.71% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 5.11% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.23% | ÷1.021 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.027 | 17.79% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷1.011 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 3.28% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.957 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 104, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 96, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .242 → .209; ISO .032 → .027; BABIP .231 → .211. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).