Gil Luna
P Birmingham Barons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | AACWS | 40 | 0 | 40 | 6.13 | 4.61 | 27.7% | 22.3% | — | K 22.5% · BB 24.5% · FIP 5.37 | |
| 2024 | 25 | AACWS | 42 | 0 | 45 | 2.80 | 3.97 | 23.6% | 22.2% | — | K 19.2% · BB 24.4% · FIP 4.57 | |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 29 | 0 | 36 | 4.21 | 4.37 | 25.1% | 23.4% | — | K 20.6% · BB 28.0% · FIP 5.57 | |
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBCWS | — | — | 0 | 5.83 | 5.83 | 20.6% | 20.0% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBCWS | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5.76 | 5.81 | 20.6% | 19.1% | -0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 15 | 53 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 45.3% | 11.3% | 34.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.71 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 15 | 53 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 45.3% | 11.3% | 34.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.14 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 0 | 6 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 0.7 | 22.6% | 19.4% | 3.2% | 6.5% | 7.11 | 7.19 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 0 | 6 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 0.7 | 22.6% | 19.4% | 3.2% | 6.5% | 7.11 | 7.84 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 40 | 0 | 40 | 184 | 51 | 41 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.5% | 24.5% | -2.1% | 1.9% | 6.13 | 5.37 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | AA RAW | Birmingham Barons | 40 | 0 | 40 | 184 | 51 | 41 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.7% | 22.3% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 6.13 | 4.61 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 42 | 0 | 45 | 203 | 48 | 45 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.2% | 24.4% | -5.2% | 0.0% | 2.80 | 4.57 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 42 | 0 | 45 | 203 | 48 | 45 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.2% | 24.4% | -5.2% | 0.0% | 2.80 | 4.57 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA RAW | Birmingham Barons | 42 | 0 | 45 | 203 | 48 | 45 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.6% | 22.2% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 2.80 | 3.97 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 29 | 0 | 36 | 167 | 42 | 39 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 20.6% | 28.0% | -7.4% | 1.2% | 4.21 | 5.57 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 29 | 0 | 36 | 167 | 42 | 39 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 20.6% | 28.0% | -7.4% | 1.2% | 4.21 | 5.57 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 29 | 0 | 36 | 167 | 42 | 39 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.1% | 23.4% | 1.8% | 0.6% | 4.21 | 4.37 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | CWS | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.6% | 20.0% | 0.6% | 2.8% | 5.83 | 5.83 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | CWS | 14 | 0 | 15 | 62 | 13 | 12 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.6% | 19.1% | 1.5% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.81 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | CWS | 4 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.6% | 19.1% | 1.5% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.81 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 4 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.6% | 19.1% | 1.5% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.43 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 182 | 182 | 45 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.6% | 19.1% | 1.5% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.43 | -2.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 130 | 0 | 143 | 638 | 146 | 153 | 8 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.8% | 24.0% | -1.2% | 1.2% | 3.97 | 4.87 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 182 | 0 | 200 | 894 | 204 | 215 | 11 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.8% | 24.0% | -1.2% | 1.2% | 3.97 | 4.87 | -2.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AABirmingham Barons · 12 IPFIP 6.35 → 7.53 (+1.18)K% 20.0% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.810 | 16.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 32.31% | — | ×1.100 | 35.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.54% | ÷0.784 | ×1.200 | 2.35% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 57).
Result: FIP 6.35 → 7.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL White Sox · 16 IPFIP 2.01 → 3.52 (+1.51)K% 37.1% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.10% | — | ×0.680 | 25.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.13% | — | ×1.250 | 20.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.128 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 2.01 → 3.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 8 IPFIP 4.37 → 5.04 (+0.67)K% 15.0% → 11.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.770 | 11.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.00% | — | ×1.150 | 23.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.923 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 5.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABirmingham Barons · 45 IPFIP 3.91 → 4.57 (+0.66)K% 23.6% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.65% | — | ×0.810 | 19.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.17% | — | ×1.100 | 24.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.935 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 3.91 → 4.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AABirmingham Barons · 40 IPFIP 4.48 → 5.37 (+0.89)K% 27.7% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.72% | — | ×0.810 | 22.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 22.28% | — | ×1.100 | 24.51% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.63% | ÷1.013 | ×1.200 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 4.48 → 5.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 6 IPFIP 7.17 → 9.21 (+2.04)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.86% | — | ×1.150 | 20.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.14% | ÷0.955 | ×1.250 | 9.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 7.17 → 9.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKACL White Sox · 9 IPFIP 0.29 → 2.06 (+1.78)K% 51.5% → 35.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 51.52% | — | ×0.680 | 35.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.12% | — | ×1.250 | 15.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.027 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 0.29 → 2.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AKannapolis Cannon Ballers · 6 IPFIP 1.41 → 2.41 (+1.00)K% 35.0% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.00% | — | ×0.740 | 25.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.180 | 11.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.925 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 1.41 → 2.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).