Aaron Nola

PosP
B/TR/R
Born1993-06-04
Age (2027)34
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
MLBSP40-MAN
Pitching
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202431MLBPHI33331993.573.8324.0%6.1%3.8
202532MIX2 levels20201075.574.0325.1%6.8%1.7K 24.5% · BB 6.7% · FIP 3.91
202633MLBPHI33331754.674.8023.8%7.7%1.2
2027PROJ34MLBPHI22221294.544.7023.3%7.5%1.0
2028PROJ35MLBPHI1616985.025.2222.3%8.0%0.4
2029PROJ36MLBPHI1212695.375.6021.3%8.6%-0.0
Last 3 seasons WAR 6.7  ·  Next 3 projected WAR 1.4Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Hitting
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WAR
201825MLBPHI70.048/.063/.06500-77-1.3
201926MLBPHI70.119/.200/.15300-4-0.7
202128MLBPHI63.143/.236/.184008-0.6
202229No MLB games played
202330No MLB games played
202431No MLB games played
202532No MLB games played
202633No MLB games played
Last 3 seasons WAR -2.6
Contract
No contract data on file.
Form3.06 ERA (proj 4.54) · K 18.8% (proj 23.3%) · BB 7.8% (proj 7.5%) ▼ last 60d · 32 IP through Oct 27
CompsMerrill Kelly (age 34) · Jose Contreras (age 34) · Hisashi Iwakuma (age 34)

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201522MIX MLE3 levels31311877471603618100%6.019.4%5.0%14.4%2.5%2.893.48+4.4
201522MIX RAW3 levels31311877471603618100%6.021.4%4.8%16.6%2.4%2.893.22+5.1
201623MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies20201114831212610100%5.525.1%5.4%19.7%1.9%4.782.73+3.8
201623MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies20201114831212610100%5.525.1%5.4%19.7%2.1%4.782.79+3.7
201724MIX MLE2 levels29291787301944818100%6.126.6%6.8%19.8%2.4%3.383.05+5.3
201724MIX RAW2 levels29291787301944818100%6.126.6%6.6%20.0%2.5%3.383.04+5.3
201825MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies33332128312245517100%6.427.0%6.6%20.3%1.9%2.372.71+7.4
201825MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies33332128312245517100%6.427.0%6.6%20.3%2.0%2.372.81+7.0
201926MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies34342028522297727100%6.026.9%9.0%17.8%3.0%3.873.60+4.4
201926MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies34342028522297727100%6.026.9%9.0%17.8%3.2%3.873.71+4.1
202027MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies12127128996219100%5.933.2%7.3%26.0%2.9%3.282.81+2.4
202027MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies12127128996219100%5.933.2%7.3%26.0%3.1%3.282.93+2.2
202128MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies32321817492233826100%5.629.8%5.1%24.7%3.2%4.633.01+5.4
202128MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies32321817492233826100%5.629.8%5.1%24.7%3.5%4.633.13+5.1
202229MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies32322058072352819100%6.429.1%3.5%25.7%2.2%3.252.29+8.4
202229MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies32322058072352819100%6.429.1%3.5%25.7%2.4%3.252.42+8.0
202330MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies32321947932024532100%6.125.5%5.7%19.8%3.8%4.463.73+3.9
202330MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies32321947932024532100%6.125.5%5.7%19.8%4.0%4.463.86+3.6
202431MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies33331998201975030100%6.024.0%6.1%17.9%3.4%3.573.72+4.1
202431MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies33331998201975030100%6.024.0%6.1%17.9%3.4%3.573.72+4.1
202431MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies33331998201975030100%6.024.0%6.1%17.9%3.7%3.573.83+3.8
202532MIX MLE2 levels20201074551143118100%5.324.5%6.7%17.8%3.7%5.573.91+1.9
202532MIX MLE2 levels20201074551143118100%5.324.5%6.7%17.8%3.7%5.573.91+1.9
202532MIX RAW2 levels20201074551143118100%5.325.1%6.8%18.2%4.0%5.574.03+1.7
202633MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies33331757441775737100%5.323.8%7.7%16.1%4.6%4.674.61+1.6
202633MLB MLEPhiladelphia Phillies33331757441775737100%5.323.8%7.7%16.1%4.6%4.674.61+1.6
202633MLB RAWPhiladelphia Phillies33331757441775737100%5.323.8%7.7%16.1%5.0%4.674.80+1.2
▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded)
MLB Career—318318189177832053490254100%5.926.4%6.3%20.1%3.3%3.913.45+45.2
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202734MLBPHI22221295451274122100%5.923.3%7.5%15.8%4.1%4.544.70+1.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202835MLB MLEPHI161698414923318100%6.122.3%8.0%14.3%4.4%4.845.04+0.4
202936MLB MLEPHI111169290622514100%6.221.3%8.6%12.7%4.8%5.185.41-0.0
202835MLB CTXPHI161698414923320100%6.122.3%8.0%14.3%4.7%5.025.22+0.4
202936MLB CTXPHI121269291622515100%5.821.3%8.6%12.7%5.1%5.375.60-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW346346205884872207548289100%5.926.0%6.5%19.5%3.4%4.013.59+45.4
/ 200 IP— RAW34342008252155328100%6.026.0%6.5%19.5%3.4%4.013.59+4.4
Career— MLE341341202383002154515246100%5.926.0%6.2%19.8%3.0%3.803.32+45.3
/ 200 IP— MLE34342008212135124100%5.926.0%6.2%19.8%3.0%3.803.32+4.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 12 IPFIP 1.03 → 1.35 (+0.32)K% 33.3% → 28.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF33.33%—×0.86028.67%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.88%—×0.9005.29%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.947×1.1000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).

Result: FIP 1.03 → 1.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 10 IPFIP 1.16 → 1.45 (+0.29)K% 27.0% → 23.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.03%—×0.88023.78%
BB% (unintentional) /BF2.70%—×1.0502.84%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.043×1.1000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).

Result: FIP 1.16 → 1.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAReading Fightin Phils · 77 IPFIP 2.53 → 3.03 (+0.50)K% 20.5% → 16.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF20.49%—×0.81016.59%
BB% (unintentional) /BF3.12%—×1.1003.44%
HR / BF /BF1.39%÷1.021×1.2001.63%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).

Result: FIP 2.53 → 3.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 33 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.73 (+0.63)K% 23.4% → 20.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.40%—×0.88020.60%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.38%—×1.0506.70%
HR / BF /BF2.13%÷0.845×1.1002.77%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).

Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).