Ben Newton
2B Stockton Ports| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23 | AAA/A+/ROKOAK | 210 | .254/.324/.335 | 0 | 1 | 27 | — | .184/.236/.242 |
| 2026 | 24 | A+/AOAK | 110 | .179/.284/.211 | 0 | 0 | 7 | — | .142/.220/.173 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBOAK | 200 | .184/.246/.248 | 1 | 3 | 40 | -0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 26 | MLBOAK | 55 | .194/.256/.272 | 0 | 1 | 45 | -0.2 |
Tools · ContractCON 20 / POW 28
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | AAA | Las Vegas Aviators | — | 16 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 375 | 125 | 182 | 31 | 0 | 161 | -28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 129 | 117 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 239 | 288 | 291 | 579 | 51 | 359 | 32 | 5 | 257 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | ROK | ACL Athletics | — | 65 | 52 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 327 | 444 | 462 | 906 | 135 | 425 | 20 | 15 | 395 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 50 | 40 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 225 | 380 | 275 | 655 | 50 | 450 | 40 | 18 | 317 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A | Stockton Ports | — | 60 | 55 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 145 | 203 | 164 | 367 | 18 | 200 | 25 | 7 | 173 | -24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | — | 16 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 375 | 125 | 160 | 38 | 0 | 127 | -28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 129 | 119 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 54 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 216 | 210 | 426 | 34 | 292 | 42 | 4 | 186 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Athletics | — | 65 | 56 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 214 | 302 | 304 | 605 | 89 | 312 | 29 | 9 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 50 | 43 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 163 | 280 | 209 | 489 | 47 | 406 | 50 | 12 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 60 | 56 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 125 | 169 | 143 | 312 | 18 | 178 | 33 | 5 | 132 | -24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 210 | 191 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 79 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 178 | 230 | 225 | 456 | 47 | 296 | 38 | 5 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 210 | 185 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 59 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 254 | 324 | 335 | 659 | 81 | 364 | 28 | 8 | 293 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 110 | 99 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 141 | 220 | 172 | 392 | 30 | 264 | 42 | 8 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 110 | 95 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 179 | 284 | 211 | 495 | 32 | 283 | 32 | 12 | 239 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 210 | 195 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 79 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 174 | 230 | 221 | 451 | 46 | 288 | 38 | 5 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 110 | 99 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 141 | 220 | 172 | 392 | 30 | 282 | 42 | 8 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 210 | 195 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 79 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 174 | 230 | 221 | 451 | 46 | 288 | 38 | 5 | 208 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 110 | 99 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 141 | 220 | 172 | 392 | 30 | 282 | 42 | 8 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | OAK | 0% | 200 | 183 | 34 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 59 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 184 | 246 | 248 | 494 | 65 | 262 | 30 | 6 | 228 | 40 | -14 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +4 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | OAK | 30% | 183 | 167 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 54 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 188 | 251 | 261 | 512 | 73 | 264 | 30 | 7 | 235 | 45 | -12 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +4 | -0.7 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | OAK | 30% | 55 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 194 | 256 | 272 | 528 | 78 | 273 | 29 | 7 | 241 | 45 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 55 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 180 | 255 | 220 | 475 | 40 | 265 | 29 | 7 | 241 | 31 | -4 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 591 | 107 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 189 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 181 | 255 | 222 | 477 | 41 | 266 | 29 | 7 | 241 | 31 | -42 | +2 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 609 | 554 | 98 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 39 | 210 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 177 | 239 | 235 | 473 | 58 | 277 | 34 | 6 | 214 | 31 | -19 | +1 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -1.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 591 | 104 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 42 | 224 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 176 | 237 | 232 | 469 | 56 | 276 | 34 | 6 | 214 | 31 | -44 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AStockton Ports · 60 PAwOBA .169 → .132 (−37)K% 25.0% → 34.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 34.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 4.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.999 | ×0.980 | 15.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.999 | ×0.980 | 2.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.999 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .169 → .132; ISO .018 → .014; BABIP .200 → .178. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 50 PAwOBA .311 → .233 (−77)K% 40.0% → 50.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 40.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 50.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 18.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 12.63% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.00% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 1.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 40.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 36.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 5.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 4.20% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .311 → .233; ISO .050 → .037; BABIP .450 → .406. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 129 PAwOBA .255 → .186 (−69)K% 31.8% → 41.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.78% | ÷0.969 | ×1.270 | — | — | 41.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.43% | ÷1.048 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 3.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.78% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.61% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.26% | ÷1.078 | ×0.920 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 25.52% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷1.199 | ×0.810 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 3.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.32% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×0.990 | ×0.998 | 0.96% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.921 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 116, 2B 140, 3B 130, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .255 → .186; ISO .051 → .032; BABIP .359 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKACL Athletics · 65 PAwOBA .392 → .273 (−119)K% 20.0% → 29.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.00% | ÷0.983 | ×1.440 | — | — | 29.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.38% | ÷0.971 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 9.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.54% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 1.07% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.21% | ÷1.039 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 21.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.82% | ÷1.020 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 8.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.56% | ÷0.989 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 1.80% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.926 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 108, 2B 104, 3B 98, K 97, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .392 → .273; ISO .135 → .093; BABIP .425 → .312. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 16 PAwOBA .156 → .127 (−29)K% 31.2% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.25% | ÷1.027 | ×1.200 | — | — | 36.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 0.00% | ÷0.970 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.052 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 18.18% | ÷0.988 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.050 | 16.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.970 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.183 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 110, 2B 98, 3B 100, K 105, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .156 → .127; ISO .125 → .102; BABIP .182 → .160. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).