Bryce Warrecker
P Hudson Valley Renegades| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 19 | 19 | 65 | 5.79 | 4.46 | 15.7% | 10.2% | — | K 11.3% · BB 11.7% · FIP 5.43 |
| 2025 | 23 | A+NYY | 40 | 1 | 57 | 2.05 | 1.87 | 28.2% | 6.0% | — | K 21.7% · BB 6.9% · FIP 2.47 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 31 | 0 | 43 | 2.93 | 4.45 | 21.0% | 12.7% | — | K 17.4% · BB 16.5% · FIP 6.08 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBNYY | — | — | 0 | 4.93 | 4.93 | 19.0% | 11.3% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBNYY | 19 | 0 | 20 | 4.84 | 4.82 | 19.9% | 11.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 27 | MLBNYY | 24 | 0 | 25 | 4.81 | 4.82 | 20.2% | 11.0% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 19 | 19 | 65 | 293 | 46 | 30 | 7 | 100% | 3.4 | 11.3% | 11.7% | -0.5% | 3.3% | 5.79 | 5.43 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 19 | 19 | 65 | 293 | 46 | 30 | 7 | 100% | 3.4 | 11.3% | 11.7% | -0.5% | 3.3% | 5.79 | 5.43 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 19 | 19 | 65 | 293 | 46 | 30 | 7 | 100% | 3.4 | 15.7% | 10.2% | 5.5% | 2.4% | 5.79 | 4.46 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Hudson Valley Renegades | 40 | 1 | 57 | 216 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2% | 1.4 | 21.7% | 6.9% | 14.8% | 0.6% | 2.05 | 2.47 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Hudson Valley Renegades | 40 | 1 | 57 | 216 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2% | 1.4 | 21.7% | 6.9% | 14.8% | 0.6% | 2.05 | 2.47 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | Hudson Valley Renegades | 40 | 1 | 57 | 216 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 2% | 1.4 | 28.2% | 6.0% | 22.2% | 0.5% | 2.05 | 1.87 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 43 | 181 | 38 | 23 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.4% | 16.5% | 0.9% | 4.3% | 2.93 | 6.08 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 43 | 181 | 38 | 23 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.4% | 16.5% | 0.9% | 4.3% | 2.93 | 6.08 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 0 | 43 | 181 | 38 | 23 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 21.0% | 12.7% | 8.3% | 2.8% | 2.93 | 4.45 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | NYY | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.0% | 11.3% | 7.7% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.93 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYY | 44 | 0 | 46 | 193 | 39 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.9% | 11.0% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 4.84 | 4.82 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYY | 38 | 0 | 40 | 169 | 34 | 19 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.2% | 11.0% | 9.2% | 3.0% | 4.81 | 4.82 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYY | 19 | 0 | 20 | 84 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 11.0% | 8.9% | 3.0% | 4.84 | 4.82 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYY | 24 | 0 | 25 | 106 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.2% | 11.0% | 9.2% | 3.0% | 4.81 | 4.82 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 43 | 0 | 45 | 190 | 38 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 3.0% | 4.82 | 4.44 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 169 | 93 | 27 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.1% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 3.0% | 4.82 | 4.44 | +0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 90 | 20 | 165 | 690 | 111 | 79 | 19 | 22% | 1.8 | 16.2% | 11.5% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 3.76 | 4.67 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 109 | 24 | 200 | 835 | 135 | 96 | 22 | 22% | 1.8 | 16.2% | 11.5% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 3.76 | 4.67 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 34 IPFIP 4.89 → 6.08 (+1.18)K% 22.6% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.60% | — | ×0.770 | 17.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.38% | — | ×1.150 | 16.54% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.42% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.28% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.89 → 6.08, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ATampa Tarpons · 9 IPFIP 2.62 → 3.06 (+0.44)K% 14.3% → 10.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.29% | — | ×0.740 | 10.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.71% | — | ×1.180 | 6.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.62 → 3.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 57 IPFIP 1.73 → 2.47 (+0.74)K% 28.2% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.24% | — | ×0.770 | 21.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.02% | — | ×1.150 | 6.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.46% | ÷0.969 | ×1.250 | 0.60% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 1.73 → 2.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ATampa Tarpons · 50 IPFIP 4.93 → 5.99 (+1.06)K% 13.8% → 10.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.84% | — | ×0.740 | 10.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.05% | — | ×1.180 | 14.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.68% | ÷0.979 | ×1.300 | 3.56% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 4.93 → 5.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Yankees · 13 IPFIP 2.37 → 3.25 (+0.87)K% 22.4% → 15.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.41% | — | ×0.680 | 15.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 1.72% | — | ×1.250 | 2.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷1.142 | ×1.400 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).
Result: FIP 2.37 → 3.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.7 | 48 | 19.6% | 11.1% | 1.15 | 4.87 |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |
| Valerio De Los Santos ('08) | 1.3 | 51 | 18.7% | 11.5% | 1.30 | 4.57 |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Pedro Borbón ('03) | 1.4 | 45 | 18.5% | 11.1% | 1.10 | 4.68 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |