Orion Kerkering
P Philadelphia Phillies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 68 | 2 | 67 | 2.14 | 1.75 | 30.7% | 6.2% | 2.3 | K 28.8% · BB 6.6% · FIP 1.90 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLBPHI | 69 | 0 | 60 | 3.30 | 3.43 | 24.4% | 9.0% | 0.8 | |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 66 | 0 | 62 | 4.79 | 3.55 | 24.0% | 11.7% | 0.7 | K 23.5% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.63 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBPHI | 51 | 0 | 54 | 3.77 | 3.90 | 25.6% | 10.4% | 0.4 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 27 | MLBPHI | 36 | 0 | 38 | 3.87 | 3.94 | 25.6% | 10.5% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 28 | MLBPHI | 30 | 0 | 31 | 3.96 | 4.02 | 25.4% | 10.7% | 0.2 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.0% | 3.6% | 21.4% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 1.44 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.0% | 3.6% | 21.4% | 0.0% | 3.86 | 1.53 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 222 | 85 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.3% | 7.4% | 20.9% | 3.1% | 1.59 | 3.34 | +0.8 |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 5 levels | 52 | 0 | 57 | 222 | 85 | 14 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 38.3% | 6.3% | 32.0% | 1.8% | 1.59 | 1.76 | +1.9 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 68 | 2 | 67 | 274 | 84 | 17 | 2 | 3% | 1.0 | 28.8% | 6.6% | 22.2% | 0.7% | 2.14 | 1.90 | +2.1 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 68 | 2 | 67 | 274 | 84 | 17 | 2 | 3% | 1.0 | 28.8% | 6.6% | 22.2% | 0.7% | 2.14 | 1.90 | +2.1 |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 68 | 2 | 67 | 274 | 84 | 17 | 2 | 3% | 1.0 | 30.7% | 6.2% | 24.5% | 0.7% | 2.14 | 1.75 | +2.3 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB MLE | Philadelphia Phillies | 69 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 24.4% | 9.0% | 15.4% | 2.1% | 3.30 | 3.33 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB MLE | Philadelphia Phillies | 69 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 24.4% | 9.0% | 15.4% | 2.1% | 3.30 | 3.33 | +0.9 |
| 2025 | 24 | MLB RAW | Philadelphia Phillies | 69 | 0 | 60 | 266 | 65 | 24 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 24.4% | 9.0% | 15.4% | 2.3% | 3.30 | 3.43 | +0.8 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 66 | 0 | 62 | 283 | 68 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.2% | 1.7% | 4.79 | 3.63 | +0.7 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 66 | 0 | 62 | 283 | 68 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.2% | 1.7% | 4.79 | 3.63 | +0.7 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 66 | 0 | 62 | 283 | 68 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 0.9 | 24.0% | 11.7% | 12.4% | 1.8% | 4.79 | 3.55 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 198 | 2 | 184 | 805 | 208 | 76 | 13 | 1% | 0.9 | 25.8% | 9.4% | 16.4% | 1.6% | 3.47 | 3.00 | +3.4 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | PHI | 51 | 0 | 54 | 228 | 58 | 24 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.6% | 10.4% | 15.1% | 2.3% | 3.77 | 3.90 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | PHI | 39 | 0 | 40 | 171 | 44 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.6% | 10.5% | 15.0% | 2.3% | 3.87 | 3.94 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | PHI | 31 | 0 | 33 | 139 | 35 | 15 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.4% | 10.7% | 14.8% | 2.4% | 3.96 | 4.02 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | PHI | 36 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 41 | 17 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.6% | 10.5% | 15.0% | 2.3% | 3.87 | 3.94 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | PHI | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 33 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.4% | 10.7% | 14.8% | 2.4% | 3.96 | 4.02 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 264 | 2 | 254 | 1100 | 283 | 107 | 20 | 1% | 1.0 | 25.7% | 9.7% | 16.0% | 1.8% | 3.59 | 3.16 | +4.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 208 | 2 | 200 | 867 | 223 | 84 | 16 | 1% | 1.0 | 25.7% | 9.7% | 16.0% | 1.8% | 3.59 | 3.16 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 261 | 2 | 253 | 1073 | 280 | 94 | 19 | 1% | 1.0 | 26.1% | 8.8% | 17.3% | 1.8% | 2.99 | 3.00 | +3.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 206 | 2 | 200 | 848 | 222 | 75 | 15 | 1% | 1.0 | 26.1% | 8.8% | 17.3% | 1.8% | 2.99 | 3.00 | +3.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAReading Fightin Phils · 22 IPFIP 1.90 → 2.75 (+0.85)K% 37.5% → 30.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.50% | — | ×0.810 | 30.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.68% | — | ×1.100 | 6.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷1.050 | ×1.200 | 2.60% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 1.90 → 2.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 20 IPFIP 2.57 → 4.00 (+1.42)K% 33.8% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.75% | — | ×0.770 | 25.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.50% | — | ×1.150 | 8.62% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.50% | ÷0.858 | ×1.250 | 3.64% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).
Result: FIP 2.57 → 4.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AClearwater Threshers · 10 IPFIP -0.88 → 0.31 (+1.19)K% 51.4% → 38.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 51.43% | — | ×0.740 | 38.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.86% | — | ×1.180 | 3.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP -0.88 → 0.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AClearwater Threshers · 6 IPFIP 1.07 → 1.60 (+0.53)K% 24.0% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.00% | — | ×0.740 | 17.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.180 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.07 → 1.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.6 | 52 | 25.7% | 10.2% | 0.74 | 3.63 |
| Antonio Osuna ('05) | 2.4 | 61 | 24.0% | 10.0% | 0.81 | 3.68 |
| Cam Bedrosian ('21) | 1.5 | 50 | 24.0% | 10.2% | 0.92 | 3.81 |
| Jeurys Familia ('23) | 2.8 | 62 | 24.1% | 11.1% | 0.71 | 3.58 |
| Carlos Diaz ('82-'86, 2 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 25.1%* | 8.7%* | 0.91* | 3.84* |
| Mike Schooler ('88-'93, 5 WAR*) | 1.5 | 49 | 26.9%* | 8.0%* | 0.96* | 3.68* |
| Ed Vosberg ('86-'02, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 21.0%* | 9.6%* | 0.86* | 4.06* |