Deretd Parra

P Lynchburg Hillcats

Age 27 RHP 6'3" / 160 lbs A

Overview

APROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	22	ROKDSL TEX Blue	15	6	43	1.87	1.92	26.2%	7.6%	—	K 17.8% · BB 9.4% · FIP 2.79
2023	23	ROKDSL Rangers R…	17	0	27	2.67	2.58	29.6%	16.0%	—	K 20.1% · BB 20.0% · FIP 3.93
2024	24	MIX2 levels	27	0	45	3.57	2.20	24.3%	9.4%	—	K 14.0% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.48
2027PROJ	27	MLBCLE	19	0	20	4.57	4.57	21.8%	10.3%	-0.0
2028PROJ36% MLB	28	MLBCLE	7	0	7	4.59	4.63	21.8%	10.3%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsLuis Mateo (age 27) · Jake Stinnett (age 27) · Grant Black (age 27)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 120112vR 104

ERA4.57

FIP4.57

K%21.8%

BB%10.3%

K-BB%11.5%

Proj IP20

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 20 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2019	19	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers 1	6	3	17	69	17	6	2	50%	2.8	16.8%	10.9%	5.9%	4.1%	4.32	5.29	—
2019	19	ROK RAW	DSL Rangers 1	6	3	17	69	17	6	2	50%	2.8	24.6%	8.7%	15.9%	2.9%	4.32	3.70	—
2021	21	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers 2	16	6	39	169	33	24	2	38%	2.5	13.3%	17.8%	-4.5%	1.4%	2.29	5.01	—
2021	21	ROK RAW	DSL Rangers 2	16	6	39	169	33	24	2	38%	2.5	19.5%	14.2%	5.3%	1.2%	2.29	3.91	—
2022	22	ROK MLE	DSL TEX Blue	15	6	43	172	45	13	0	40%	2.9	17.8%	9.4%	8.3%	0.0%	1.87	2.79	—
2022	22	ROK RAW	DSL TEX Blue	15	6	43	172	45	13	0	40%	2.9	26.2%	7.6%	18.6%	0.0%	1.87	1.92	—
2023	23	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers Red	17	0	27	125	37	20	0	0%	1.6	20.1%	20.0%	0.1%	0.0%	2.67	3.93	—
2023	23	ROK RAW	DSL Rangers Red	17	0	27	125	37	20	0	0%	1.6	29.6%	16.0%	13.6%	0.0%	2.67	2.58	—
2024	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	27	0	45	202	49	19	0	0%	1.7	14.0%	12.3%	1.7%	0.0%	3.57	3.48	—
2024	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	27	0	45	202	49	19	0	0%	1.7	14.0%	12.3%	1.7%	0.0%	3.57	3.48	—
2024	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	27	0	45	202	49	19	0	0%	1.7	24.3%	9.4%	14.9%	0.0%	3.57	2.20	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	27	MLB	CLE	19	0	20	84	18	9	2	0%	1.1	21.8%	10.3%	11.5%	3.0%	4.57	4.57	-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	28	MLB MLE	CLE	19	0	20	84	18	9	3	0%	1.1	21.8%	10.3%	11.5%	3.1%	4.59	4.63	-0.0
2028	28	MLB CTX	CLE	7	0	7	30	6	3	1	0%	1.0	21.8%	10.3%	11.5%	3.1%	4.59	4.63	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		7	0	7	31	7	3	1	0%	1.0	21.8%	10.3%	11.5%	3.1%	4.59	4.25	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	193	83	28	0%	1.1	21.8%	10.3%	11.5%	3.1%	4.59	4.25	+0.7
Career	—	MLE		81	15	172	737	118	104	5	19%	2.1	16.0%	14.1%	2.0%	0.7%	2.78	3.92	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		94	17	200	859	138	121	6	19%	2.1	16.0%	14.1%	2.0%	0.7%	2.78	3.92	-0.2

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Deretd Parra (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.57	21.8%	10.3%	3.0%	—	4.63	21.8%	11.5%	20	+0.06	—	—	—
Luis Mateo R 2017 · 4.60 FIP	27	SU	4.60	17.6%	11.2%	2.9%	.309	5.55	8.6%	-4.8%	43	+0.95	3.48	160	79
Jake Stinnett R 2019 · 4.23 FIP	27	SW	4.23	21.1%	12.2%	2.5%	.301	—	—	—	—	—	2.88	356	78
Grant Black R 2021 · 4.46 FIP	27	SW	4.46	19.0%	13.9%	2.2%	.327	5.35	15.0%	3.8%	156	+0.89	4.46	215	77
Coleman Huntley III R 2021 · 3.85 FIP	28	SW	3.85	20.2%	7.4%	2.8%	.348	3.56	23.4%	13.2%	86	-0.29	2.38	160	77
Spencer Bivens R 2022 · 4.86 FIP	28	SU	4.86	19.8%	13.5%	3.1%	.265	3.85	18.1%	10.3%	272	-1.01	3.52	391	77
Jarret Whorff R 2024 · 4.04 FIP	25	SU	4.04	18.9%	10.2%	2.3%	.271	4.52	19.6%	12.0%	123	+0.48	3.88	257	77
Fernando Rodriguez Jr. R 2011 · 3.85 FIP	27	SU	3.85	24.7%	10.8%	2.7%	.315	3.90	25.2%	16.5%	70	+0.05	3.34	335	77
Francisco Del Rosario R 2007 · 3.93 FIP	26	SU	3.93	19.7%	9.4%	2.4%	.356	—	—	—	—	—	3.93	194	77
Joe Colón J R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	27	SU	4.25	20.4%	12.1%	2.4%	.315	—	—	—	—	—	3.27	113	76
Emmanuel Chapman R 2024 · 4.08 FIP	25	SW	4.08	19.7%	10.6%	2.4%	.256	4.52	17.8%	1.3%	117	+0.44	3.81	198	76
Cody Tucker R 2024 · 4.97 FIP	25	SU	4.97	22.0%	12.0%	4.0%	.272	5.36	15.8%	-1.9%	40	+0.39	4.97	105	76
Derek Gordon R 2016 · 4.62 FIP	25	SW	4.62	19.9%	9.3%	3.7%	.315	—	—	—	—	—	4.62	146	76
Michael Dimock R 2017 · 4.12 FIP	27	SU	4.12	18.9%	7.8%	2.9%	.339	3.37	23.5%	12.8%	29	-0.75	3.08	166	76
Nolan Clenney R 2023 · 4.76 FIP	27	SU	4.76	23.0%	10.1%	4.2%	.341	4.58	17.2%	7.5%	71	-0.18	3.73	223	76
Tyler Yates R 2004 · 4.47 FIP	26	SW	4.47	15.4%	9.6%	2.6%	.333	3.64	22.5%	13.5%	116	-0.83	3.23	248	76
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	76
Austin Ross R 2016 · 3.81 FIP	27	SU	3.81	22.9%	8.0%	3.0%	.295	3.67	12.4%	5.2%	127	-0.14	3.16	269	75
Brad Deppermann R 2023 · 4.25 FIP	27	SU	4.25	22.7%	9.4%	3.4%	.417	2.87	19.5%	13.2%	71	-1.38	1.94	143	75
Jordan Milbrath R 2019 · 4.01 FIP	27	SU	4.01	21.5%	9.5%	2.8%	.284	—	—	—	—	—	3.19	386	75
Brian Sanches R 2006 · 5.30 FIP	27	SU	5.30	22.4%	10.2%	5.1%	.295	4.52	19.0%	10.1%	82	-0.78	3.39	229	75