Regi Grace
P Wichita Wind Surge| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 37 | 3 | 60 | 4.77 | 2.87 | 27.8% | 10.7% | — | K 20.9% · BB 12.2% · FIP 3.96 | |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 44 | 1 | 74 | 3.18 | 2.87 | 27.1% | 9.2% | — | K 21.6% · BB 10.1% · FIP 3.44 | |
| 2024 | 24 | AAMIN | 31 | 0 | 43 | 4.19 | 4.12 | 17.8% | 10.5% | — | K 14.4% · BB 11.5% · FIP 4.97 | |
| 2025 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBMIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.71 | 4.71 | 20.1% | 10.1% | -0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBMIN | 8 | 0 | 8 | 4.72 | 4.75 | 20.3% | 10.2% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | 6 | 1 | 11 | 49 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 17% | 1.8 | 16.3% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 0.0% | 5.06 | 2.76 | — |
| 2018 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Twins | 6 | 1 | 11 | 49 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 17% | 1.8 | 16.3% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 0.0% | 5.06 | 2.73 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | 6 | 5 | 21 | 100 | 24 | 9 | 1 | 83% | 3.5 | 16.3% | 11.2% | 5.1% | 1.4% | 5.14 | 3.92 | — |
| 2019 | 19 | ROK RAW | GCL Twins | 6 | 5 | 21 | 100 | 24 | 9 | 1 | 83% | 3.5 | 24.0% | 9.0% | 15.0% | 1.0% | 5.14 | 2.72 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 8 | 31 | 127 | 35 | 11 | 3 | 89% | 3.5 | 19.6% | 10.7% | 8.8% | 3.6% | 2.59 | 4.76 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 8 | 31 | 127 | 35 | 11 | 3 | 89% | 3.5 | 27.6% | 8.7% | 18.9% | 2.4% | 2.59 | 3.16 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 37 | 3 | 60 | 281 | 78 | 30 | 4 | 8% | 1.6 | 20.9% | 12.2% | 8.7% | 2.0% | 4.77 | 3.96 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 37 | 3 | 60 | 281 | 78 | 30 | 4 | 8% | 1.6 | 27.8% | 10.7% | 17.1% | 1.4% | 4.77 | 2.87 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 1 | 74 | 306 | 83 | 28 | 5 | 2% | 1.7 | 21.6% | 10.1% | 11.4% | 1.6% | 3.18 | 3.44 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 1 | 74 | 306 | 83 | 28 | 5 | 2% | 1.7 | 27.1% | 9.2% | 18.0% | 1.6% | 3.18 | 2.87 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 31 | 0 | 43 | 191 | 34 | 20 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 14.4% | 11.5% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 4.19 | 4.97 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 31 | 0 | 43 | 191 | 34 | 20 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 14.4% | 11.5% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 4.19 | 4.97 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA RAW | Wichita Wind Surge | 31 | 0 | 43 | 191 | 34 | 20 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.8% | 10.5% | 7.3% | 2.1% | 4.19 | 4.12 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | MIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.1% | 10.1% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 4.71 | 4.71 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIN | 20 | 0 | 21 | 87 | 18 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.3% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.75 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIN | 8 | 0 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.3% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.75 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 8 | 33 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.3% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.37 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 181 | 78 | 26 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.3% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 3.1% | 4.72 | 4.37 | +0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 133 | 18 | 240 | 1054 | 201 | 116 | 22 | 14% | 1.8 | 19.1% | 11.0% | 8.1% | 2.1% | 3.94 | 4.03 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 111 | 15 | 200 | 878 | 168 | 97 | 18 | 14% | 1.8 | 19.1% | 11.0% | 8.1% | 2.1% | 3.94 | 4.03 | -0.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAWichita Wind Surge · 43 IPFIP 4.07 → 4.97 (+0.90)K% 17.8% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.80% | — | ×0.810 | 14.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.47% | — | ×1.100 | 11.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.09% | ÷0.845 | ×1.200 | 2.97% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 4.07 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAWichita Wind Surge · 50 IPFIP 3.64 → 4.14 (+0.49)K% 24.4% → 19.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.42% | — | ×0.810 | 19.78% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.60% | — | ×1.100 | 11.66% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.30% | ÷1.231 | ×1.200 | 2.25% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 3.64 → 4.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 23 IPFIP 0.97 → 1.73 (+0.76)K% 33.7% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.71% | — | ×0.770 | 25.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.62% | — | ×1.150 | 6.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.134 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 0.97 → 1.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 57 IPFIP 2.86 → 3.96 (+1.11)K% 28.2% → 20.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.24% | — | ×0.740 | 20.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.31% | — | ×1.180 | 12.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.53% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 1.98% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.86 → 3.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AFort Myers Mighty Mussels · 29 IPFIP 3.38 → 4.76 (+1.38)K% 26.4% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.45% | — | ×0.740 | 19.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.180 | 10.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.48% | ÷0.908 | ×1.300 | 3.55% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.38 → 4.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Twins · 21 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.92 (+1.15)K% 24.0% → 16.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.00% | — | ×0.680 | 16.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.00% | — | ×1.250 | 11.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 1.40% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.92, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Twins · 11 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.46 (+0.70)K% 16.3% → 11.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.33% | — | ×0.680 | 11.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.16% | — | ×1.250 | 10.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).