Chance Huff

P Harrisburg Senators
Age 27 RHP 6'4" / 220 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
ETA2029MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202424A+WSH370504.295.4219.0%16.5%—K 14.7% · BB 18.9% · FIP 6.30
202525MIX2 levels435673.903.6819.1%11.3%—K 15.4% · BB 12.5% · FIP 4.31
202626MIX2 levels380456.454.5620.8%17.9%—K 17.7% · BB 16.4% · FIP 4.82
2027PROJ27MLBWSH1015.715.7115.8%16.3%-0.0
2028PROJ38% MLB28MLBWSH150165.625.6516.4%15.7%-0.2
2029PROJ56% MLB29MLBWSH180195.625.6916.7%15.5%-0.2
Next 3 projected WAR -0.4Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
Scouting grades · 20-80
Stuff40Control40Command35
Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 0.0 / P90 0.0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%
CompsJulian Arballo (age 27) · Trey Haley (age 26) · Gregory Infante (age 28)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 142133vR 125
ERA5.71
FIP5.71
K%15.8%
BB%16.3%
K-BB%-0.6%
Proj IP60
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 60 IP
K: -3.3 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-3KBB: -5.9 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-6BBCONTACT: -1.0 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +2.5 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+2STAMTotal WAR: -0.81 (60 IP)-0.8WAR
-0.8-0.22728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
STUF4040
CTRL4040
CMD3535
K†3040

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202222MIX MLE2 levels71103581114%1.422.9%2.9%20.0%2.9%0.933.10—
202222MIX RAW2 levels71103581114%1.422.9%2.9%20.0%2.9%0.933.10—
202323A+ MLEWilmington Blue Rocks2898437357371032%3.011.8%11.4%0.4%3.7%6.135.57—
202323A+ RAWWilmington Blue Rocks2898437357371032%3.015.3%9.9%5.4%2.7%6.134.62—
202424A+ MLEWilmington Blue Rocks37050231443870%1.414.7%18.9%-4.3%3.7%4.296.30—
202424A+ MLEWilmington Blue Rocks37050231443870%1.414.7%18.9%-4.3%3.7%4.296.30—
202424A+ RAWWilmington Blue Rocks37050231443870%1.419.0%16.5%2.6%3.0%4.295.42—
202525MIX MLE2 levels435672935633412%1.615.4%12.5%2.9%1.7%3.904.31—
202525MIX MLE2 levels435672935633412%1.615.4%12.5%2.9%1.7%3.904.31—
202525MIX RAW2 levels435672935633412%1.619.1%11.3%7.8%1.4%3.903.68—
202626MIX MLE2 levels38045212443830%1.217.7%16.4%1.3%2.1%6.454.82—
202626MIX MLE2 levels38045212443830%1.217.7%16.4%1.3%2.1%6.454.82—
202626MIX RAW2 levels38045212443830%1.220.8%17.9%2.8%1.4%6.454.56—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202727MLBWSH10141100%1.015.8%16.3%-0.6%2.7%5.715.71-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202828MLB MLEWSH40042176292850%1.016.4%15.7%0.6%2.9%5.625.65-0.5
202929MLB MLEWSH33034144242240%1.016.7%15.5%1.2%3.0%5.625.69-0.4
202828MLB CTXWSH1501668111120%1.116.4%15.7%0.6%2.9%5.625.65-0.2
202929MLB CTXWSH1801980131220%1.116.7%15.5%1.2%3.0%5.625.69-0.2
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW33035146242340%1.116.5%15.6%1.0%2.9%5.625.29-0.3
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844138133230%1.116.5%15.6%1.0%2.9%5.625.29-1.7
Career— MLE1531525511441681593310%1.714.7%13.9%0.8%2.9%5.045.18-1.0
/ 200 IP— MLE120122008961321242610%1.714.7%13.9%0.8%2.9%5.045.18-2.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AAHarrisburg Senators · 37 IPFIP 4.09 → 4.82 (+0.73)K% 21.8% → 17.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.84%—×0.81017.69%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.94%—×1.10016.44%
HR / BF /BF1.72%÷1.000×1.2002.07%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 4.09 → 4.82, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 7 IPFIP 5.77 → 6.67 (+0.91)K% 15.8% → 12.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.79%—×0.77012.16%
BB% (unintentional) /BF31.58%—×1.15036.32%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.2500.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 5.77 → 6.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AAHarrisburg Senators · 56 IPFIP 3.89 → 4.57 (+0.69)K% 19.4% → 15.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF19.42%—×0.81015.73%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.98%—×1.10013.18%
HR / BF /BF1.65%÷0.963×1.2002.06%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).

Result: FIP 3.89 → 4.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 11 IPFIP 2.60 → 3.10 (+0.49)K% 17.6% → 13.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF17.65%—×0.77013.59%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.84%—×1.1509.02%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.967×1.2500.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).

Result: FIP 2.60 → 3.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 50 IPFIP 5.24 → 6.30 (+1.07)K% 19.0% → 14.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF19.05%—×0.77014.67%
BB% (unintentional) /BF16.45%—×1.15018.92%
HR / BF /BF3.03%÷1.016×1.2503.73%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).

Result: FIP 5.24 → 6.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Wilmington Blue Rocks · 84 IPFIP 4.54 → 5.57 (+1.03)K% 15.3% → 11.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.28%—×0.77011.77%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.92%—×1.15011.41%
HR / BF /BF2.68%÷0.913×1.2503.67%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).

Result: FIP 4.54 → 5.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player162sIP/yrK%BB%HR/9ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION0.74516.2%15.9%1.105.66
Richie Lewis ('98)1.55918.1%14.1%1.384.88
Matt Anderson ('05)1.35119.3%13.5%1.055.19
Brian Bruney ('12)1.34321.2%15.8%0.944.68
Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*)1.24020.0%*12.5%*0.98*4.96*
Dwayne Henry ('84-'95, -1 WAR*)1.76723.8%*14.2%*0.90*5.02*
Lloyd Allen ('69-'75, -5 WAR*)1.55919.8%*13.9%*0.79*5.99*