Conor Grammes
P Amarillo Sod Poodles| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 40 | 6 | 59 | 3.51 | 3.66 | 31.1% | 16.7% | — | K 24.9% · BB 18.5% · FIP 4.11 | |
| 2024 | 27 | AAARI | 40 | 1 | 47 | 5.13 | 4.09 | 22.6% | 16.3% | — | K 18.3% · BB 17.9% · FIP 4.55 | |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 0 | 26 | 7.01 | 5.63 | 20.8% | 25.5% | — | K 15.3% · BB 26.9% · FIP 5.60 | |
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBARI | — | — | 0 | 5.80 | 5.80 | 18.9% | 18.9% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 31 | MLBARI | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5.77 | 5.85 | 18.9% | 18.3% | -0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Hillsboro Hops | 8 | 7 | 25 | 121 | 32 | 12 | 5 | 88% | 3.2 | 20.4% | 11.4% | 9.0% | 5.3% | 7.46 | 5.74 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ RAW | Hillsboro Hops | 8 | 7 | 25 | 121 | 32 | 12 | 5 | 88% | 3.2 | 26.4% | 9.9% | 16.5% | 4.1% | 7.46 | 4.56 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 37 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 28.6% | 16.8% | 11.8% | 3.3% | 9.15 | 4.64 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 37 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.4 | 37.0% | 14.0% | 23.0% | 3.0% | 9.15 | 3.46 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 6 | 59 | 264 | 82 | 44 | 5 | 15% | 1.5 | 24.9% | 18.5% | 6.4% | 1.4% | 3.51 | 4.11 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 40 | 6 | 59 | 264 | 82 | 44 | 5 | 15% | 1.5 | 31.1% | 16.7% | 14.4% | 1.9% | 3.51 | 3.66 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | AA MLE | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 40 | 1 | 47 | 221 | 50 | 36 | 3 | 2% | 1.2 | 18.3% | 17.9% | 0.4% | 1.3% | 5.13 | 4.55 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | AA MLE | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 40 | 1 | 47 | 221 | 50 | 36 | 3 | 2% | 1.2 | 18.3% | 17.9% | 0.4% | 1.3% | 5.13 | 4.55 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | AA RAW | Amarillo Sod Poodles | 40 | 1 | 47 | 221 | 50 | 36 | 3 | 2% | 1.2 | 22.6% | 16.3% | 6.3% | 1.4% | 5.13 | 4.09 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 26 | 149 | 31 | 38 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.3% | 26.9% | -11.5% | 0.7% | 7.01 | 5.60 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 26 | 149 | 31 | 38 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 15.3% | 26.9% | -11.5% | 0.7% | 7.01 | 5.60 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 26 | 149 | 31 | 38 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.8% | 25.5% | -4.7% | 0.7% | 7.01 | 5.63 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | ARI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.9% | 18.9% | -0.1% | 2.8% | 5.80 | 5.80 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | ARI | 14 | 0 | 15 | 62 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.9% | 18.3% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.77 | 5.85 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | ARI | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.9% | 18.3% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.77 | 5.85 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 4 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 18.9% | 18.3% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.77 | 5.48 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 173 | 173 | 43 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.9% | 18.3% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.77 | 5.48 | -2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 127 | 14 | 177 | 855 | 182 | 159 | 17 | 11% | 1.4 | 21.3% | 18.6% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 5.64 | 4.77 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 144 | 16 | 200 | 966 | 206 | 180 | 20 | 11% | 1.4 | 21.3% | 18.6% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 5.64 | 4.77 | -3.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 22 IPFIP 5.03 → 5.60 (+0.57)K% 18.9% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.90% | — | ×0.810 | 15.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 24.41% | — | ×1.100 | 26.85% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.79% | ÷1.333 | ×1.200 | 0.71% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 167).
Result: FIP 5.03 → 5.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAReno Aces · 4 IPFIP 4.44 → 4.42 (−0.03)K% 31.8% → 27.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.82% | — | ×0.860 | 27.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 31.82% | — | ×0.900 | 28.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.904 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 4.44 → 4.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 47 IPFIP 4.00 → 4.55 (+0.55)K% 22.6% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.62% | — | ×0.810 | 18.33% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.29% | — | ×1.100 | 17.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.36% | ÷1.229 | ×1.200 | 1.33% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 146).
Result: FIP 4.00 → 4.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 46 IPFIP 3.85 → 4.21 (+0.36)K% 31.4% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.40% | — | ×0.810 | 25.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.43% | — | ×1.100 | 18.07% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.42% | ÷1.637 | ×1.200 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 227).
Result: FIP 3.85 → 4.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hillsboro Hops · 13 IPFIP 2.80 → 3.72 (+0.91)K% 29.8% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.82% | — | ×0.770 | 22.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.54% | — | ×1.150 | 20.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 2.80 → 3.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Hillsboro Hops · 18 IPFIP 3.05 → 4.64 (+1.58)K% 37.1% → 28.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.08% | — | ×0.770 | 28.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.61% | — | ×1.150 | 16.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.25% | ÷0.848 | ×1.250 | 3.31% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 70).
Result: FIP 3.05 → 4.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Hillsboro Hops · 25 IPFIP 4.39 → 5.74 (+1.35)K% 26.4% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.45% | — | ×0.770 | 20.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.92% | — | ×1.150 | 11.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.13% | ÷0.972 | ×1.250 | 5.31% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 4.39 → 5.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).