Chad Bryant

P Rome Emperors

Age 27 RHP 6'0" / 210 lbs A+

Overview

A+PROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	23	AATL	27	44	6.18	4.63	24.3%	14.4%	—	K 18.0% · BB 16.9% · FIP 5.90
2024	24	A+ATL	9	19	6.63	5.78	17.7%	25.0%	—	K 13.6% · BB 28.7% · FIP 6.45
2027PROJ	27	MLBATL	10	11	5.06	5.06	21.8%	14.1%	-0.1
2028PROJ37% MLB	28	MLBATL	7	7	5.04	5.07	21.9%	13.8%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsGrant Black (age 27) · Spencer Bivens (age 28) · Jake Stinnett (age 27)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 129121vR 113

ERA5.06

FIP5.06

K%21.8%

BB%14.1%

K-BB%7.7%

Proj IP11

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 11 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2019	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	11	7	24	122	23	13	2	64%	2.2	12.8%	13.3%	-0.5%	2.3%	8.88	4.96	—
2019	19	ROK RAW	GCL Braves	11	7	24	122	23	13	2	64%	2.2	18.9%	10.7%	8.2%	1.6%	8.88	3.88	—
2021	21	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	13	9	31	165	33	29	5	69%	2.4	14.8%	20.7%	-5.9%	3.3%	6.61	6.29	—
2021	21	A RAW	Augusta GreenJackets	13	9	31	165	33	29	5	69%	2.4	20.0%	17.6%	2.4%	3.0%	6.61	5.84	—
2022	22	ROK MLE	FCL Braves	9	2	18	80	16	10	0	22%	2.0	13.6%	15.6%	-2.0%	0.0%	4.50	3.93	—
2022	22	ROK RAW	FCL Braves	9	2	18	80	16	10	0	22%	2.0	20.0%	12.5%	7.5%	0.0%	4.50	2.99	—
2023	23	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	27	0	44	202	49	29	6	0%	1.6	18.0%	16.9%	1.0%	4.0%	6.18	5.90	—
2023	23	A RAW	Augusta GreenJackets	27	0	44	202	49	29	6	0%	1.6	24.3%	14.4%	9.9%	3.0%	6.18	4.63	—
2024	24	A+ MLE	Rome Emperors	9	0	19	96	17	24	1	0%	2.1	13.6%	28.7%	-15.1%	1.6%	6.63	6.45	—
2024	24	A+ MLE	Rome Emperors	9	0	19	96	17	24	1	0%	2.1	13.6%	28.7%	-15.1%	1.6%	6.63	6.45	—
2024	24	A+ RAW	Rome Emperors	9	0	19	96	17	24	1	0%	2.1	17.7%	25.0%	-7.3%	1.0%	6.63	5.78	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	27	MLB	ATL	10	0	11	46	10	7	1	0%	1.1	21.8%	14.1%	7.7%	3.0%	5.06	5.06	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	28	MLB MLE	ATL	19	0	20	84	18	12	3	0%	1.1	21.9%	13.8%	8.1%	3.1%	5.04	5.07	-0.1
2028	28	MLB CTX	ATL	7	0	7	30	6	4	1	0%	1.0	21.9%	13.8%	8.1%	3.1%	5.04	5.07	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		7	0	7	31	7	4	1	0%	1.0	21.9%	13.8%	8.1%	3.1%	5.04	4.69	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	191	109	27	0%	1.1	21.9%	13.8%	8.1%	3.1%	5.04	4.69	-0.3
Career	—	MLE		69	18	136	665	100	125	18	26%	2.0	15.1%	18.8%	-3.7%	2.7%	6.60	5.67	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		101	26	200	976	147	183	26	26%	2.0	15.1%	18.8%	-3.7%	2.7%	6.60	5.67	-1.2

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Chad Bryant (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.06	21.8%	14.1%	3.0%	—	5.07	21.9%	8.1%	20	+0.01	—	—	—
Grant Black R 2021 · 4.46 FIP	27	SW	4.46	19.0%	13.9%	2.2%	.327	5.35	15.0%	3.8%	156	+0.89	4.46	215	81
Spencer Bivens R 2022 · 4.86 FIP	28	SU	4.86	19.8%	13.5%	3.1%	.265	3.85	18.1%	10.3%	272	-1.01	3.52	391	76
Jake Stinnett R 2019 · 4.23 FIP	27	SW	4.23	21.1%	12.2%	2.5%	.301	—	—	—	—	—	2.88	356	76
Luis Mateo R 2017 · 4.60 FIP	27	SU	4.60	17.6%	11.2%	2.9%	.309	5.55	8.6%	-4.8%	43	+0.95	3.48	160	75
Thad Weber R 2013 · 5.18 FIP	28	SU	5.18	16.4%	13.1%	3.3%	.244	4.52	12.2%	6.0%	308	-0.66	4.40	378	74
Logan Taylor R 2018 · 4.79 FIP	26	SU	4.79	17.2%	12.1%	2.9%	.316	—	—	—	—	—	3.55	300	74
Noah Denoyer R 2023 · 5.24 FIP	25	SW	5.24	22.2%	14.0%	4.1%	.306	—	—	—	—	—	3.26	181	74
Jeremy Guthrie R 2006 · 4.92 FIP	27	SU	4.92	15.1%	15.1%	2.1%	.349	4.57	14.8%	8.1%	566	-0.35	4.08	1,834	74
Tyler Yates R 2004 · 4.47 FIP	26	SW	4.47	15.4%	9.6%	2.6%	.333	3.64	22.5%	13.5%	116	-0.83	3.23	248	74
Ryan Conroy R 2022 · 4.75 FIP	25	SU	4.75	19.3%	12.6%	3.1%	.361	—	—	—	—	—	4.01	106	73
Tyler Davis R 2024 · 6.02 FIP	25	SU	6.02	21.0%	18.8%	4.2%	.317	3.78	21.9%	10.2%	111	-2.24	3.20	137	73
Derek Eitel R 2015 · 4.35 FIP	27	SU	4.35	18.1%	13.9%	1.8%	.338	4.26	19.7%	5.0%	113	-0.09	3.96	138	73
Joe Colón J R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	27	SU	4.25	20.4%	12.1%	2.4%	.315	—	—	—	—	—	3.27	113	73
Carlos Torres R 2010 · 4.50 FIP	27	SW	4.50	18.3%	11.3%	2.8%	.438	3.89	20.1%	13.2%	139	-0.61	2.89	604	73
Haden Erbe R 2024 · 5.28 FIP	25	SU	5.28	18.4%	16.5%	3.0%	.320	5.19	17.8%	0.5%	40	-0.09	5.19	116	73
Ronald Peña R 2019 · 4.55 FIP	27	SU	4.55	20.5%	12.6%	2.9%	.355	4.49	16.5%	6.1%	39	-0.06	3.72	187	72
Brian Glowicki R 2022 · 5.39 FIP	27	SU	5.39	18.2%	15.9%	3.3%	.229	—	—	—	—	—	2.31	189	72
Cole McDonald R 2024 · 5.01 FIP	27	SU	5.01	20.9%	12.7%	3.8%	.281	—	—	—	—	—	2.81	153	72
Dustin Antolin R 2017 · 4.35 FIP	27	SW	4.35	16.2%	14.4%	1.4%	.368	—	—	—	—	—	2.95	159	72
Travis Hissong R 2017 · 4.17 FIP	26	SU	4.17	20.3%	13.5%	2.0%	.308	—	—	—	—	—	3.01	122	72