Joe Vetrano
1B Tulsa Drillers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | ALAA | 127 | .243/.362/.318 | 1 | 1 | 42 | — | .177/.268/.239 |
| 2025 | 23 | A+LAD | 414 | .223/.315/.360 | 8 | 21 | 48 | — | .183/.252/.286 |
| 2026 | 24 | AALAD | 352 | .197/.274/.359 | 13 | 7 | 36 | — | .162/.219/.284 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 25 | MLBLAD | 4 | .172/.235/.284 | 0 | 0 | 47 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 26 | MLBLAD | 73 | .175/.239/.289 | 2 | 2 | 50 | -0.4 |
Tools · ContractCON 35 / POW 40
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 144 | 126 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 270 | 357 | 357 | 714 | 87 | 360 | 25 | 12 | 325 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 107 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 243 | 362 | 318 | 680 | 75 | 379 | 31 | 14 | 320 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 364 | 81 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 46 | 111 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 223 | 315 | 360 | 675 | 137 | 297 | 27 | 11 | 306 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 315 | 62 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 32 | 122 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 197 | 274 | 359 | 632 | 162 | 271 | 35 | 9 | 283 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 144 | 131 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 221 | 287 | 275 | 562 | 53 | 345 | 35 | 8 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 113 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 56 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 177 | 268 | 239 | 507 | 62 | 341 | 44 | 9 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 378 | 69 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 144 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 183 | 252 | 286 | 538 | 103 | 274 | 35 | 8 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 327 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 162 | 219 | 284 | 504 | 122 | 250 | 42 | 6 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 144 | 131 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 221 | 287 | 275 | 562 | 53 | 346 | 35 | 8 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 144 | 126 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 270 | 357 | 357 | 714 | 87 | 360 | 25 | 12 | 325 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 113 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 56 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 177 | 268 | 239 | 507 | 62 | 339 | 44 | 9 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 107 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 243 | 362 | 318 | 680 | 75 | 379 | 31 | 14 | 320 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 378 | 69 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 144 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 183 | 252 | 286 | 538 | 103 | 275 | 35 | 8 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ RAW | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 364 | 81 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 46 | 111 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 223 | 315 | 360 | 675 | 137 | 297 | 27 | 11 | 306 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 327 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 162 | 219 | 284 | 504 | 122 | 254 | 42 | 6 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA RAW | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 315 | 62 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 32 | 122 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 197 | 274 | 359 | 632 | 162 | 271 | 35 | 9 | 283 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 144 | 131 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 221 | 287 | 275 | 562 | 53 | 345 | 35 | 8 | 261 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 112 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 56 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 179 | 268 | 241 | 509 | 62 | 341 | 44 | 9 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 376 | 69 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 144 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 184 | 252 | 287 | 539 | 104 | 274 | 35 | 8 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 325 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 163 | 219 | 286 | 506 | 123 | 250 | 42 | 6 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 127 | 112 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 56 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 179 | 268 | 241 | 509 | 62 | 341 | 44 | 9 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 23 | A+ MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 414 | 376 | 69 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 32 | 144 | 3 | 21 | 5 | 184 | 252 | 287 | 539 | 104 | 274 | 35 | 8 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 24 | AA MLE | Tulsa Drillers | — | 352 | 325 | 53 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 149 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 163 | 219 | 286 | 506 | 123 | 250 | 42 | 6 | 221 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAD | 2% | 380 | 349 | 61 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 26 | 148 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 175 | 238 | 287 | 525 | 112 | 271 | 39 | 7 | 237 | 47 | -24 | +0 | +0 | -7 | +8 | -1.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB CTX | LAD | 2% | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 172 | 235 | 284 | 519 | 112 | 264 | 50 | 0 | 235 | 47 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAD | 31% | 235 | 215 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 90 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 178 | 242 | 292 | 534 | 114 | 271 | 38 | 7 | 242 | 50 | -14 | +0 | +0 | -4 | +5 | -1.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAD | 31% | 73 | 68 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 175 | 239 | 289 | 529 | 114 | 265 | 38 | 7 | 239 | 50 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.4 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 73 | 68 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 176 | 233 | 294 | 527 | 118 | 263 | 38 | 7 | 239 | 46 | -4 | +0 | +0 | -1 | +2 | -0.4 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 605 | 107 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 45 | 249 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 177 | 234 | 296 | 530 | 119 | 263 | 38 | 7 | 239 | 46 | -39 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -3.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1480 | 1355 | 242 | 40 | 8 | 27 | 109 | 570 | 9 | 39 | 15 | 179 | 244 | 280 | 524 | 101 | 282 | 39 | 7 | 236 | 46 | -27 | +0 | +0 | -8 | +10 | -2.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 595 | 107 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 48 | 250 | 4 | 17 | 7 | 180 | 246 | 284 | 530 | 104 | 284 | 38 | 7 | 236 | 46 | -40 | +1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -3.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AATulsa Drillers · 352 PAwOBA .275 → .221 (−55)K% 34.7% → 42.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.66% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 42.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 6.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.57% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.012 | 0.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 18.79% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 4.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×1.025 | ×1.012 | 0.51% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.74% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 5.45% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.
Result: wOBA .275 → .221; ISO .162 → .125; BABIP .271 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Great Lakes Loons · 414 PAwOBA .299 → .239 (−60)K% 26.8% → 34.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.81% | ÷0.980 | ×1.270 | — | — | 34.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.11% | ÷1.023 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 7.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.72% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.57% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.16% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.036 | ×0.998 | 19.18% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.11% | ÷0.927 | ×0.810 | ×1.036 | ×0.998 | 6.43% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.58% | ÷1.150 | ×0.850 | ×1.036 | ×0.998 | 1.21% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.16% | ÷0.992 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 2.54% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 100, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .299 → .239; ISO .137 → .107; BABIP .297 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 127 PAwOBA .309 → .231 (−78)K% 31.5% → 44.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.50% | ÷0.964 | ×1.360 | — | — | 44.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.39% | ÷0.943 | ×0.690 | — | — | 9.79% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.57% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 1.23% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.34% | ÷1.072 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | — | 28.25% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.48% | ÷0.973 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | — | 4.01% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.49% | ÷0.973 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | — | 1.47% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.49% | ÷1.072 | ×0.800 | — | — | 1.11% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 114, 2B 95, 3B 95, K 93, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .309 → .231; ISO .075 → .054; BABIP .379 → .341. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 144 PAwOBA .319 → .261 (−58)K% 25.0% → 34.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.00% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 34.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.81% | ÷0.976 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 8.47% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.11% | ÷0.955 | ×0.920 | ×0.996 | ×1.015 | 30.31% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.33% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×0.996 | ×1.015 | 2.82% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.11% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.996 | ×1.015 | 1.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.22% | ÷1.025 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 1.76% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 91, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 95, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.
Result: wOBA .319 → .261; ISO .087 → .067; BABIP .360 → .345. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).