Micah Pries
1B Columbus Clippers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 25 | AAACLE | 464 | .232/.330/.424 | 14 | 3 | 75 | — | .205/.285/.353 |
| 2024 | 26 | AAACLE | 264 | .227/.300/.366 | 8 | 4 | 42 | — | .184/.240/.273 |
| 2025 | 27 | AAACLE | 114 | .139/.230/.307 | 4 | 2 | 6 | — | .106/.177/.212 |
| 2027PROJ10% MLB | 29 | MLBCLE | 10 | .225/.294/.368 | 0 | 0 | 87 | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ27% MLB | 30 | MLBCLE | 41 | .223/.292/.362 | 1 | 1 | 84 | -0.1 |
Tools · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A+ | Lake County Captains | — | 179 | 161 | 43 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 55 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 267 | 341 | 447 | 788 | 180 | 364 | 31 | 7 | 351 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 91 | 75 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 320 | 404 | 547 | 951 | 227 | 393 | 21 | 10 | 403 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK | ACL Indians | — | 18 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 471 | 500 | 1.118 | 1.618 | 647 | 455 | 17 | 6 | 676 | 148 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA | Akron RubberDucks | — | 504 | 448 | 119 | 29 | 5 | 18 | 42 | 117 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 266 | 343 | 473 | 817 | 208 | 320 | 23 | 8 | 359 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 464 | 401 | 93 | 27 | 4 | 14 | 47 | 101 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 232 | 330 | 424 | 754 | 192 | 272 | 22 | 10 | 335 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 238 | 54 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 63 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 227 | 300 | 366 | 666 | 139 | 274 | 24 | 8 | 300 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 101 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 139 | 230 | 307 | 537 | 168 | 143 | 24 | 9 | 242 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lake County Captains | — | 179 | 165 | 33 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 72 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 200 | 263 | 315 | 578 | 115 | 325 | 40 | 4 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 91 | 81 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 272 | 337 | 469 | 806 | 198 | 332 | 29 | 5 | 329 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Indians | — | 18 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 294 | 333 | 588 | 922 | 294 | 324 | 22 | 6 | 387 | 148 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 504 | 463 | 106 | 26 | 5 | 14 | 27 | 147 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 229 | 287 | 397 | 685 | 168 | 297 | 29 | 5 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 464 | 414 | 85 | 23 | 4 | 10 | 34 | 120 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 205 | 285 | 353 | 637 | 147 | 255 | 26 | 7 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 245 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 81 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 184 | 240 | 273 | 513 | 90 | 248 | 31 | 5 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 104 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 106 | 177 | 212 | 389 | 106 | 125 | 30 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 288 | 263 | 59 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 102 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 224 | 287 | 369 | 656 | 144 | 333 | 35 | 5 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 288 | 253 | 75 | 13 | 4 | 12 | 22 | 77 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 296 | 371 | 522 | 892 | 225 | 380 | 27 | 8 | 388 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 504 | 463 | 106 | 26 | 5 | 14 | 27 | 147 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 229 | 287 | 397 | 685 | 168 | 302 | 29 | 5 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | — | 504 | 448 | 119 | 29 | 5 | 18 | 42 | 117 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 266 | 343 | 473 | 817 | 208 | 320 | 23 | 8 | 359 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 464 | 414 | 85 | 23 | 4 | 10 | 34 | 120 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 205 | 285 | 353 | 637 | 147 | 260 | 26 | 7 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | — | 464 | 401 | 93 | 27 | 4 | 14 | 47 | 101 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 232 | 330 | 424 | 754 | 192 | 272 | 22 | 10 | 335 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 245 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 81 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 184 | 240 | 273 | 513 | 90 | 250 | 31 | 5 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 238 | 54 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 63 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 227 | 300 | 366 | 666 | 139 | 274 | 24 | 8 | 300 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 104 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 106 | 177 | 212 | 389 | 106 | 132 | 30 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA RAW | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 101 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 27 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 139 | 230 | 307 | 537 | 168 | 143 | 24 | 9 | 242 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 288 | 263 | 59 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 102 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 224 | 287 | 369 | 656 | 144 | 327 | 35 | 5 | 286 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | — | 504 | 461 | 106 | 26 | 5 | 14 | 27 | 147 | 11 | 20 | 4 | 230 | 287 | 399 | 687 | 169 | 297 | 29 | 5 | 295 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 25 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 464 | 415 | 85 | 23 | 4 | 10 | 34 | 120 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 205 | 285 | 352 | 637 | 147 | 255 | 26 | 7 | 279 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 244 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 81 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 184 | 240 | 275 | 514 | 90 | 248 | 31 | 5 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 104 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 106 | 177 | 212 | 389 | 106 | 125 | 30 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 264 | 244 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 81 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 184 | 240 | 275 | 514 | 90 | 248 | 31 | 5 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Columbus Clippers | — | 114 | 104 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 34 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 106 | 177 | 212 | 389 | 106 | 125 | 30 | 6 | 177 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10% | 200 | 180 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 53 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 225 | 295 | 370 | 664 | 144 | 285 | 26 | 8 | 297 | 87 | -3 | +0 | +0 | -4 | +4 | -0.1 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 10% | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 225 | 294 | 368 | 663 | 143 | 285 | 30 | 10 | 296 | 87 | -0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 27% | 151 | 137 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 40 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 223 | 292 | 363 | 655 | 140 | 282 | 26 | 7 | 293 | 84 | -3 | +0 | -2 | -3 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 27% | 41 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 223 | 292 | 362 | 653 | 139 | 283 | 27 | 7 | 292 | 84 | -1 | +0 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 41 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 211 | 268 | 342 | 610 | 132 | 269 | 27 | 7 | 292 | 71 | -1 | +0 | -1 | -1 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 602 | 127 | 32 | 0 | 16 | 48 | 174 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 211 | 269 | 344 | 613 | 133 | 269 | 27 | 7 | 292 | 71 | -12 | +3 | -9 | -12 | +14 | -1.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1890 | 1721 | 358 | 75 | 17 | 45 | 115 | 552 | 41 | 47 | 16 | 208 | 274 | 350 | 624 | 142 | 276 | 29 | 6 | 274 | 71 | -4 | +0 | -2 | -5 | +6 | -0.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 592 | 123 | 26 | 6 | 15 | 40 | 190 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 208 | 274 | 348 | 622 | 140 | 276 | 29 | 6 | 274 | 71 | -11 | +0 | -5 | -12 | +14 | -1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAAColumbus Clippers · 114 PAwOBA .236 → .177 (−59)K% 23.7% → 29.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.68% | ÷0.956 | ×1.200 | — | — | 29.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.77% | ÷1.014 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 5.99% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.75% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 1.65% |
| Singles /BIP | 9.46% | ÷0.997 | ×0.930 | ×0.974 | ×1.003 | 8.62% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.35% | ÷1.064 | ×0.830 | ×0.974 | ×1.003 | 1.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.70% | ÷1.042 | ×0.970 | ×0.974 | ×1.003 | 2.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.41% | ÷1.093 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 3.47% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 99, 2B 113, 3B 108, K 91, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.
Result: wOBA .236 → .177; ISO .168 → .116; BABIP .143 → .125. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAColumbus Clippers · 264 PAwOBA .293 → .231 (−63)K% 23.9% → 30.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.86% | ÷0.939 | ×1.200 | — | — | 30.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.95% | ÷1.036 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 5.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.52% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 1.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.71% | ÷0.977 | ×0.930 | ×0.963 | ×1.018 | 20.26% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.00% | ÷0.985 | ×0.830 | ×0.963 | ×1.018 | 3.30% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.57% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×0.963 | ×1.018 | 0.60% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.57% | ÷1.060 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.018 | 3.07% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 95, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 88, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.
Result: wOBA .293 → .231; ISO .139 → .095; BABIP .274 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAColumbus Clippers · 464 PAwOBA .329 → .279 (−50)K% 21.8% → 25.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.77% | ÷1.008 | ×1.200 | — | — | 25.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.13% | ÷0.994 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 7.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.59% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 2.51% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.00% | ÷0.963 | ×0.930 | ×1.000 | ×1.033 | 15.97% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.00% | ÷1.018 | ×0.830 | ×1.000 | ×1.033 | 7.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.33% | ÷0.900 | ×0.970 | ×1.000 | ×1.033 | 1.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.67% | ÷1.037 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.033 | 3.25% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 93, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .329 → .279; ISO .192 → .151; BABIP .272 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAkron RubberDucks · 504 PAwOBA .348 → .295 (−54)K% 23.2% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.21% | ÷0.969 | ×1.220 | — | — | 29.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.54% | ÷0.995 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 5.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.18% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 1.88% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.24% | ÷1.052 | ×0.970 | ×1.003 | ×1.012 | 18.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.76% | ÷0.926 | ×0.860 | ×1.003 | ×1.012 | 8.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.51% | ÷0.980 | ×0.950 | ×1.003 | ×1.012 | 1.49% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.44% | ÷1.014 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 4.24% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 110, 2B 85, 3B 96, K 94, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.003.
Result: wOBA .348 → .295; ISO .208 → .171; BABIP .320 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Lake County Captains · 179 PAwOBA .342 → .254 (−88)K% 30.7% → 40.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.73% | ÷1.026 | ×1.350 | — | — | 40.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.70% | ÷1.017 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 4.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.35% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.998 | 2.71% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.36% | ÷1.041 | ×0.910 | ×1.044 | ×0.998 | 24.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.66% | ÷0.941 | ×0.830 | ×1.044 | ×0.998 | 5.20% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.94% | ÷0.900 | ×0.820 | ×1.044 | ×0.998 | 0.90% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.60% | ÷1.222 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 4.48% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 144, 1B 108, 2B 88, 3B 80, K 105, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.
Result: wOBA .342 → .254; ISO .180 → .119; BABIP .364 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ALynchburg Hillcats · 91 PAwOBA .398 → .329 (−68)K% 20.9% → 28.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.88% | ÷1.008 | ×1.360 | — | — | 28.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.79% | ÷1.024 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.87% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.30% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 2.55% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.21% | ÷1.014 | ×0.920 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 20.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷0.988 | ×0.830 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 10.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.57% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.980 | ×0.990 | 2.74% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.57% | ÷0.950 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 2.98% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 103, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 102, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.980.
Result: wOBA .398 → .329; ISO .227 → .189; BABIP .393 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKACL Indians · 18 PAwOBA .655 → .387 (−268)K% 16.7% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.67% | ÷0.978 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.56% | ÷1.050 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 3.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.57% | ÷0.948 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 23.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.065 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 7.14% | ÷0.990 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 5.01% |
| Home runs /BIP | 21.43% | ÷1.488 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 10.84% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 198, 1B 90, 2B 113, 3B 98, K 96, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .655 → .387; ISO .647 → .326; BABIP .455 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).