Ricky DeVito

P Pensacola Blue Wahoos
Age 28 RHP 6'3" / 195 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202324MIX3 levels270327.525.6120.1%19.5%—K 16.6% · BB 20.2% · FIP 6.00
202425AATEX410544.003.7930.0%21.5%—K 24.3% · BB 23.6% · FIP 4.53
202526AAMIA190284.233.6824.0%20.2%—K 19.5% · BB 22.2% · FIP 4.26
202627No MLB games played
2027PROJ28MLBMIA——05.445.4422.1%18.5%—
2028PROJ31% MLB29MLBMIA5055.405.4621.9%17.8%-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsSpencer Bivens (age 28) · Tyler Davis (age 25) · Jose De La Torre (age 27)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 136128vR 120
ERA5.44
FIP5.44
K%22.1%
BB%18.5%
K-BB%3.5%
Proj IP20
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 20 IP
K: -0.0 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -2.5 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-2BBCONTACT: -0.3 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.8 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.21 (20 IP)-0.2WAR
-0.2-0.12728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201920MIX MLE2 levels541883127280%3.510.2%10.3%-0.1%3.8%3.575.65—
201920MIX RAW2 levels541883127280%3.514.5%8.4%6.0%2.4%3.574.40—
202122A+ MLERome Braves5520912772100%4.122.8%8.8%14.0%3.2%2.664.04—
202122A+ RAWRome Braves5520912772100%4.129.7%7.7%22.0%2.2%2.662.76—
202223A+ MLEGreensboro Grasshoppers356703259043617%2.021.3%15.2%6.1%1.8%5.404.22—
202223A+ RAWGreensboro Grasshoppers356703259043617%2.027.7%13.2%14.5%1.8%5.403.49—
202324MIX MLE3 levels27032159323140%1.216.6%20.2%-3.6%3.2%7.526.00—
202324MIX RAW3 levels27032159323140%1.220.1%19.5%0.6%2.5%7.525.61—
202425AA MLEFrisco RoughRiders41054247745320%1.324.3%23.6%0.7%0.9%4.004.53—
202425AA MLEFrisco RoughRiders41054247745320%1.324.3%23.6%0.7%0.9%4.004.53—
202425AA RAWFrisco RoughRiders41054247745320%1.330.0%21.5%8.5%0.8%4.003.79—
202526AA MLEPensacola Blue Wahoos19028129312600%1.519.5%22.2%-2.7%0.0%4.234.26—
202526AA MLEPensacola Blue Wahoos19028129312600%1.519.5%22.2%-2.7%0.0%4.234.26—
202526AA RAWPensacola Blue Wahoos19028129312600%1.524.0%20.2%3.9%0.0%4.233.68—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202728MLBMIA——0——————22.1%18.5%3.5%2.7%5.445.44—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202829MLB MLEMIA1401564141120%1.121.9%17.8%4.1%2.9%5.405.46-0.2
202829MLB CTXMIA505215410%1.021.9%17.8%4.1%2.9%5.405.46-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW505204410%0.922.0%17.8%4.1%2.9%5.405.08-0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844169169420%1.122.0%17.8%4.1%2.9%5.405.08-1.2
Career— MLE1321522210342101851911%1.720.3%17.9%2.4%1.9%4.824.67-0.2
/ 200 IP— MLE119142009321891671711%1.720.3%17.9%2.4%1.9%4.824.67-2.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 28 IPFIP 3.62 → 4.26 (+0.64)K% 24.0% → 19.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.03%—×0.81019.47%
BB% (unintentional) /BF20.16%—×1.10022.17%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.103×1.2000.00%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).

Result: FIP 3.62 → 4.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 54 IPFIP 3.73 → 4.53 (+0.80)K% 30.0% → 24.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.96%—×0.81024.27%
BB% (unintentional) /BF21.46%—×1.10023.60%
HR / BF /BF0.81%÷1.080×1.2000.90%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).

Result: FIP 3.73 → 4.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Hickory Crawdads · 27 IPFIP 4.82 → 6.00 (+1.17)K% 21.6% → 16.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.60%—×0.77016.63%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.60%—×1.15020.24%
HR / BF /BF2.40%÷0.948×1.2503.17%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).

Result: FIP 4.82 → 6.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 3 IPFIP 7.81 → 8.94 (+1.13)K% 15.4% → 12.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.38%—×0.81012.46%
BB% (unintentional) /BF30.77%—×1.10033.85%
HR / BF /BF3.85%÷0.974×1.2004.74%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).

Result: FIP 7.81 → 8.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Greensboro Grasshoppers · 70 IPFIP 3.45 → 4.22 (+0.77)K% 27.7% → 21.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.69%—×0.77021.32%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.23%—×1.15015.22%
HR / BF /BF1.85%÷1.273×1.2501.81%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 155).

Result: FIP 3.45 → 4.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Rome Braves · 20 IPFIP 2.78 → 4.04 (+1.26)K% 29.7% → 22.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.67%—×0.77022.85%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.69%—×1.1508.85%
HR / BF /BF2.20%÷0.864×1.2503.18%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).

Result: FIP 2.78 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ARome Braves · 17 IPFIP 4.42 → 5.65 (+1.23)K% 13.8% → 10.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF13.75%—×0.74010.18%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.75%—×1.18010.32%
HR / BF /BF2.50%÷0.851×1.3003.82%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 70).

Result: FIP 4.42 → 5.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).