Gustavo Rodriguez
P Las Vegas Aviators| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 22 | 0 | 33 | 4.32 | 2.65 | 22.9% | 9.2% | — | K 18.4% · BB 10.6% · FIP 2.89 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX3 levels | 39 | 0 | 44 | 1.64 | 2.90 | 28.4% | 12.6% | — | K 22.6% · BB 13.8% · FIP 3.68 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 19 | 1 | 25 | 2.55 | 2.29 | 24.0% | 9.6% | — | K 18.9% · BB 9.9% · FIP 2.76 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBOAK | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.43 | 4.43 | 21.0% | 11.0% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 27 | MLBOAK | 12 | 0 | 13 | 4.44 | 4.46 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals Red | 8 | 1 | 12 | 54 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12% | 1.5 | 5.0% | 18.5% | -13.5% | 0.0% | 2.25 | 5.02 | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals Red | 8 | 1 | 12 | 54 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12% | 1.5 | 7.4% | 14.8% | -7.4% | 0.0% | 2.25 | 4.43 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cardinals Blue | 12 | 12 | 57 | 234 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 100% | 4.8 | 15.4% | 5.9% | 9.5% | 0.6% | 2.04 | 2.87 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Cardinals Blue | 12 | 12 | 57 | 234 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 100% | 4.8 | 22.6% | 4.7% | 17.9% | 0.4% | 2.04 | 2.05 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 11 | 48 | 233 | 52 | 30 | 4 | 52% | 2.3 | 15.6% | 16.3% | -0.8% | 2.2% | 7.26 | 5.04 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 11 | 48 | 233 | 52 | 30 | 4 | 52% | 2.3 | 22.3% | 12.9% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 7.26 | 3.89 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Palm Beach Cardinals | 27 | 1 | 58 | 233 | 66 | 25 | 4 | 4% | 2.1 | 21.0% | 12.7% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 2.65 | 4.32 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Palm Beach Cardinals | 27 | 1 | 58 | 233 | 66 | 25 | 4 | 4% | 2.1 | 28.3% | 10.7% | 17.6% | 1.7% | 2.65 | 3.01 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 0 | 70 | 314 | 75 | 37 | 7 | 0% | 1.8 | 17.9% | 14.1% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 4.86 | 4.84 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 40 | 0 | 70 | 314 | 75 | 37 | 7 | 0% | 1.8 | 23.9% | 11.8% | 12.1% | 2.2% | 4.86 | 3.84 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 33 | 153 | 35 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.4% | 10.6% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 4.32 | 2.89 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 33 | 153 | 35 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.4% | 10.6% | 7.8% | 0.0% | 4.32 | 2.89 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 0 | 33 | 153 | 35 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 22.9% | 9.2% | 13.7% | 0.7% | 4.32 | 2.65 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 39 | 0 | 44 | 183 | 52 | 23 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.6% | 13.8% | 8.8% | 1.4% | 1.64 | 3.68 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 39 | 0 | 44 | 183 | 52 | 23 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.6% | 13.8% | 8.8% | 1.4% | 1.64 | 3.68 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 39 | 0 | 44 | 183 | 52 | 23 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 28.4% | 12.6% | 15.8% | 1.1% | 1.64 | 2.90 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 19 | 1 | 25 | 104 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 5% | 1.3 | 18.9% | 9.9% | 9.0% | 0.0% | 2.55 | 2.76 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 19 | 1 | 25 | 104 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 5% | 1.3 | 18.9% | 9.9% | 9.0% | 0.0% | 2.55 | 2.76 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 19 | 1 | 25 | 104 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 5% | 1.3 | 24.0% | 9.6% | 14.4% | 0.0% | 2.55 | 2.29 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | OAK | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.0% | 11.0% | 10.0% | 2.4% | 4.43 | 4.43 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | OAK | 29 | 0 | 31 | 130 | 28 | 14 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 10.3% | 2.5% | 4.44 | 4.46 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | OAK | 12 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 10.3% | 2.5% | 4.44 | 4.46 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 13 | 0 | 13 | 55 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 10.3% | 2.5% | 4.44 | 4.08 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 183 | 91 | 15 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.2% | 10.9% | 10.3% | 2.5% | 4.44 | 4.08 | +1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 188 | 26 | 348 | 1508 | 269 | 187 | 23 | 14% | 1.8 | 17.8% | 12.4% | 5.4% | 1.5% | 3.65 | 4.01 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 108 | 15 | 200 | 867 | 155 | 108 | 13 | 14% | 1.8 | 17.8% | 12.4% | 5.4% | 1.5% | 3.65 | 4.01 | +0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 19 IPFIP 2.64 → 2.76 (+0.12)K% 22.0% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.95% | — | ×0.860 | 18.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.98% | — | ×0.900 | 9.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.64 → 2.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Athletics · 6 IPFIP 0.99 → 1.99 (+1.00)K% 31.8% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.82% | — | ×0.680 | 21.64% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×1.250 | 5.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 0.99 → 1.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 32 IPFIP 3.62 → 3.68 (+0.06)K% 26.3% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.28% | — | ×0.860 | 22.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.33% | — | ×0.900 | 13.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.46% | ÷1.183 | ×1.100 | 1.36% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.62 → 3.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAMidland RockHounds · 6 IPFIP 0.01 → 0.74 (+0.73)K% 42.3% → 34.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 42.31% | — | ×0.810 | 34.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.85% | — | ×1.100 | 4.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.043 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 0.01 → 0.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 6 IPFIP 1.62 → 2.20 (+0.58)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.150 | 5.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.921 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 1.62 → 2.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Peoria Chiefs · 23 IPFIP 2.25 → 2.89 (+0.64)K% 23.9% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.85% | — | ×0.770 | 18.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.17% | — | ×1.150 | 10.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.993 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 2.25 → 2.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 APalm Beach Cardinals · 11 IPFIP 3.77 → 4.75 (+0.97)K% 20.5% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.45% | — | ×0.740 | 15.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.180 | 10.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷1.036 | ×1.300 | 2.85% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 3.77 → 4.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Peoria Chiefs · 67 IPFIP 3.97 → 4.84 (+0.87)K% 23.3% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.26% | — | ×0.770 | 17.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.29% | — | ×1.150 | 14.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷1.093 | ×1.250 | 2.66% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 3.97 → 4.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).