Yohanse Morel
P Hickory Crawdads| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | A+TEX | 32 | 2 | 47 | 2.49 | 3.25 | 27.4% | 12.9% | — | K 21.1% · BB 14.9% · FIP 4.29 |
| 2024 | 23 | A+TEX | 17 | 0 | 21 | 10.55 | 6.10 | 22.8% | 14.9% | — | K 17.5% · BB 17.1% · FIP 7.13 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBTEX | — | — | 0 | 4.68 | 4.68 | 22.4% | 11.3% | — | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBTEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.67 | 4.69 | 22.5% | 11.1% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 17 | ROK MLE | AZL Royals | 13 | 8 | 47 | 205 | 52 | 17 | 1 | 62% | 3.6 | 17.2% | 10.4% | 6.9% | 0.7% | 4.02 | 3.33 | — |
| 2018 | 17 | ROK RAW | AZL Royals | 13 | 8 | 47 | 205 | 52 | 17 | 1 | 62% | 3.6 | 25.4% | 8.3% | 17.1% | 0.5% | 4.02 | 2.25 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | A MLE | Lexington Legends | 14 | 11 | 52 | 248 | 57 | 21 | 7 | 79% | 3.7 | 17.0% | 10.0% | 7.0% | 3.3% | 6.02 | 4.77 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | A RAW | Lexington Legends | 14 | 11 | 52 | 248 | 57 | 21 | 7 | 79% | 3.7 | 23.0% | 8.5% | 14.5% | 2.8% | 6.02 | 3.86 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | 30 | 2 | 50 | 232 | 45 | 31 | 8 | 7% | 1.7 | 14.9% | 15.4% | -0.4% | 4.3% | 6.66 | 6.12 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | A+ RAW | Quad Cities River Bandits | 30 | 2 | 50 | 232 | 45 | 31 | 8 | 7% | 1.7 | 19.4% | 13.4% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 6.66 | 5.24 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A+ MLE | Hickory Crawdads | 33 | 0 | 46 | 222 | 51 | 22 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.7% | 11.4% | 6.3% | 2.0% | 5.72 | 4.15 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A+ RAW | Hickory Crawdads | 33 | 0 | 46 | 222 | 51 | 22 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 23.0% | 9.9% | 13.1% | 1.8% | 5.72 | 3.45 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ MLE | Hickory Crawdads | 32 | 2 | 47 | 201 | 55 | 26 | 3 | 6% | 1.5 | 21.1% | 14.9% | 6.2% | 2.0% | 2.49 | 4.29 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A+ RAW | Hickory Crawdads | 32 | 2 | 47 | 201 | 55 | 26 | 3 | 6% | 1.5 | 27.4% | 12.9% | 14.4% | 1.5% | 2.49 | 3.25 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Hickory Crawdads | 17 | 0 | 21 | 101 | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 17.5% | 17.1% | 0.5% | 6.1% | 10.55 | 7.13 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Hickory Crawdads | 17 | 0 | 21 | 101 | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 17.5% | 17.1% | 0.5% | 6.1% | 10.55 | 7.13 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | Hickory Crawdads | 17 | 0 | 21 | 101 | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.3 | 22.8% | 14.9% | 7.9% | 5.0% | 10.55 | 6.10 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | TEX | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.68 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | TEX | 16 | 0 | 17 | 72 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.69 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | TEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.69 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.31 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 193 | 96 | 32 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.5% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.31 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 139 | 23 | 263 | 1209 | 212 | 154 | 34 | 17% | 1.9 | 17.5% | 12.7% | 4.7% | 2.8% | 5.47 | 4.79 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 106 | 17 | 200 | 918 | 161 | 117 | 26 | 17% | 1.9 | 17.5% | 12.7% | 4.7% | 2.8% | 5.47 | 4.79 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Hickory Crawdads · 21 IPFIP 5.78 → 7.13 (+1.36)K% 22.8% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.77% | — | ×0.770 | 17.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.85% | — | ×1.150 | 17.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.95% | ÷1.014 | ×1.250 | 6.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 5.78 → 7.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hickory Crawdads · 47 IPFIP 3.25 → 4.29 (+1.04)K% 27.4% → 21.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.36% | — | ×0.770 | 21.07% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.94% | — | ×1.150 | 14.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.49% | ÷0.948 | ×1.250 | 1.97% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.25 → 4.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Hickory Crawdads · 46 IPFIP 3.40 → 4.15 (+0.75)K% 23.0% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.97% | — | ×0.770 | 17.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.91% | — | ×1.150 | 11.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.80% | ÷1.123 | ×1.250 | 2.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 3.40 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 50 IPFIP 5.05 → 6.12 (+1.07)K% 19.4% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.40% | — | ×0.770 | 14.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.36% | — | ×1.150 | 15.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.45% | ÷1.013 | ×1.250 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 5.05 → 6.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ALexington Legends · 52 IPFIP 3.78 → 4.77 (+0.99)K% 23.0% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.98% | — | ×0.740 | 17.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.47% | — | ×1.180 | 9.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.82% | ÷1.095 | ×1.300 | 3.35% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 119).
Result: FIP 3.78 → 4.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKAZL Royals · 47 IPFIP 2.28 → 3.33 (+1.06)K% 25.4% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.37% | — | ×0.680 | 17.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.29% | — | ×1.250 | 10.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.49% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.68% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.28 → 3.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).