Jake Palisch
P Birmingham Barons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | AACWS | 38 | 0 | 50 | 3.75 | 4.35 | 16.7% | 6.7% | — | K 13.6% · BB 7.4% · FIP 5.25 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 30 | 13 | 106 | 2.29 | 3.18 | 15.9% | 6.2% | 1.8 | K 13.0% · BB 6.9% · FIP 3.88 |
| 2026 | 27 | AACWS | 25 | 21 | 119 | 4.92 | 4.64 | 10.6% | 8.7% | — | K 8.6% · BB 9.6% · FIP 5.06 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBCWS | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5.31 | 5.31 | 10.0% | 9.1% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBCWS | 15 | 0 | 16 | 5.29 | 5.34 | 11.1% | 9.4% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 30 | MLBCWS | 20 | 0 | 21 | 5.35 | 5.44 | 11.7% | 9.7% | -0.2 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 70.6% | 5.9% | 64.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -2.12 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 70.6% | 5.9% | 64.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -1.10 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | 36 | 0 | 42 | 183 | 50 | 13 | 5 | 0% | 1.2 | 21.0% | 8.2% | 12.9% | 3.4% | 5.31 | 4.20 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ RAW | Winston-Salem Dash | 36 | 0 | 42 | 183 | 50 | 13 | 5 | 0% | 1.2 | 27.3% | 7.1% | 20.2% | 2.7% | 5.31 | 3.19 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 38 | 0 | 50 | 209 | 35 | 14 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 13.6% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 3.75 | 5.25 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 38 | 0 | 50 | 209 | 35 | 14 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 13.6% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 3.75 | 5.25 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | AA RAW | Birmingham Barons | 38 | 0 | 50 | 209 | 35 | 14 | 7 | 0% | 1.3 | 16.7% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 3.3% | 3.75 | 4.35 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 13 | 106 | 422 | 67 | 26 | 5 | 43% | 3.5 | 13.0% | 6.9% | 6.2% | 1.8% | 2.29 | 3.88 | +0.8 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 13 | 106 | 422 | 67 | 26 | 5 | 43% | 3.5 | 13.0% | 6.9% | 6.2% | 1.8% | 2.29 | 3.88 | +0.8 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 13 | 106 | 422 | 67 | 26 | 5 | 43% | 3.5 | 15.9% | 6.2% | 9.7% | 1.2% | 2.29 | 3.18 | +1.8 |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 25 | 21 | 119 | 538 | 57 | 47 | 12 | 84% | 4.8 | 8.6% | 9.6% | -1.0% | 2.7% | 4.92 | 5.06 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA MLE | Birmingham Barons | 25 | 21 | 119 | 538 | 57 | 47 | 12 | 84% | 4.8 | 8.6% | 9.6% | -1.0% | 2.7% | 4.92 | 5.06 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | AA RAW | Birmingham Barons | 25 | 21 | 119 | 538 | 57 | 47 | 12 | 84% | 4.8 | 10.6% | 8.7% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 4.92 | 4.64 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.00 | 3.10 | +0.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | CWS | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 10.0% | 9.1% | 0.9% | 2.8% | 5.31 | 5.31 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | CWS | 49 | 0 | 52 | 219 | 24 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 1.1 | 11.1% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 5.29 | 5.34 | -0.4 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | CWS | 40 | 0 | 42 | 176 | 21 | 17 | 6 | 0% | 1.0 | 11.7% | 9.7% | 2.0% | 3.1% | 5.35 | 5.44 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | CWS | 15 | 0 | 16 | 68 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 11.1% | 9.4% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 5.29 | 5.34 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | CWS | 20 | 0 | 21 | 89 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 11.7% | 9.7% | 2.0% | 3.1% | 5.35 | 5.44 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 37 | 0 | 39 | 165 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 11.0% | 9.2% | 1.8% | 2.9% | 5.65 | 4.95 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 191 | 0 | 200 | 854 | 93 | 77 | 26 | 0% | 1.0 | 11.0% | 9.2% | 1.8% | 2.9% | 5.65 | 4.95 | -0.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 134 | 34 | 323 | 1369 | 180 | 112 | 37 | 25% | 2.4 | 13.2% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 2.7% | 3.85 | 4.52 | -0.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 83 | 21 | 200 | 849 | 112 | 69 | 23 | 25% | 2.4 | 13.2% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 2.7% | 3.85 | 4.52 | -1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AABirmingham Barons · 119 IPFIP 4.54 → 5.06 (+0.53)K% 10.6% → 8.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 10.59% | — | ×0.810 | 8.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.74% | — | ×1.100 | 9.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.23% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.54 → 5.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AABirmingham Barons · 105 IPFIP 3.19 → 3.88 (+0.69)K% 16.1% → 13.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.11% | — | ×0.810 | 13.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.25% | — | ×1.100 | 6.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.20% | ÷0.784 | ×1.200 | 1.84% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 57).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABirmingham Barons · 50 IPFIP 4.37 → 5.25 (+0.87)K% 16.7% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.75% | — | ×0.810 | 13.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.70% | — | ×1.100 | 7.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.35% | ÷0.935 | ×1.200 | 4.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 5.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 42 IPFIP 3.19 → 4.20 (+1.01)K% 27.3% → 21.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.32% | — | ×0.770 | 21.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.10% | — | ×1.150 | 8.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.73% | ÷1.017 | ×1.250 | 3.36% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 4.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.8 | 56 | 10.7% | 9.3% | 1.12 | 5.39 |
| Brian Stokes ('10) | 1.0 | 52 | 14.5% | 10.1% | 1.22 | 5.27 |
| Eric Gunderson ('00) | 1.1 | 76 | 13.3% | 8.1% | 1.14 | 4.95 |
| Rodney Myers ('04) | 1.2 | 60 | 15.0% | 10.3% | 1.05 | 5.07 |
| Russ Swan ('89-'94, -2 WAR*) | 1.3 | 89 | 12.3%* | 9.9%* | 1.13* | 5.09* |
| Greg Booker ('83-'90, -1 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 13.3%* | 10.2%* | 1.07* | 4.51* |
| Mike Barlow ('75-'81, -2 WAR*) | 1.2 | 62 | 14.0%* | 9.4%* | 0.76* | 4.97* |