Noah Syndergaard
P ACL White Sox| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 29 | MLBPHI | 25 | 24 | 135 | 3.94 | 3.73 | 16.8% | 5.5% | 2.7 | ||
| 2023 | 30 | MIX2 levels | 20 | 20 | 99 | 6.39 | 5.41 | 14.9% | 4.4% | -0.0 | K 14.3% · BB 4.9% · FIP 5.60 | |
| 2025 | 32 | MIX2 levels | 6 | 6 | 23 | 5.40 | 4.94 | 14.7% | 2.1% | — | K 13.6% · BB 2.1% · FIP 2.22 | |
| 2026 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 34 | MLBCWS | — | — | 0 | 4.28 | 4.27 | 23.5% | 9.0% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ | 35 | MLBCWS | 3 | 3 | 20 | 4.51 | 4.64 | 22.6% | 9.6% | 0.2 | ||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 180 | 716 | 200 | 37 | 21 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.4% | 5.2% | 22.1% | 2.9% | 3.01 | 3.06 | +5.3 |
| 2015 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 180 | 716 | 200 | 37 | 21 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.9% | 5.2% | 22.8% | 2.9% | 3.01 | 3.01 | +5.4 |
| 2016 | 23 | MLB MLE | New York Mets | 31 | 30 | 184 | 744 | 218 | 41 | 11 | 97% | 5.9 | 29.3% | 5.5% | 23.8% | 1.5% | 2.60 | 2.14 | +7.9 |
| 2016 | 23 | MLB RAW | New York Mets | 31 | 30 | 184 | 744 | 218 | 41 | 11 | 97% | 5.9 | 29.3% | 5.5% | 23.8% | 1.5% | 2.60 | 2.17 | +7.8 |
| 2017 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 8 | 8 | 31 | 130 | 36 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 3.9 | 27.4% | 1.6% | 25.8% | 0.0% | 2.87 | 0.99 | +1.8 |
| 2017 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 8 | 8 | 31 | 130 | 36 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 3.9 | 27.7% | 1.5% | 26.2% | 0.0% | 2.87 | 0.99 | +1.8 |
| 2018 | 25 | MLB MLE | New York Mets | 25 | 25 | 154 | 644 | 155 | 37 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.1% | 5.7% | 18.3% | 1.4% | 3.03 | 2.56 | +5.7 |
| 2018 | 25 | MLB RAW | New York Mets | 25 | 25 | 154 | 644 | 155 | 37 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.1% | 5.7% | 18.3% | 1.4% | 3.03 | 2.57 | +5.7 |
| 2019 | 26 | MLB MLE | New York Mets | 32 | 32 | 198 | 825 | 202 | 48 | 24 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.5% | 5.8% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 4.28 | 3.37 | +5.0 |
| 2019 | 26 | MLB RAW | New York Mets | 32 | 32 | 198 | 825 | 202 | 48 | 24 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.5% | 5.8% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 4.28 | 3.36 | +5.0 |
| 2021 | 28 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 7 | 7 | 10 | 38 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 1.4 | 28.9% | 2.6% | 26.3% | 5.3% | 2.70 | 3.88 | +0.2 |
| 2021 | 28 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 7 | 7 | 10 | 38 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 1.4 | 28.9% | 2.6% | 26.3% | 5.3% | 2.70 | 3.80 | +0.2 |
| 2022 | 29 | MLB MLE | Philadelphia Phillies | 25 | 24 | 135 | 565 | 95 | 31 | 14 | 96% | 5.4 | 16.8% | 5.5% | 11.3% | 2.3% | 3.94 | 3.64 | +2.9 |
| 2022 | 29 | MLB RAW | Philadelphia Phillies | 25 | 24 | 135 | 565 | 95 | 31 | 14 | 96% | 5.4 | 16.8% | 5.5% | 11.3% | 2.5% | 3.94 | 3.73 | +2.7 |
| 2023 | 30 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 99 | 430 | 64 | 19 | 23 | 100% | 4.9 | 14.3% | 4.9% | 9.5% | 5.6% | 6.39 | 5.60 | -0.2 |
| 2023 | 30 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 99 | 430 | 64 | 19 | 23 | 100% | 4.9 | 14.9% | 4.4% | 10.5% | 5.3% | 6.39 | 5.41 | -0.0 |
| 2025 | 32 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 23 | 95 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 3.9 | 13.6% | 2.1% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 5.40 | 2.22 | — |
| 2025 | 32 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 23 | 95 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 3.9 | 13.6% | 2.1% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 5.40 | 2.22 | — |
| 2025 | 32 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 23 | 95 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 3.9 | 14.7% | 2.1% | 12.6% | 5.3% | 5.40 | 4.94 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 164 | 162 | 941 | 3904 | 928 | 207 | 100 | 99% | 5.7 | 23.8% | 5.3% | 18.5% | 2.6% | 3.71 | 3.17 | +26.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 34 | MLB | CWS | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.5% | 9.0% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 4.27 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 35 | MLB MLE | CWS | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 22.6% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 3.3% | 4.48 | 4.61 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 35 | MLB CTX | CWS | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 22.6% | 9.6% | 13.0% | 3.4% | 4.51 | 4.64 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 167 | 165 | 961 | 3988 | 947 | 215 | 103 | 99% | 5.8 | 23.7% | 5.4% | 18.4% | 2.6% | 3.73 | 3.19 | +26.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 34 | 200 | 830 | 197 | 45 | 21 | 99% | 5.7 | 23.7% | 5.4% | 18.4% | 2.6% | 3.73 | 3.19 | +5.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 183 | 181 | 1013 | 4187 | 987 | 220 | 104 | 99% | 5.5 | 23.6% | 5.3% | 18.3% | 2.5% | 3.69 | 3.15 | +26.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 36 | 36 | 200 | 826 | 195 | 43 | 21 | 99% | 5.5 | 23.6% | 5.3% | 18.3% | 2.5% | 3.69 | 3.15 | +5.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 ROKACL White Sox · 15 IPFIP 1.62 → 2.22 (+0.59)K% 20.0% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.680 | 13.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 1.67% | — | ×1.250 | 2.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.128 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 1.62 → 2.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAACharlotte Knights · 8 IPFIP 10.82 → 9.55 (−1.27)K% 5.7% → 4.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 5.71% | — | ×0.860 | 4.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.86% | — | ×0.900 | 2.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 14.29% | ÷1.320 | ×1.100 | 11.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 164).
Result: FIP 10.82 → 9.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 10 IPFIP 2.78 → 3.15 (+0.37)K% 20.5% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.51% | — | ×0.860 | 17.64% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×0.900 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.006 | ×1.100 | 2.80% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 2.78 → 3.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAALas Vegas 51s · 30 IPFIP 2.43 → 2.78 (+0.35)K% 30.1% → 26.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.09% | — | ×0.880 | 26.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.08% | — | ×1.050 | 7.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.77% | ÷1.099 | ×1.100 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 2.43 → 2.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.8 | 108 | 23.7% | 5.6% | 1.00 | 3.73 |
| Pablo López ('25) | 4.8 | 121 | 24.9% | 6.3% | 1.07 | 3.81 |
| Hyun Jin Ryu ('23) | 5.3 | 117 | 21.5% | 5.4% | 0.99 | 3.27 |
| James Paxton ('24) | 4.8 | 95 | 25.3% | 7.9% | 1.05 | 3.77 |
| Roger Nelson ('67-'76, 10 WAR*) | 3.2 | 106 | 19.5%* | 7.1%* | 0.98* | 3.88* |
| Ed Halicki ('74-'80, 11 WAR*) | 5.3 | 152 | 22.9%* | 7.2%* | 1.10* | 4.18* |
| Chris Bosio ('86-'96, 24 WAR*) | 8.6 | 155 | 19.4%* | 6.3%* | 1.04* | 3.97* |