Hyun Jin Ryu
P Toronto Blue Jays| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 34 | MLBTOR | 31 | 31 | 169 | 4.37 | 3.91 | 20.4% | 5.3% | 3.0 | ||
| 2022 | 35 | MIX2 levels | 7 | 7 | 31 | 5.52 | 4.58 | 16.8% | 3.1% | 0.3 | K 14.2% · BB 3.5% · FIP 4.78 | |
| 2023 | 36 | MIX4 levels | 15 | 15 | 70 | 3.09 | 4.43 | 18.7% | 5.2% | 0.8 | K 17.0% · BB 6.2% · FIP 4.66 | |
| 2024 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 26 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 30 | 30 | 192 | 783 | 154 | 45 | 15 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.7% | 5.7% | 13.9% | 1.8% | 3.00 | 3.18 | +5.3 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 30 | 30 | 192 | 783 | 154 | 45 | 15 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.7% | 5.7% | 13.9% | 1.9% | 3.00 | 3.21 | +5.2 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 26 | 26 | 152 | 631 | 139 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.0% | 4.3% | 17.7% | 1.2% | 3.38 | 2.45 | +5.8 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 26 | 26 | 152 | 631 | 139 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.0% | 4.3% | 17.7% | 1.3% | 3.38 | 2.49 | +5.7 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 9 | 9 | 32 | 140 | 27 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 3.6 | 15.2% | 1.6% | 13.6% | 3.5% | 5.29 | 3.95 | +0.6 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 9 | 9 | 32 | 140 | 27 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 3.6 | 19.3% | 1.4% | 17.9% | 3.6% | 5.29 | 3.63 | +0.7 |
| 2017 | 30 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 25 | 24 | 127 | 541 | 116 | 42 | 22 | 96% | 5.1 | 21.4% | 7.8% | 13.7% | 3.9% | 3.77 | 4.41 | +1.5 |
| 2017 | 30 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 25 | 24 | 127 | 541 | 116 | 42 | 22 | 96% | 5.1 | 21.4% | 7.8% | 13.7% | 4.1% | 3.77 | 4.52 | +1.3 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 17 | 91 | 357 | 96 | 14 | 9 | 100% | 5.4 | 27.5% | 4.3% | 23.1% | 2.7% | 1.87 | 2.79 | +3.0 |
| 2018 | 31 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 17 | 17 | 91 | 357 | 96 | 14 | 9 | 100% | 5.4 | 26.9% | 3.9% | 23.0% | 2.5% | 1.87 | 2.74 | +3.1 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 29 | 29 | 183 | 723 | 163 | 22 | 17 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.5% | 3.0% | 19.5% | 2.3% | 2.32 | 2.82 | +6.0 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 29 | 29 | 183 | 723 | 163 | 22 | 17 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.5% | 3.0% | 19.5% | 2.4% | 2.32 | 2.89 | +5.8 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 12 | 12 | 67 | 275 | 72 | 17 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 26.2% | 6.2% | 20.0% | 2.2% | 2.69 | 2.87 | +2.1 |
| 2020 | 33 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 12 | 12 | 67 | 275 | 72 | 17 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 26.2% | 6.2% | 20.0% | 2.2% | 2.69 | 2.88 | +2.1 |
| 2021 | 34 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 31 | 31 | 169 | 701 | 143 | 37 | 24 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.4% | 5.3% | 15.1% | 3.4% | 4.37 | 3.93 | +3.0 |
| 2021 | 34 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 31 | 31 | 169 | 701 | 143 | 37 | 24 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.4% | 5.3% | 15.1% | 3.4% | 4.37 | 3.91 | +3.0 |
| 2022 | 35 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 7 | 31 | 131 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 100% | 4.4 | 14.2% | 3.5% | 10.6% | 4.4% | 5.52 | 4.78 | +0.2 |
| 2022 | 35 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 7 | 31 | 131 | 22 | 4 | 6 | 100% | 4.4 | 16.8% | 3.1% | 13.7% | 4.6% | 5.52 | 4.58 | +0.3 |
| 2023 | 36 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 15 | 15 | 70 | 289 | 54 | 15 | 12 | 100% | 4.7 | 17.0% | 6.2% | 10.7% | 4.0% | 3.09 | 4.66 | +0.6 |
| 2023 | 36 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 15 | 15 | 70 | 289 | 54 | 15 | 12 | 100% | 4.7 | 18.7% | 5.2% | 13.5% | 4.2% | 3.09 | 4.43 | +0.8 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 186 | 185 | 1055 | 4339 | 934 | 223 | 116 | 99% | 5.7 | 21.5% | 5.1% | 16.4% | 2.7% | 3.27 | 3.39 | +26.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 186 | 185 | 1055 | 4339 | 934 | 223 | 116 | 99% | 5.7 | 21.5% | 5.1% | 16.4% | 2.7% | 3.27 | 3.40 | +25.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 35 | 200 | 822 | 177 | 42 | 22 | 99% | 5.7 | 21.5% | 5.1% | 16.4% | 2.7% | 3.27 | 3.40 | +4.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 201 | 200 | 1114 | 4571 | 974 | 230 | 121 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.3% | 5.0% | 16.3% | 2.7% | 3.26 | 3.40 | +26.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 36 | 36 | 200 | 821 | 175 | 41 | 22 | 100% | 5.5 | 21.3% | 5.0% | 16.3% | 2.7% | 3.26 | 3.40 | +4.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 11 IPFIP 5.54 → 6.69 (+1.15)K% 26.3% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.32% | — | ×0.860 | 22.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.63% | — | ×0.900 | 2.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.89% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 9.48% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 5.54 → 6.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 5 IPFIP 1.83 → 1.99 (+0.15)K% 15.0% → 13.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.880 | 13.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.020 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 1.83 → 1.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 18 IPFIP 3.16 → 3.95 (+0.79)K% 19.7% → 15.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.72% | — | ×0.770 | 15.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 1.41% | — | ×1.150 | 1.62% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.82% | ÷1.003 | ×1.250 | 3.51% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 3.16 → 3.95, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAOklahoma City Dodgers · 10 IPFIP 3.85 → 4.45 (+0.60)K% 20.0% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.880 | 17.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.050 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.44% | ÷0.947 | ×1.100 | 5.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 3.85 → 4.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).