Marcus Stroman
P New York Yankees| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 32 | MLBCHC | 27 | 25 | 137 | 3.95 | 3.36 | 20.7% | 9.0% | 3.4 | ||
| 2024 | 33 | MLBNYY | 30 | 29 | 155 | 4.31 | 4.40 | 16.7% | 8.9% | 1.8 | ||
| 2025 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 12 | 12 | 49 | 6.39 | 4.54 | 15.8% | 9.5% | 0.5 | K 14.9% · BB 9.1% · FIP 4.77 | |
| 2026 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 36 | MLBNYY | 7 | 7 | 42 | 4.80 | 4.97 | 15.2% | 9.2% | 0.2 | ||
| 2028PROJ | 37 | MLBNYY | 3 | 3 | 20 | 5.14 | 5.37 | 14.1% | 9.8% | 0.0 | ||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 23 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 26 | 20 | 131 | 534 | 111 | 27 | 7 | 77% | 5.0 | 20.8% | 5.1% | 15.7% | 1.3% | 3.65 | 2.70 | +4.5 |
| 2014 | 23 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 26 | 20 | 131 | 534 | 111 | 27 | 7 | 77% | 5.0 | 20.8% | 5.1% | 15.7% | 1.3% | 3.65 | 2.72 | +4.4 |
| 2015 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 6 | 6 | 35 | 139 | 30 | 11 | 2 | 100% | 5.8 | 17.5% | 5.8% | 11.7% | 1.9% | 2.34 | 3.43 | +0.8 |
| 2015 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 6 | 6 | 35 | 139 | 30 | 11 | 2 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.6% | 7.9% | 13.7% | 1.4% | 2.34 | 3.07 | +1.0 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 32 | 32 | 204 | 855 | 166 | 54 | 21 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.4% | 6.3% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 4.37 | 3.61 | +4.5 |
| 2016 | 25 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 32 | 32 | 204 | 855 | 166 | 54 | 21 | 100% | 6.4 | 19.4% | 6.3% | 13.1% | 2.5% | 4.37 | 3.60 | +4.5 |
| 2017 | 26 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 33 | 33 | 201 | 834 | 164 | 61 | 21 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.7% | 7.3% | 12.4% | 2.5% | 3.09 | 3.75 | +4.0 |
| 2017 | 26 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 33 | 33 | 201 | 834 | 164 | 61 | 21 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.7% | 7.3% | 12.4% | 2.5% | 3.09 | 3.74 | +4.0 |
| 2018 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 107 | 466 | 80 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 5.3 | 17.1% | 8.0% | 9.1% | 2.0% | 5.48 | 3.77 | +2.1 |
| 2018 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 20 | 107 | 466 | 80 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 5.3 | 17.2% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 2.1% | 5.48 | 3.94 | +1.9 |
| 2019 | 28 | MLB MLE | New York Mets | 32 | 32 | 184 | 774 | 159 | 57 | 18 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.5% | 7.4% | 13.2% | 2.3% | 3.22 | 3.58 | +4.1 |
| 2019 | 28 | MLB RAW | New York Mets | 32 | 32 | 184 | 774 | 159 | 57 | 18 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.5% | 7.4% | 13.2% | 2.3% | 3.22 | 3.57 | +4.1 |
| 2021 | 30 | MLB MLE | New York Mets | 33 | 33 | 179 | 730 | 158 | 42 | 17 | 100% | 5.4 | 21.6% | 5.8% | 15.9% | 2.3% | 3.02 | 3.28 | +4.7 |
| 2021 | 30 | MLB RAW | New York Mets | 33 | 33 | 179 | 730 | 158 | 42 | 17 | 100% | 5.4 | 21.6% | 5.8% | 15.9% | 2.3% | 3.02 | 3.27 | +4.7 |
| 2022 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 141 | 585 | 121 | 37 | 16 | 100% | 5.4 | 20.9% | 6.3% | 14.6% | 2.9% | 3.76 | 3.74 | +2.8 |
| 2022 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 26 | 141 | 585 | 121 | 37 | 16 | 100% | 5.4 | 20.7% | 6.3% | 14.4% | 2.7% | 3.76 | 3.64 | +3.0 |
| 2023 | 32 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 27 | 25 | 137 | 575 | 119 | 52 | 9 | 93% | 5.1 | 20.7% | 9.0% | 11.7% | 1.6% | 3.95 | 3.39 | +3.4 |
| 2023 | 32 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 27 | 25 | 137 | 575 | 119 | 52 | 9 | 93% | 5.1 | 20.7% | 9.0% | 11.7% | 1.6% | 3.95 | 3.36 | +3.4 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB MLE | New York Yankees | 30 | 29 | 155 | 675 | 113 | 60 | 19 | 97% | 5.2 | 16.7% | 8.9% | 7.9% | 2.6% | 4.31 | 4.26 | +2.1 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB MLE | New York Yankees | 30 | 29 | 155 | 675 | 113 | 60 | 19 | 97% | 5.2 | 16.7% | 8.9% | 7.9% | 2.6% | 4.31 | 4.26 | +2.1 |
| 2024 | 33 | MLB RAW | New York Yankees | 30 | 29 | 155 | 675 | 113 | 60 | 19 | 97% | 5.2 | 16.7% | 8.9% | 7.9% | 2.8% | 4.31 | 4.40 | +1.8 |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 49 | 221 | 35 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 4.1 | 14.9% | 9.1% | 5.7% | 3.2% | 6.39 | 4.77 | +0.4 |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 49 | 221 | 35 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 4.1 | 14.9% | 9.1% | 5.7% | 3.2% | 6.39 | 4.77 | +0.4 |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 49 | 221 | 35 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 4.1 | 15.8% | 9.5% | 6.3% | 2.7% | 6.39 | 4.54 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 270 | 261 | 1497 | 6273 | 1230 | 447 | 145 | 97% | 5.5 | 19.6% | 7.1% | 12.5% | 2.3% | 3.79 | 3.61 | +32.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 36 | MLB | NYY | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 27 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 15.2% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 2.9% | 4.80 | 4.97 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 37 | MLB MLE | NYY | 3 | 3 | 20 | 86 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.8 | 14.1% | 9.8% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 5.14 | 5.37 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 37 | MLB CTX | NYY | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 14.1% | 9.8% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 5.14 | 5.37 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 273 | 264 | 1518 | 6359 | 1242 | 455 | 148 | 97% | 5.6 | 19.5% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 3.80 | 3.63 | +32.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 35 | 200 | 838 | 164 | 60 | 20 | 97% | 5.6 | 19.5% | 7.2% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 3.80 | 3.63 | +4.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 277 | 268 | 1522 | 6388 | 1249 | 456 | 147 | 97% | 5.5 | 19.6% | 7.1% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 3.84 | 3.62 | +32.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 36 | 35 | 200 | 839 | 164 | 60 | 19 | 97% | 5.5 | 19.6% | 7.1% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 3.84 | 3.62 | +4.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AASomerset Patriots · 10 IPFIP 2.82 → 3.28 (+0.45)K% 19.6% → 15.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.57% | — | ×0.810 | 15.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.87% | — | ×1.100 | 11.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.030 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 2.82 → 3.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAABuffalo Bisons · 3 IPFIP 3.52 → 3.90 (+0.38)K% 25.0% → 22.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.880 | 22.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.00% | — | ×1.050 | 21.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.966 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 3.52 → 3.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 7.8 | 120 | 19.4% | 7.3% | 0.91 | 3.83 |
| Alex Wood ('24) | 6.3 | 114 | 22.1% | 7.1% | 0.91 | 3.78 |
| Jaime García ('18) | 5.7 | 126 | 19.2% | 7.7% | 0.87 | 3.85 |
| Bob Moose ('67-'76, 14 WAR*) | 6.5 | 145 | 20.0%* | 7.0%* | 0.80* | 4.31* |
| Roger Nelson ('67-'76, 10 WAR*) | 3.2 | 106 | 19.5%* | 7.1%* | 0.98* | 3.88* |
| Bryn Smith ('81-'93, 21 WAR*) | 9.0 | 149 | 17.9%* | 5.8%* | 1.07* | 4.08* |
| Danny Duffy ('21) | 5.9 | 107 | 21.1% | 8.7% | 1.11 | 3.95 |