Jose Monzon
3B Charleston RiverDogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | ROKTB | 225 | .253/.369/.332 | 1 | 11 | 37 | — | .177/.258/.232 |
| 2025 | 19 | ATB | 349 | .209/.307/.255 | 1 | 8 | 37 | — | .187/.258/.232 |
| 2026 | 20 | A/ROKTB | 156 | .208/.327/.254 | 0 | 13 | 31 | — | .169/.261/.199 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBTB | 296 | .190/.266/.239 | 1 | 6 | 46 | -0.3 | |
| 2028PROJ34% MLB | 22 | MLBTB | 51 | .199/.276/.264 | 0 | 1 | 54 | -0.1 |
Tools · ContractCON 30 / POW 20
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK | DSL Rays | — | 205 | 164 | 46 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 35 | 30 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 280 | 407 | 421 | 828 | 140 | 304 | 15 | 17 | 365 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 190 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 38 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 253 | 369 | 332 | 700 | 79 | 311 | 17 | 15 | 327 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 302 | 63 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 78 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 209 | 307 | 255 | 562 | 46 | 274 | 22 | 12 | 265 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 96 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 26 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 208 | 339 | 250 | 589 | 42 | 286 | 22 | 15 | 281 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK | FCL Rays | — | 39 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 206 | 289 | 265 | 554 | 59 | 259 | 21 | 8 | 254 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 205 | 174 | 33 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 37 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 190 | 291 | 276 | 567 | 86 | 200 | 18 | 12 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 203 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 177 | 258 | 232 | 489 | 54 | 239 | 25 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 315 | 59 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 105 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 232 | 490 | 44 | 267 | 30 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 117 | 101 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 178 | 278 | 208 | 486 | 30 | 262 | 30 | 11 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 39 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 143 | 211 | 171 | 382 | 29 | 202 | 31 | 5 | 181 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 205 | 174 | 33 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 37 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 190 | 291 | 276 | 567 | 86 | 214 | 18 | 12 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | — | 205 | 164 | 46 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 35 | 30 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 280 | 407 | 421 | 828 | 140 | 304 | 15 | 17 | 365 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 203 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 177 | 258 | 232 | 489 | 54 | 240 | 25 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 190 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 38 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 253 | 369 | 332 | 700 | 79 | 311 | 17 | 15 | 327 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 315 | 59 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 105 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 232 | 490 | 44 | 274 | 30 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 302 | 63 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 78 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 209 | 307 | 255 | 562 | 46 | 274 | 22 | 12 | 265 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 156 | 137 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 47 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 168 | 255 | 204 | 459 | 36 | 253 | 30 | 9 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 156 | 130 | 27 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 34 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 208 | 327 | 254 | 581 | 46 | 278 | 22 | 13 | 275 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | — | 205 | 178 | 33 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 37 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 185 | 291 | 270 | 561 | 84 | 200 | 18 | 12 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 201 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 179 | 258 | 234 | 492 | 55 | 239 | 25 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 316 | 59 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 105 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 231 | 489 | 44 | 267 | 30 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 156 | 139 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 47 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 165 | 255 | 201 | 456 | 36 | 247 | 30 | 9 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 18 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | — | 225 | 201 | 36 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 179 | 258 | 234 | 492 | 55 | 239 | 25 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 349 | 316 | 59 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 105 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 187 | 258 | 231 | 489 | 44 | 267 | 30 | 9 | 223 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 156 | 139 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 47 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 165 | 255 | 201 | 456 | 36 | 247 | 30 | 9 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | TB | 0% | 296 | 267 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 77 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 190 | 266 | 239 | 505 | 49 | 261 | 26 | 9 | 236 | 46 | -19 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +6 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | TB | 34% | 149 | 134 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 38 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 197 | 274 | 263 | 536 | 66 | 264 | 26 | 9 | 249 | 54 | -8 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +3 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | TB | 34% | 51 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 199 | 276 | 264 | 539 | 65 | 267 | 25 | 10 | 250 | 54 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 51 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 196 | 275 | 239 | 514 | 43 | 273 | 25 | 10 | 250 | 43 | -3 | +0 | +0 | +0 | +1 | -0.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 586 | 114 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 166 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 195 | 274 | 237 | 511 | 43 | 271 | 26 | 10 | 250 | 43 | -35 | +3 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -1.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1186 | 1055 | 194 | 34 | 2 | 6 | 112 | 309 | 4 | 43 | 18 | 184 | 265 | 237 | 502 | 53 | 250 | 26 | 9 | 231 | 43 | -15 | +0 | +0 | +1 | +5 | -0.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 578 | 106 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 61 | 169 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 183 | 264 | 235 | 499 | 52 | 249 | 26 | 9 | 231 | 43 | -38 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ACharleston RiverDogs · 117 PAwOBA .275 → .224 (−51)K% 22.2% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.22% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 30.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 10.77% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.68% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 21.36% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 4.82% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×1.001 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.
Result: wOBA .275 → .224; ISO .042 → .034; BABIP .286 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Rays · 39 PAwOBA .255 → .181 (−74)K% 20.5% → 29.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.51% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 29.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 4.70% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.56% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 1.82% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 15.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 5.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .255 → .181; ISO .059 → .040; BABIP .259 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACharleston RiverDogs · 349 PAwOBA .260 → .223 (−37)K% 22.3% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.35% | ÷1.006 | ×1.360 | — | — | 30.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.03% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 8.69% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.77% | ÷1.013 | ×0.920 | ×1.029 | ×1.030 | 21.91% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.91% | ÷0.850 | ×0.830 | ×1.029 | ×1.030 | 5.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | ×1.029 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.45% | ÷1.159 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.32% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 103, 2B 70, 3B 124, K 101, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.029.
Result: wOBA .260 → .223; ISO .046 → .043; BABIP .274 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Rays · 225 PAwOBA .319 → .223 (−96)K% 16.9% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.89% | ÷0.980 | ×1.440 | — | — | 24.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.11% | ÷1.024 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 9.21% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.44% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 0.32% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.34% | ÷1.024 | ×0.820 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 19.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.941 | ×0.720 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 3.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.32% | ÷1.150 | ×0.720 | ×0.969 | ×1.008 | 0.80% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.66% | ÷1.002 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.52% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 105, 2B 88, 3B 130, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.969.
Result: wOBA .319 → .223; ISO .079 → .055; BABIP .311 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 DSLDSL Rays · 205 PAwOBA .367 → .253 (−115)K% 14.6% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.63% | ÷0.987 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.07% | ÷0.984 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 12.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.37% | ÷1.005 | ×0.680 | ×1.000 | ×1.008 | 17.29% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.48% | ÷0.993 | ×0.600 | ×1.000 | ×1.008 | 2.72% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.75% | ÷1.035 | ×0.600 | ×1.000 | ×1.008 | 0.44% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.73% | ÷0.938 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 1.88% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 101, 2B 99, 3B 107, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .367 → .253; ISO .140 → .081; BABIP .304 → .200. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).