Scott Randall

P Greensboro Grasshoppers

Age 28 RHP 6'0" / 172 lbs A+ peak 0.4 · 2027

Overview

A+PROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2021	22	AARI	5	2	19	0.47	1.31	32.9%	5.7%	—	K 24.3% · BB 6.7% · FIP 1.90
2022	23	A+ARI	21	21	108	3.82	3.55	23.4%	5.6%	—	K 18.0% · BB 6.5% · FIP 4.94
2024	25	MIX4 levels	19	8	53	4.39	2.18	24.3%	2.8%	—	K 18.1% · BB 2.8% · FIP 3.08
2027PROJ	28	MLBPIT	4	4	23	4.12	4.12	22.1%	6.9%	0.2
2028PROJ30% MLB	29	MLBPIT	1	1	7	4.22	4.27	22.0%	7.4%	0.1

Next 2 projected WAR 0.3Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsErik Hiljus (age 28) · Fabio Castillo (age 28) · Raynel Espinal (age 27)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 111103vR 95

ERA4.12

FIP4.12

K%22.1%

BB%6.9%

K-BB%15.2%

Proj IP23

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 23 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	22	A MLE	Visalia Rawhide	5	2	19	70	23	4	0	40%	3.8	24.3%	6.7%	17.6%	0.0%	0.47	1.90	—
2021	22	A RAW	Visalia Rawhide	5	2	19	70	23	4	0	40%	3.8	32.9%	5.7%	27.1%	0.0%	0.47	1.31	—
2022	23	A+ MLE	Hillsboro Hops	21	21	108	445	104	25	14	100%	5.2	18.0%	6.5%	11.5%	4.6%	3.82	4.94	—
2022	23	A+ RAW	Hillsboro Hops	21	21	108	445	104	25	14	100%	5.2	23.4%	5.6%	17.8%	3.1%	3.82	3.55	—
2024	25	MIX MLE	4 levels	19	8	53	218	53	6	3	42%	2.8	18.1%	2.8%	15.2%	2.1%	4.39	3.08	—
2024	25	MIX MLE	4 levels	19	8	53	218	53	6	3	42%	2.8	18.1%	2.8%	15.2%	2.1%	4.39	3.08	—
2024	25	MIX RAW	4 levels	19	8	53	218	53	6	3	42%	2.8	24.3%	2.8%	21.6%	1.4%	4.39	2.18	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	28	MLB	PIT	4	4	23	97	21	7	3	100%	5.8	22.1%	6.9%	15.2%	3.0%	4.12	4.12	+0.2
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	29	MLB MLE	PIT	4	4	22	91	20	7	3	100%	5.4	22.0%	7.4%	14.6%	3.1%	4.22	4.27	+0.2
2028	29	MLB CTX	PIT	1	1	7	30	6	2	1	100%	7.0	22.0%	7.4%	14.6%	3.1%	4.22	4.27	+0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		1	1	7	28	6	2	1	100%	6.5	22.0%	7.4%	14.6%	3.1%	4.22	3.90	+0.1
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		33	33	200	844	184	61	31	100%	6.0	22.0%	7.4%	14.6%	3.1%	4.22	3.90	+2.4
Career	—	MLE		45	31	181	733	136	40	25	69%	4.0	18.6%	5.4%	13.2%	3.4%	3.64	4.10	+0.2
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		50	34	200	811	151	44	28	69%	4.0	18.6%	5.4%	13.2%	3.4%	3.64	4.10	+1.5

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Scott Randall (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.12	22.1%	6.9%	3.0%	—	4.27	22.0%	14.6%	22	+0.15	—	—	—
Erik Hiljus R 2001 · 3.35 FIP	28	SP-	3.35	23.1%	6.9%	2.4%	.321	6.07	14.1%	4.4%	46	+2.72	3.35	112	84
Fabio Castillo R 2017 · 3.98 FIP	28	SP-	3.98	20.9%	8.8%	2.8%	.291	—	—	—	—	—	3.13	195	75
Raynel Espinal R 2019 · 3.90 FIP	27	SP-	3.90	22.4%	7.1%	3.2%	.313	4.01	22.3%	12.4%	224	+0.11	2.48	507	73
Jose Contreras R 2003 · 3.03 FIP	31	SP-	3.03	24.6%	9.9%	1.4%	.255	4.30	17.9%	9.5%	571	+1.27	2.43	1,279	71
Todd Redmond R 2013 · 4.14 FIP	28	SP-	4.14	23.5%	6.5%	4.0%	.266	3.57	17.0%	10.1%	170	-0.57	3.21	247	71
Ryan Watson R 2024 · 4.15 FIP	25	SP-	4.15	18.6%	4.9%	3.7%	.342	5.48	13.1%	5.4%	98	+1.33	4.15	165	70
Omar Bencomo R 2017 · 4.50 FIP	28	SP-	4.50	18.9%	6.3%	4.0%	.333	4.48	14.9%	10.1%	186	-0.02	3.70	381	70
Kyle Snyder R 2006 · 4.47 FIP	28	SP-	4.47	19.9%	5.9%	4.2%	.373	4.83	16.9%	4.5%	54	+0.36	3.80	236	68
Ramon Ramirez R 2008 · 4.31 FIP	25	SP-	4.31	20.0%	10.5%	2.9%	.200	—	—	—	—	—	3.65	182	67
Zach Stewart R 2015 · 4.43 FIP	28	SP-	4.43	14.4%	8.3%	2.7%	.322	5.17	11.7%	2.1%	51	+0.74	4.27	194	66
Jake Walkinshaw R 2024 · 4.03 FIP	28	SP	4.03	16.1%	8.5%	2.2%	.244	3.83	15.7%	5.7%	92	-0.20	2.84	310	66
Jorge Reyes R 2016 · 3.39 FIP	28	SP-	3.39	14.9%	6.9%	1.2%	.357	4.81	11.8%	3.0%	75	+1.42	3.39	227	65
Markus Solbach R 2019 · 3.58 FIP	27	SP	3.58	16.9%	6.1%	2.1%	.311	4.62	17.1%	9.1%	111	+1.04	3.34	391	65
Sam Lewis R 2019 · 3.41 FIP	27	SP-	3.41	21.0%	10.8%	1.3%	.246	—	—	—	—	—	2.21	224	65
Ariel Peña R 2017 · 3.99 FIP	28	SP	3.99	22.5%	12.0%	2.3%	.304	6.07	19.9%	-5.7%	21	+2.08	3.74	223	65
Dustin Nippert R 2009 · 4.09 FIP	28	SP-	4.09	18.0%	9.7%	2.3%	.271	4.49	17.9%	6.1%	57	+0.40	3.83	268	64
Tiago Da Silva R 2015 · 3.10 FIP	30	SW	3.10	19.6%	4.5%	2.0%	.278	2.38	21.4%	18.5%	98	-0.72	2.21	287	64
Jonathan Pintaro R 2024 · 3.42 FIP	26	SP	3.42	18.9%	9.4%	1.3%	.264	4.07	23.9%	12.1%	153	+0.65	3.42	223	64
Jorge Martinez R 2016 · 3.53 FIP	31	SP-	3.53	12.9%	5.3%	1.6%	.266	3.71	16.5%	11.5%	154	+0.18	3.53	214	64
Braydon Tucker R 2024 · 3.25 FIP	25	SP-	3.25	18.3%	7.1%	1.5%	.291	4.70	15.3%	6.3%	208	+1.45	3.25	314	64