Patrick Wicklander
P Montgomery Biscuits| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 15 | 98 | 4.78 | 3.66 | 28.3% | 6.8% | — | K 21.5% · BB 7.9% · FIP 4.88 | |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 30 | 18 | 111 | 3.90 | 4.28 | 21.2% | 7.9% | — | K 16.9% · BB 8.8% · FIP 4.95 | |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 0 | 48 | 5.40 | 4.92 | 17.4% | 15.1% | — | K 15.1% · BB 15.0% · FIP 5.11 | |
| 2025 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBTB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 20.3% | 11.6% | -0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBTB | 8 | 0 | 8 | 4.86 | 4.90 | 20.5% | 11.5% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 5 | 0 | 11 | 44 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 2.3 | 50.0% | 6.8% | 43.2% | 0.0% | 0.00 | -0.26 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 5 | 0 | 11 | 44 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 2.3 | 50.0% | 6.8% | 43.2% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.01 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 15 | 98 | 424 | 120 | 29 | 16 | 60% | 3.9 | 21.5% | 7.9% | 13.6% | 4.7% | 4.78 | 4.88 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 15 | 98 | 424 | 120 | 29 | 16 | 60% | 3.9 | 28.3% | 6.8% | 21.5% | 3.8% | 4.78 | 3.66 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 18 | 111 | 481 | 102 | 38 | 17 | 60% | 3.7 | 16.9% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 3.9% | 3.90 | 4.95 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 18 | 111 | 481 | 102 | 38 | 17 | 60% | 3.7 | 21.2% | 7.9% | 13.3% | 3.5% | 3.90 | 4.28 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 48 | 219 | 38 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 1.9 | 15.1% | 15.0% | 0.1% | 2.5% | 5.40 | 5.11 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 48 | 219 | 38 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 1.9 | 15.1% | 15.0% | 0.1% | 2.5% | 5.40 | 5.11 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 48 | 219 | 38 | 33 | 5 | 0% | 1.9 | 17.4% | 15.1% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 5.40 | 4.92 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | TB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.3% | 11.6% | 8.8% | 3.0% | 4.87 | 4.87 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | TB | 20 | 0 | 21 | 89 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 11.5% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.86 | 4.90 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | TB | 8 | 0 | 8 | 34 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.5% | 11.5% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.86 | 4.90 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 8 | 0 | 8 | 33 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.5% | 11.5% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.86 | 4.52 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 177 | 101 | 25 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 11.5% | 9.0% | 3.1% | 4.86 | 4.52 | +0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 85 | 33 | 268 | 1168 | 227 | 112 | 45 | 39% | 3.2 | 19.5% | 9.6% | 9.9% | 3.8% | 4.33 | 4.76 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 63 | 25 | 200 | 871 | 170 | 83 | 33 | 39% | 3.2 | 19.5% | 9.6% | 9.9% | 3.8% | 4.33 | 4.76 | -0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 45 IPFIP 4.36 → 5.11 (+0.75)K% 18.7% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.69% | — | ×0.810 | 15.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.64% | — | ×1.100 | 15.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.02% | ÷0.958 | ×1.200 | 2.53% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 4.36 → 5.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAADurham Bulls · 3 IPFIP 8.93 → 8.72 (−0.21)K% 4.8% → 4.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 4.76% | — | ×0.860 | 4.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.900 | 25.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.76% | ÷1.061 | ×1.100 | 4.94% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 8.93 → 8.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 82 IPFIP 4.57 → 5.20 (+0.63)K% 19.3% → 15.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.27% | — | ×0.810 | 15.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.54% | — | ×1.100 | 8.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.91% | ÷1.087 | ×1.200 | 4.32% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 4.57 → 5.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 29 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.23 (+0.92)K% 26.8% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.83% | — | ×0.770 | 20.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.94% | — | ×1.150 | 10.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.44% | ÷1.066 | ×1.250 | 2.86% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Bowling Green Hot Rods · 71 IPFIP 4.37 → 5.51 (+1.13)K% 24.0% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.04% | — | ×0.770 | 18.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.01% | — | ×1.150 | 9.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.17% | ÷1.020 | ×1.250 | 5.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 5.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ACharleston RiverDogs · 27 IPFIP 1.63 → 3.15 (+1.52)K% 40.2% → 29.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.18% | — | ×0.740 | 29.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.57% | — | ×1.180 | 4.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.68% | ÷0.943 | ×1.300 | 3.69% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 1.63 → 3.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKFCL Rays · 11 IPFIP -0.26 → 1.31 (+1.57)K% 50.0% → 34.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 50.00% | — | ×0.680 | 34.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.82% | — | ×1.250 | 8.52% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.948 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP -0.26 → 1.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).