Matt Givin

P Tampa Tarpons

Age 28 RHP 6'3" / 180 lbs A

Overview

APROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2022	23	A+MIA	28	1	52	5.05	2.29	23.5%	3.2%	—	K 18.1% · BB 3.7% · FIP 3.11
2023	24	A+MIA	26	0	40	3.63	3.02	20.2%	7.7%	—	K 15.6% · BB 8.9% · FIP 3.91
2024	25	MIX3 levels	13	0	21	5.66	3.58	20.8%	8.3%	—	K 12.7% · BB 8.4% · FIP 5.18
2027PROJ	28	MLBNYY	9	0	9	4.38	4.38	22.5%	9.0%	0.0
2028PROJ30% MLB	29	MLBNYY	6	0	6	4.45	4.50	22.3%	9.3%	0.0

Next 2 projected WAR 0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsColeman Huntley III (age 28) · Nelson Gonzalez (age 28) · Edwin Quirarte (age 28)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 116108vR 100

ERA4.38

FIP4.38

K%22.5%

BB%9.0%

K-BB%13.4%

Proj IP9

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 9 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2017	18	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	7	7	23	87	19	6	0	100%	3.3	14.9%	8.6%	6.2%	0.0%	0.39	2.94	—
2017	18	ROK RAW	GCL Marlins	7	7	23	87	19	6	0	100%	3.3	21.8%	6.9%	14.9%	0.0%	0.39	2.24	—
2019	20	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	10	5	46	188	35	15	2	50%	4.6	12.7%	10.0%	2.7%	1.5%	2.74	4.11	—
2019	20	ROK RAW	GCL Marlins	10	5	46	188	35	15	2	50%	4.6	18.6%	8.0%	10.6%	1.1%	2.74	3.12	—
2021	22	A MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	19	14	90	393	74	37	8	74%	4.7	13.9%	11.1%	2.8%	3.0%	3.80	4.96	—
2021	22	A RAW	Jupiter Hammerheads	19	14	90	393	74	37	8	74%	4.7	18.8%	9.4%	9.4%	2.0%	3.80	3.84	—
2022	23	A+ MLE	Beloit Sky Carp	28	1	52	217	51	7	3	4%	1.8	18.1%	3.7%	14.4%	2.0%	5.05	3.11	—
2022	23	A+ RAW	Beloit Sky Carp	28	1	52	217	51	7	3	4%	1.8	23.5%	3.2%	20.3%	1.4%	5.05	2.29	—
2023	24	A+ MLE	Beloit Sky Carp	26	0	40	168	34	13	2	0%	1.5	15.6%	8.9%	6.7%	1.8%	3.63	3.91	—
2023	24	A+ RAW	Beloit Sky Carp	26	0	40	168	34	13	2	0%	1.5	20.2%	7.7%	12.5%	1.2%	3.63	3.02	—
2024	25	MIX MLE	3 levels	13	0	21	96	20	8	2	0%	1.6	12.7%	8.4%	4.3%	3.8%	5.66	5.18	—
2024	25	MIX MLE	3 levels	13	0	21	96	20	8	2	0%	1.6	12.7%	8.4%	4.3%	3.8%	5.66	5.18	—
2024	25	MIX RAW	3 levels	13	0	21	96	20	8	2	0%	1.6	20.8%	8.3%	12.5%	2.1%	5.66	3.58	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	28	MLB	NYY	9	0	9	38	9	3	1	0%	1.0	22.5%	9.0%	13.4%	3.0%	4.38	4.38	+0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	29	MLB MLE	NYY	19	0	20	84	19	8	3	0%	1.1	22.3%	9.3%	13.1%	3.2%	4.45	4.50	+0.0
2028	29	MLB CTX	NYY	6	0	6	25	6	2	1	0%	1.0	22.3%	9.3%	13.1%	3.2%	4.45	4.50	+0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	25	6	2	1	0%	1.0	22.3%	9.3%	13.0%	3.2%	4.45	4.12	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	201	67	33	0%	1.1	22.3%	9.3%	13.0%	3.2%	4.45	4.12	+1.0
Career	—	MLE		103	27	271	1149	169	101	25	26%	2.6	14.7%	8.8%	5.9%	2.2%	3.68	4.18	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		76	20	200	847	125	74	19	26%	2.6	14.7%	8.8%	5.9%	2.2%	3.68	4.18	+0.1

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Matt Givin (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.38	22.5%	9.0%	3.0%	—	4.50	22.3%	13.1%	20	+0.12	—	—	—
Coleman Huntley III R 2021 · 3.85 FIP	28	SW	3.85	20.2%	7.4%	2.8%	.348	3.56	23.4%	13.2%	86	-0.29	2.38	160	75
Nelson Gonzalez R 2018 · 5.03 FIP	28	SW	5.03	19.2%	8.2%	4.6%	.311	6.22	16.9%	4.6%	74	+1.19	3.42	258	74
Edwin Quirarte R 2015 · 3.41 FIP	28	SW	3.41	16.7%	6.2%	1.7%	.311	3.48	12.7%	4.9%	83	+0.06	3.16	157	74
Connor Schultz R 2024 · 3.88 FIP	25	SU	3.88	19.7%	5.3%	3.2%	.283	4.02	18.8%	10.4%	156	+0.14	3.53	203	73
Carlos Torres R 2010 · 4.50 FIP	27	SW	4.50	18.3%	11.3%	2.8%	.438	3.89	20.1%	13.2%	139	-0.61	2.89	604	72
Luis Santos R 2019 · 4.31 FIP	28	SU	4.31	22.9%	10.0%	3.4%	.312	—	—	—	—	—	3.53	472	71
Andrew Robinson R 2016 · 3.19 FIP	28	SU	3.19	22.2%	7.9%	1.8%	.247	4.32	23.4%	14.6%	39	+1.13	3.19	160	70
Matt Ramsey R 2018 · 3.78 FIP	28	SU	3.78	24.9%	8.8%	3.0%	.276	2.42	21.7%	12.6%	34	-1.36	2.42	125	70
Mayckol Guaipe R 2019 · 4.18 FIP	28	SW	4.18	26.0%	7.6%	4.2%	.432	—	—	—	—	—	1.88	136	69
Reinier Roibal R 2016 · 4.37 FIP	27	SW	4.37	16.9%	7.1%	3.3%	.371	4.91	17.5%	5.7%	37	+0.54	3.11	133	69
Daniel Robert R 2023 · 3.45 FIP	28	SU	3.45	22.7%	10.7%	1.7%	.310	3.02	25.4%	17.1%	87	-0.43	2.32	186	69
Cody Poteet R 2022 · 4.79 FIP	28	SW	4.79	18.4%	9.6%	3.7%	.244	3.73	21.1%	13.3%	68	-1.06	3.52	619	69
Emmanuel Chapman R 2024 · 4.08 FIP	25	SW	4.08	19.7%	10.6%	2.4%	.256	4.52	17.8%	1.3%	117	+0.44	3.81	198	68
Sam Lewis R 2019 · 3.41 FIP	27	SP-	3.41	21.0%	10.8%	1.3%	.246	—	—	—	—	—	2.21	224	68
Alfonso Sanchez R 2016 · 5.26 FIP	28	SW	5.26	15.9%	7.4%	4.7%	.244	5.55	11.2%	2.3%	115	+0.29	4.51	224	68
Luis Mateo R 2017 · 4.60 FIP	27	SU	4.60	17.6%	11.2%	2.9%	.309	5.55	8.6%	-4.8%	43	+0.95	3.48	160	68
Yoanner Negrin R 2015 · 3.79 FIP	31	SW	3.79	15.1%	7.5%	1.9%	.256	3.29	15.0%	8.5%	270	-0.50	3.15	485	68
Gus Schlosser R 2016 · 3.92 FIP	27	SU	3.92	18.7%	5.6%	3.1%	.364	—	—	—	—	—	3.92	107	68
Lou Pote R 2000 · 3.34 FIP	28	SU	3.34	20.6%	7.5%	1.9%	.320	4.49	16.7%	7.9%	137	+1.15	3.31	217	67
Tyler Sturdevant R 2015 · 4.37 FIP	29	SU	4.37	21.3%	8.5%	3.6%	.241	3.97	18.5%	11.9%	118	-0.40	3.44	149	67