Michael Plassmeyer
P Tacoma Rainiers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28 | AAATEX | 28 | 16 | 106 | 4.43 | 4.25 | 21.9% | 7.3% | — | K 18.8% · BB 6.6% · FIP 4.83 |
| 2026 | 29 | AAASEA | 27 | 5 | 40 | 4.69 | 4.64 | 21.7% | 11.4% | — | K 18.7% · BB 10.3% · FIP 4.90 |
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBSEA | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 18.8% | 7.5% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 31 | MLBSEA | 3 | 3 | 19 | 4.88 | 4.96 | 18.9% | 8.1% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ55% MLB | 32 | MLBSEA | 4 | 4 | 25 | 5.01 | 5.14 | 18.8% | 8.6% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 25 | 23 | 132 | 515 | 109 | 22 | 8 | 92% | 5.3 | 16.1% | 5.0% | 11.1% | 1.9% | 1.91 | 3.42 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 25 | 23 | 132 | 515 | 109 | 22 | 8 | 92% | 5.3 | 21.2% | 4.3% | 16.9% | 1.6% | 1.91 | 2.74 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA MLE | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 23 | 19 | 109 | 468 | 124 | 23 | 15 | 83% | 4.8 | 21.5% | 5.4% | 16.1% | 4.2% | 4.69 | 4.26 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA RAW | Richmond Flying Squirrels | 23 | 19 | 109 | 468 | 124 | 23 | 15 | 83% | 4.8 | 26.5% | 4.9% | 21.6% | 3.2% | 4.69 | 3.25 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 26 | 136 | 571 | 136 | 48 | 28 | 90% | 4.7 | 20.9% | 9.1% | 11.8% | 5.3% | 4.18 | 5.38 | +0.0 |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 26 | 136 | 571 | 136 | 48 | 28 | 90% | 4.7 | 23.8% | 8.4% | 15.4% | 4.9% | 4.18 | 4.84 | +0.9 |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 18 | 79 | 350 | 87 | 31 | 14 | 90% | 4.0 | 21.3% | 9.0% | 12.3% | 3.6% | 5.45 | 4.41 | +0.9 |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 18 | 79 | 350 | 87 | 31 | 14 | 90% | 4.0 | 24.9% | 8.9% | 16.0% | 4.0% | 5.45 | 4.37 | +1.0 |
| 2024 | 27 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 28 | 11 | 70 | 322 | 86 | 13 | 11 | 39% | 2.5 | 23.0% | 3.6% | 19.3% | 4.1% | 7.93 | 3.89 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | AAA MLE | Indianapolis Indians | 28 | 11 | 70 | 322 | 86 | 13 | 11 | 39% | 2.5 | 23.0% | 3.6% | 19.3% | 4.1% | 7.93 | 3.89 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | AAA RAW | Indianapolis Indians | 28 | 11 | 70 | 322 | 86 | 13 | 11 | 39% | 2.5 | 26.7% | 4.0% | 22.7% | 3.4% | 7.93 | 3.24 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 28 | 16 | 106 | 452 | 99 | 33 | 17 | 57% | 3.8 | 18.8% | 6.6% | 12.3% | 4.5% | 4.43 | 4.83 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 28 | 16 | 106 | 452 | 99 | 33 | 17 | 57% | 3.8 | 18.8% | 6.6% | 12.3% | 4.5% | 4.43 | 4.83 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AAA RAW | Round Rock Express | 28 | 16 | 106 | 452 | 99 | 33 | 17 | 57% | 3.8 | 21.9% | 7.3% | 14.6% | 3.8% | 4.43 | 4.25 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | AAA MLE | Tacoma Rainiers | 27 | 5 | 40 | 175 | 38 | 20 | 6 | 19% | 1.5 | 18.7% | 10.3% | 8.4% | 3.8% | 4.69 | 4.90 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | AAA MLE | Tacoma Rainiers | 27 | 5 | 40 | 175 | 38 | 20 | 6 | 19% | 1.5 | 18.7% | 10.3% | 8.4% | 3.8% | 4.69 | 4.90 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | AAA RAW | Tacoma Rainiers | 27 | 5 | 40 | 175 | 38 | 20 | 6 | 19% | 1.5 | 21.7% | 11.4% | 10.3% | 3.4% | 4.69 | 4.64 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 3 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 33% | 3.7 | 21.2% | 1.9% | 19.2% | 7.7% | 9.82 | 6.10 | -0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | SEA | 1 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 100% | 6.0 | 18.8% | 7.5% | 11.3% | 3.6% | 4.80 | 4.80 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | SEA | 9 | 9 | 53 | 223 | 42 | 18 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.9% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 3.7% | 4.88 | 4.96 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB MLE | SEA | 8 | 8 | 46 | 194 | 36 | 17 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 18.8% | 8.6% | 10.2% | 3.9% | 5.01 | 5.14 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | SEA | 3 | 3 | 19 | 80 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.9% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 3.7% | 4.88 | 4.96 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB CTX | SEA | 4 | 4 | 25 | 106 | 20 | 9 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 18.8% | 8.6% | 10.2% | 3.9% | 5.01 | 5.14 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 10 | 8 | 56 | 241 | 46 | 17 | 11 | 80% | 5.6 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.4% | 4.7% | 5.91 | 4.92 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 38 | 30 | 200 | 864 | 165 | 61 | 39 | 81% | 5.3 | 19.3% | 7.0% | 12.4% | 4.7% | 5.91 | 4.92 | +1.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 180 | 118 | 673 | 2853 | 569 | 194 | 112 | 66% | 3.7 | 19.9% | 6.8% | 13.1% | 3.9% | 4.43 | 4.44 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 35 | 200 | 848 | 169 | 58 | 33 | 66% | 3.7 | 19.9% | 6.8% | 13.1% | 3.9% | 4.43 | 4.44 | +0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAATacoma Rainiers · 40 IPFIP 4.60 → 4.90 (+0.30)K% 21.7% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.71% | — | ×0.860 | 18.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.43% | — | ×0.900 | 10.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.43% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 3.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.60 → 4.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAARound Rock Express · 106 IPFIP 4.24 → 4.83 (+0.59)K% 21.9% → 18.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.90% | — | ×0.860 | 18.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.30% | — | ×0.900 | 6.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.76% | ÷0.913 | ×1.100 | 4.53% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 4.24 → 4.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 70 IPFIP 3.23 → 3.89 (+0.66)K% 26.7% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.71% | — | ×0.860 | 22.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.04% | — | ×0.900 | 3.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.42% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 4.14% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.23 → 3.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 68 IPFIP 4.12 → 4.41 (+0.29)K% 24.7% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.75% | — | ×0.860 | 21.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.03% | — | ×0.900 | 9.03% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.34% | ÷1.028 | ×1.100 | 3.58% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 4.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 8 IPFIP 2.80 → 4.39 (+1.59)K% 32.1% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.14% | — | ×0.770 | 24.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.57% | — | ×1.150 | 4.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷0.858 | ×1.250 | 5.20% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).
Result: FIP 2.80 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 128 IPFIP 4.92 → 5.38 (+0.46)K% 23.8% → 20.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.80% | — | ×0.880 | 20.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.67% | — | ×1.050 | 9.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.98% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 5.28% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 4.92 → 5.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 109 IPFIP 3.24 → 4.26 (+1.02)K% 26.5% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.50% | — | ×0.810 | 21.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.91% | — | ×1.100 | 5.41% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.21% | ÷0.923 | ×1.200 | 4.17% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.24 → 4.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 102 IPFIP 2.66 → 3.32 (+0.66)K% 18.9% → 14.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.91% | — | ×0.770 | 14.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.73% | — | ×1.150 | 4.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.24% | ÷0.939 | ×1.250 | 1.66% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 2.66 → 3.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.8 | 56 | 19.0% | 7.6% | 1.55 | 5.21 |
| Jose Cabrera ('02) | 1.4 | 68 | 16.2% | 7.9% | 1.39 | 4.95 |
| Carlos Almánzar ('05) | 1.2 | 60 | 16.3% | 7.9% | 1.32 | 4.82 |
| Mike Mayers ('23) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.0% | 8.3% | 1.61 | 5.21 |
| Steve Kealey ('68-'73, -1 WAR*) | 1.1 | 54 | 18.5%* | 7.2%* | 1.32* | 5.26* |
| Randy St. Claire ('84-'94, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 50 | 19.0%* | 8.4%* | 1.39* | 4.61* |
| Chuck Hartenstein ('66-'77, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 59 | 13.7%* | 7.2%* | 1.50* | 5.28* |