Blayne Enlow

P Columbus Clingstones

Age 28 RHP 6'3" / 170 lbs AA peak 0.1 · 2027

Overview

AAPROSPECT

MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	24	MIX2 levels	26	22	99	5.35	3.97	25.2%	7.4%	—	K 20.9% · BB 7.3% · FIP 4.38
2024	25	AAASF	2	2	8	8.22	2.45	18.9%	8.1%	—	K 18.9% · BB 8.1% · FIP 2.53
2026	27	MIX3 levels	25	2	32	6.68	3.87	25.5%	10.6%	—	K 20.8% · BB 15.7% · FIP 5.21
2027PROJ	28	MLBATL	2	2	10	4.95	4.95	22.0%	13.1%	-0.0
2028PROJ31% MLB	29	MLBATL	1	1	6	4.96	5.02	21.9%	12.9%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%

CompsClay Condrey (age 27) · Jason García (age 28) · Dustin Nippert (age 28)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 127119vR 111

ERA4.95

FIP4.95

K%22.0%

BB%13.1%

K-BB%8.9%

Proj IP10

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 10 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2017	18	ROK MLE	GCL Twins	6	1	20	77	19	4	1	17%	3.4	16.8%	6.5%	10.3%	1.8%	1.33	3.50	—
2017	18	ROK RAW	GCL Twins	6	1	20	77	19	4	1	17%	3.4	24.7%	5.2%	19.5%	1.3%	1.33	2.46	—
2018	19	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	20	17	94	408	71	35	4	85%	4.7	12.9%	10.1%	2.8%	1.1%	3.26	3.90	—
2018	19	A RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	20	17	94	408	71	35	4	85%	4.7	17.4%	8.6%	8.8%	1.0%	3.26	3.26	—
2019	20	MIX MLE	2 levels	21	20	111	476	95	38	8	95%	5.3	15.1%	9.3%	5.8%	1.9%	3.82	4.03	—
2019	20	MIX RAW	2 levels	21	20	111	476	95	38	8	95%	5.3	20.0%	8.0%	12.0%	1.7%	3.82	3.35	—
2021	22	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	3	3	15	59	23	6	1	100%	4.9	30.0%	11.7%	18.3%	2.3%	1.84	3.31	—
2021	22	A+ RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	3	3	15	59	23	6	1	100%	4.9	39.0%	10.2%	28.8%	1.7%	1.84	2.08	—
2022	23	MIX MLE	2 levels	25	11	59	271	65	31	5	44%	2.4	20.1%	12.8%	7.3%	1.9%	4.73	4.06	—
2022	23	MIX RAW	2 levels	25	11	59	271	65	31	5	44%	2.4	24.0%	11.4%	12.5%	1.8%	4.73	3.57	—
2023	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	26	22	99	433	109	32	16	85%	3.8	20.9%	7.3%	13.6%	3.9%	5.35	4.38	—
2023	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	26	22	99	433	109	32	16	85%	3.8	25.2%	7.4%	17.8%	3.7%	5.35	3.97	—
2024	25	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	2	2	8	37	7	3	0	100%	3.8	18.9%	8.1%	10.8%	0.0%	8.22	2.53	—
2024	25	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	2	2	8	37	7	3	0	100%	3.8	18.9%	8.1%	10.8%	0.0%	8.22	2.53	—
2024	25	AAA RAW	Sacramento River Cats	2	2	8	37	7	3	0	100%	3.8	18.9%	8.1%	10.8%	0.0%	8.22	2.45	—
2026	27	MIX MLE	3 levels	25	2	32	141	36	15	4	8%	1.3	20.8%	15.7%	5.1%	3.4%	6.68	5.21	—
2026	27	MIX MLE	3 levels	25	2	32	141	36	15	4	8%	1.3	20.8%	15.7%	5.1%	3.4%	6.68	5.21	—
2026	27	MIX RAW	3 levels	25	2	32	141	36	15	4	8%	1.3	25.5%	10.6%	14.9%	2.8%	6.68	3.87	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	28	MLB	ATL	2	2	10	42	9	6	1	100%	5.0	22.0%	13.1%	8.9%	3.0%	4.95	4.95	-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	29	MLB MLE	ATL	3	3	20	84	18	11	3	100%	6.7	21.9%	12.9%	9.0%	3.2%	4.96	5.02	-0.0
2028	29	MLB CTX	ATL	1	1	6	25	6	3	1	100%	6.0	21.9%	12.9%	9.0%	3.2%	4.96	5.02	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		1	1	6	26	6	3	1	100%	6.3	21.9%	12.9%	9.0%	3.2%	4.96	4.64	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		33	33	200	844	192	96	32	100%	6.0	21.9%	12.9%	9.0%	3.2%	4.96	4.64	+0.6
Career	—	MLE		128	78	438	1902	336	189	43	61%	3.4	17.7%	9.9%	7.8%	2.3%	4.27	4.10	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		58	36	200	868	154	86	20	61%	3.4	17.7%	9.9%	7.8%	2.3%	4.27	4.10	-0.3

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Blayne Enlow (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.95	22.0%	13.1%	3.0%	—	5.02	21.9%	9.0%	20	+0.07	—	—	—
Clay Condrey R 2003 · 5.41 FIP	27	SP-	5.41	14.9%	10.1%	4.2%	.303	4.07	13.1%	7.4%	29	-1.34	3.18	250	69
Jason García R 2021 · 4.76 FIP	28	SP-	4.76	17.7%	13.5%	2.6%	.349	—	—	—	—	—	4.16	356	68
Dustin Nippert R 2009 · 4.09 FIP	28	SP-	4.09	18.0%	9.7%	2.3%	.271	4.49	17.9%	6.1%	57	+0.40	3.83	268	67
Zach Stewart R 2015 · 4.43 FIP	28	SP-	4.43	14.4%	8.3%	2.7%	.322	5.17	11.7%	2.1%	51	+0.74	4.27	194	67
Carlos Torres R 2010 · 4.50 FIP	27	SW	4.50	18.3%	11.3%	2.8%	.438	3.89	20.1%	13.2%	139	-0.61	2.89	604	66
Orlando Rodriguez R 2023 · 4.67 FIP	27	SW	4.67	13.7%	10.6%	2.5%	.252	—	—	—	—	—	4.40	119	65
Fabio Castillo R 2017 · 3.98 FIP	28	SP-	3.98	20.9%	8.8%	2.8%	.291	—	—	—	—	—	3.13	195	65
Nolan Sanburn R 2017 · 4.55 FIP	26	SW	4.55	15.0%	10.4%	2.5%	.310	—	—	—	—	—	3.82	169	65
Jefry Rodriguez R 2021 · 5.03 FIP	28	SW	5.03	19.4%	13.5%	3.4%	.287	4.58	19.8%	6.8%	64	-0.45	3.30	578	65
Chi Chi González R 2020 · 4.61 FIP	28	SP-	4.61	17.6%	11.0%	2.9%	.306	4.84	13.6%	7.1%	327	+0.23	4.01	800	64
Eddie Bonine R 2009 · 5.60 FIP	28	SW	5.60	13.1%	7.6%	4.8%	.306	4.54	8.6%	2.0%	68	-1.06	4.40	129	64
Drake Fellows R 2024 · 4.97 FIP	26	SP-	4.97	16.1%	12.7%	2.9%	.293	4.85	14.2%	6.3%	207	-0.12	4.28	282	64
Bradin Hagens R 2018 · 4.92 FIP	29	SP-	4.92	14.9%	9.9%	3.3%	.341	5.46	13.2%	0.6%	66	+0.54	3.79	254	64
Aldo Montes R 2017 · 4.96 FIP	27	SP-	4.96	12.4%	8.5%	3.3%	.322	4.69	18.2%	7.6%	75	-0.27	4.69	210	63
Mitch Neunborn R 2024 · 4.25 FIP	27	SP-	4.25	19.0%	12.0%	2.2%	.285	5.80	16.4%	6.5%	114	+1.55	3.65	248	63
Nelson Gonzalez R 2018 · 5.03 FIP	28	SW	5.03	19.2%	8.2%	4.6%	.311	6.22	16.9%	4.6%	74	+1.19	3.42	258	62
Keyvius Sampson R 2017 · 5.08 FIP	26	SP-	5.08	19.6%	16.4%	2.8%	.333	—	—	—	—	—	4.10	316	62
Alfonso Sanchez R 2016 · 5.26 FIP	28	SW	5.26	15.9%	7.4%	4.7%	.244	5.55	11.2%	2.3%	115	+0.29	4.51	224	62
Josh Roeder R 2019 · 4.71 FIP	26	SW	4.71	15.1%	8.7%	3.3%	.264	—	—	—	—	—	4.71	175	61
Todd Wellemeyer R 2007 · 4.74 FIP	28	SW	4.74	17.0%	10.8%	3.1%	.270	4.86	15.5%	6.4%	373	+0.12	3.35	615	61