Eston Stull

P Cedar Rapids Kernels

Age 28 RHP 6'2" / 195 lbs A+

Overview

A+PROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	26	MIX2 levels	19	0	28	2.89	2.85	21.4%	8.5%	—	K 16.1% · BB 9.4% · FIP 3.58
2026	27	A+MIN	19	1	27	6.07	4.41	31.5%	16.5%	—	K 24.3% · BB 19.0% · FIP 5.62
2027PROJ	28	MLBMIN	15	0	16	5.11	5.11	22.3%	14.7%	-0.1
2028PROJ30% MLB	29	MLBMIN	6	0	6	5.11	5.16	22.2%	14.4%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%

CompsSpencer Bivens (age 28) · Wirfin Obispo (age 30) · Joe Colón J (age 27)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 130122vR 114

ERA5.11

FIP5.11

K%22.3%

BB%14.7%

K-BB%7.6%

Proj IP16

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 16 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	26	MIX MLE	2 levels	19	0	28	117	25	10	1	0%	1.5	16.1%	9.4%	6.7%	1.2%	2.89	3.58	—
2025	26	MIX MLE	2 levels	19	0	28	117	25	10	1	0%	1.5	16.1%	9.4%	6.7%	1.2%	2.89	3.58	—
2025	26	MIX RAW	2 levels	19	0	28	117	25	10	1	0%	1.5	21.4%	8.5%	12.8%	0.9%	2.89	2.85	—
2026	27	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	19	1	27	127	40	21	4	5%	1.4	24.3%	19.0%	5.2%	3.9%	6.07	5.62	—
2026	27	A+ MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	19	1	27	127	40	21	4	5%	1.4	24.3%	19.0%	5.2%	3.9%	6.07	5.62	—
2026	27	A+ RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	19	1	27	127	40	21	4	5%	1.4	31.5%	16.5%	15.0%	3.1%	6.07	4.41	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	28	MLB	MIN	15	0	16	68	15	10	2	0%	1.1	22.3%	14.7%	7.6%	3.0%	5.11	5.11	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	29	MLB MLE	MIN	19	0	20	84	19	12	3	0%	1.1	22.2%	14.4%	7.8%	3.2%	5.11	5.16	-0.1
2028	29	MLB CTX	MIN	6	0	6	25	6	4	1	0%	1.0	22.2%	14.4%	7.8%	3.2%	5.11	5.16	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	26	6	4	1	0%	1.0	22.2%	14.4%	7.8%	3.2%	5.11	4.78	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	198	132	33	0%	1.1	22.2%	14.4%	7.8%	3.2%	5.11	4.78	-0.5
Career	—	MLE		38	1	55	244	50	35	6	3%	1.4	20.3%	14.4%	5.9%	2.6%	4.45	4.64	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		139	4	200	893	182	129	23	3%	1.4	20.3%	14.4%	5.9%	2.6%	4.45	4.64	-1.4

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Eston Stull (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.11	22.3%	14.7%	3.0%	—	5.16	22.2%	7.8%	20	+0.05	—	—	—
Spencer Bivens R 2022 · 4.86 FIP	28	SU	4.86	19.8%	13.5%	3.1%	.265	3.85	18.1%	10.3%	272	-1.01	3.52	391	87
Wirfin Obispo R 2015 · 4.80 FIP	30	SU	4.80	18.6%	12.2%	3.1%	.292	1.31	28.6%	24.5%	126	-3.49	1.30	218	83
Joe Colón J R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	27	SU	4.25	20.4%	12.1%	2.4%	.315	—	—	—	—	—	3.27	113	81
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	81
Cole McDonald R 2024 · 5.01 FIP	27	SU	5.01	20.9%	12.7%	3.8%	.281	—	—	—	—	—	2.81	153	81
Thad Weber R 2013 · 5.18 FIP	28	SU	5.18	16.4%	13.1%	3.3%	.244	4.52	12.2%	6.0%	308	-0.66	4.40	378	80
Ronald Peña R 2019 · 4.55 FIP	27	SU	4.55	20.5%	12.6%	2.9%	.355	4.49	16.5%	6.1%	39	-0.06	3.72	187	80
Arcenio Leon R 2015 · 4.73 FIP	28	SU	4.73	17.9%	12.5%	2.9%	.450	3.37	18.0%	9.1%	85	-1.36	3.00	115	80
Brandon Cunniff R 2017 · 4.79 FIP	28	SU	4.79	20.1%	11.6%	3.5%	.275	6.80	13.9%	-1.9%	30	+2.01	3.89	180	80
Jose De La Torre R 2013 · 5.22 FIP	27	SU	5.22	28.3%	18.9%	3.9%	.308	3.87	17.6%	6.6%	110	-1.35	2.64	141	79
Jose Rafael De Paula R 2019 · 4.43 FIP	28	SU	4.43	23.3%	13.6%	2.9%	.313	—	—	—	—	—	2.64	315	79
Jason Bulger R 2008 · 4.60 FIP	29	SU	4.60	27.4%	12.3%	4.1%	.293	3.94	25.1%	13.3%	90	-0.66	3.78	106	78
Kevin Lenik R 2019 · 4.91 FIP	27	SU	4.91	21.7%	14.9%	3.2%	.205	—	—	—	—	—	3.00	107	78
Jeff Fulchino R 2008 · 4.62 FIP	28	SU	4.62	16.7%	11.1%	2.8%	.380	3.86	21.0%	12.4%	164	-0.76	3.36	178	78
Josh Lueke R 2013 · 4.09 FIP	28	SU	4.09	25.3%	11.1%	3.1%	.333	3.28	24.6%	20.9%	90	-0.81	2.29	191	77
Jose Veras R 2009 · 5.13 FIP	28	SU	5.13	17.8%	12.4%	3.6%	.228	3.57	26.3%	14.0%	186	-1.56	3.37	422	77
Michael Ynoa R 2019 · 4.68 FIP	27	SU	4.68	23.1%	13.8%	3.3%	.281	—	—	—	—	—	3.30	142	77
Keagan Gillies R 2024 · 4.02 FIP	26	SU	4.02	21.1%	13.3%	1.9%	.306	3.91	20.0%	14.4%	74	-0.11	2.93	177	77
Tyler Yates R 2006 · 4.17 FIP	28	SU	4.17	21.2%	10.6%	2.8%	.254	3.70	20.7%	11.1%	151	-0.47	3.23	248	77
Jeff Ames R 2019 · 4.45 FIP	28	SU	4.45	25.6%	16.8%	2.5%	.351	—	—	—	—	—	3.85	272	77