Kevin Miranda

P Vancouver Canadians
Age 28 RHP 5'10" / 178 lbs A+
Overview
A+PROSPECT
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202324MIX2 levels2413863.443.3515.2%5.0%—K 11.5% · BB 5.7% · FIP 3.76
202425MIX4 levels177523.664.4417.1%7.8%—K 13.0% · BB 7.4% · FIP 4.86
202526MIX2 levels136347.945.7816.4%8.2%—K 14.1% · BB 10.0% · FIP 6.37
202627No MLB games played
2027PROJ28MLBTOR——04.844.8418.3%9.2%—
2028PROJ30% MLB29MLBTOR5054.874.9218.6%9.5%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsEddie Bonine (age 28) · Zach Stewart (age 28) · Ramon Delgado (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 125117vR 109
ERA4.84
FIP4.84
K%18.3%
BB%9.2%
K-BB%9.0%
Proj IP18
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 18 IP
K: -0.5 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-1KBB: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-0BBCONTACT: -0.7 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +0.7 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.06 (18 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.10.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202324MIX MLE2 levels2413863625518654%3.611.5%5.7%5.8%1.7%3.443.76—
202324MIX RAW2 levels2413863625518654%3.615.2%5.0%10.2%1.7%3.443.35—
202425MIX MLE4 levels177522053516741%3.013.0%7.4%5.6%3.5%3.664.86—
202425MIX MLE4 levels177522053516741%3.013.0%7.4%5.6%3.5%3.664.86—
202425MIX RAW4 levels177522053516741%3.017.1%7.8%9.3%3.4%3.664.44—
202526MIX MLE2 levels136341592613846%2.614.1%10.0%4.0%5.8%7.946.37—
202526MIX MLE2 levels136341592613846%2.614.1%10.0%4.0%5.8%7.946.37—
202526MIX RAW2 levels136341592613846%2.616.4%8.2%8.2%5.0%7.945.78—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202728MLBTOR——0——————18.3%9.2%9.0%3.2%4.844.84—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202829MLB MLETOR160177013720%1.018.6%9.5%9.1%3.3%4.874.92-0.1
202829MLB CTXTOR505214210%1.018.6%9.5%9.1%3.3%4.874.92-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW505214210%1.018.6%9.5%9.1%3.3%4.874.54+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084415980400%1.118.6%9.5%9.1%3.3%4.874.54+0.0
Career— MLE542617272691522248%3.212.5%7.1%5.3%3.1%4.404.64-0.1
/ 200 IP— MLE6330200844105602648%3.212.5%7.1%5.3%3.1%4.404.64-0.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 A+Vancouver Canadians · 27 IPFIP 4.84 → 6.37 (+1.53)K% 18.3% → 14.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF18.25%—×0.77014.06%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.73%—×1.15010.04%
HR / BF /BF3.97%÷0.855×1.2505.80%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 71).

Result: FIP 4.84 → 6.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 7 IPFIP 8.09 → 10.09 (+2.00)K% 9.1% → 7.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF9.09%—×0.8107.36%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.06%—×1.1006.67%
HR / BF /BF9.09%÷0.885×1.20012.32%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 77).

Result: FIP 8.09 → 10.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 22 IPFIP 4.98 → 5.48 (+0.49)K% 18.1% → 14.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF18.07%—×0.81014.64%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.02%—×1.1006.63%
HR / BF /BF4.82%÷1.145×1.2005.05%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 129).

Result: FIP 4.98 → 5.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Vancouver Canadians · 18 IPFIP 3.58 → 4.13 (+0.55)K% 14.3% → 11.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF14.29%—×0.77011.00%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.14%—×1.1508.21%
HR / BF /BF1.43%÷1.062×1.2501.68%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).

Result: FIP 3.58 → 4.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ADunedin Blue Jays · 10 IPFIP 5.65 → 7.19 (+1.53)K% 20.9% → 15.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF20.93%—×0.74015.49%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.95%—×1.18016.47%
HR / BF /BF4.65%÷1.003×1.3006.03%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).

Result: FIP 5.65 → 7.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Vancouver Canadians · 62 IPFIP 3.95 → 4.30 (+0.34)K% 12.5% → 9.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF12.50%—×0.7709.62%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.51%—×1.1506.34%
HR / BF /BF2.21%÷1.253×1.2502.20%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).

Result: FIP 3.95 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ADunedin Blue Jays · 24 IPFIP 1.55 → 2.14 (+0.59)K% 23.3% → 17.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.33%—×0.74017.27%
BB% (unintentional) /BF3.33%—×1.1803.93%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.279×1.3000.00%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).

Result: FIP 1.55 → 2.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).