Jimmy Burnette
P Buffalo Bisons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 7.87 | 3.90 | 30.0% | 17.1% | — | K 25.2% · BB 16.3% · FIP 4.29 | |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 0 | 48 | 4.69 | 2.52 | 24.4% | 12.0% | — | K 19.9% · BB 12.5% · FIP 3.00 | |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 6.86 | 4.42 | 27.5% | 22.5% | — | K 19.7% · BB 24.4% · FIP 5.55 | |
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBTOR | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.11 | 5.11 | 20.9% | 14.7% | -0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 29 | MLBTOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.11 | 5.16 | 20.9% | 14.4% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 15 | 63 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 30.2% | 14.3% | 15.9% | 0.0% | 4.30 | 2.36 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 15 | 63 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 30.2% | 14.3% | 15.9% | 0.0% | 4.30 | 2.35 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 56 | 250 | 94 | 34 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 29.8% | 15.2% | 14.7% | 2.0% | 4.31 | 3.59 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 56 | 250 | 94 | 34 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 37.6% | 13.6% | 24.0% | 1.6% | 4.31 | 2.50 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 210 | 63 | 36 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.2% | 16.3% | 8.9% | 2.3% | 7.87 | 4.29 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 210 | 63 | 36 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 30.0% | 17.1% | 12.9% | 1.9% | 7.87 | 3.90 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 48 | 217 | 53 | 26 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 12.5% | 7.4% | 0.0% | 4.69 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 48 | 217 | 53 | 26 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.9% | 12.5% | 7.4% | 0.0% | 4.69 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 48 | 217 | 53 | 26 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.4% | 12.0% | 12.4% | 0.0% | 4.69 | 2.52 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 102 | 28 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.7% | 24.4% | -4.8% | 1.9% | 6.86 | 5.55 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 102 | 28 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.7% | 24.4% | -4.8% | 1.9% | 6.86 | 5.55 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 102 | 28 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.5% | 22.5% | 4.9% | 1.0% | 6.86 | 4.42 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | TOR | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.9% | 14.7% | 6.2% | 2.8% | 5.11 | 5.11 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | TOR | 15 | 0 | 16 | 66 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.9% | 14.4% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 5.11 | 5.16 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | TOR | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.9% | 14.4% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 5.11 | 5.16 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 20.9% | 14.4% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 5.11 | 4.78 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 173 | 139 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.9% | 14.4% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 5.11 | 4.78 | -0.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 156 | 0 | 181 | 842 | 210 | 133 | 12 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.9% | 15.8% | 9.1% | 1.4% | 5.52 | 3.76 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 172 | 0 | 200 | 930 | 232 | 147 | 13 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.9% | 15.8% | 9.1% | 1.4% | 5.52 | 3.76 | -1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAABuffalo Bisons · 11 IPFIP 5.39 → 5.55 (+0.16)K% 22.9% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.86% | — | ×0.860 | 19.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 27.14% | — | ×0.900 | 24.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.43% | ÷0.847 | ×1.100 | 1.86% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 69).
Result: FIP 5.39 → 5.55, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 9 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.28 (+0.76)K% 37.5% → 30.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.50% | — | ×0.810 | 30.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.100 | 13.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.885 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 77).
Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.28, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 38 IPFIP 2.21 → 2.80 (+0.59)K% 27.7% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.71% | — | ×0.810 | 22.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.45% | — | ×1.100 | 12.59% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.145 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 129).
Result: FIP 2.21 → 2.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAABuffalo Bisons · 10 IPFIP 3.68 → 3.67 (−0.01)K% 13.7% → 11.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.73% | — | ×0.860 | 11.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.73% | — | ×0.900 | 12.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.990 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 29 IPFIP 4.79 → 5.16 (+0.36)K% 25.2% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.17% | — | ×0.860 | 21.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.37% | — | ×0.900 | 16.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.72% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 3.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 4.79 → 5.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 14 IPFIP 1.42 → 2.27 (+0.84)K% 41.3% → 33.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 41.27% | — | ×0.810 | 33.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.29% | — | ×1.100 | 15.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.42 → 2.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 37 IPFIP 2.66 → 3.50 (+0.83)K% 33.9% → 27.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.94% | — | ×0.810 | 27.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.94% | — | ×1.100 | 15.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.21% | ÷1.027 | ×1.200 | 1.42% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 2.66 → 3.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 19 IPFIP 2.26 → 3.77 (+1.52)K% 44.7% → 34.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 44.71% | — | ×0.770 | 34.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.94% | — | ×1.150 | 14.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.35% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 3.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 2.26 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).