Dale Stanavich
P Richmond Flying Squirrels| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 44 | 0 | 59 | 2.73 | 2.93 | 34.1% | 11.1% | — | K 27.2% · BB 12.7% · FIP 3.99 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 44 | 1 | 56 | 3.38 | 4.92 | 26.1% | 17.1% | — | K 21.6% · BB 16.4% · FIP 5.38 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX3 levels | 36 | 0 | 43 | 6.12 | 4.83 | 29.7% | 14.6% | — | K 25.5% · BB 14.0% · FIP 5.63 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBSF | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.21 | 5.21 | 23.4% | 14.1% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBSF | 7 | 0 | 7 | 5.20 | 5.25 | 23.2% | 13.8% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 11 | 52 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.2% | 15.4% | 3.8% | 1.9% | 11.81 | 4.48 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 0 | 11 | 52 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.2% | 15.4% | 3.8% | 1.9% | 11.81 | 4.69 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A MLE | Jupiter Hammerheads | 24 | 0 | 30 | 135 | 46 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 25.2% | 12.2% | 13.0% | 1.0% | 3.56 | 3.09 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A RAW | Jupiter Hammerheads | 24 | 0 | 30 | 135 | 46 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 34.1% | 10.4% | 23.7% | 0.7% | 3.56 | 1.88 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 44 | 0 | 59 | 252 | 86 | 28 | 6 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.2% | 12.7% | 14.4% | 2.9% | 2.73 | 3.99 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 44 | 0 | 59 | 252 | 86 | 28 | 6 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.2% | 12.7% | 14.4% | 2.9% | 2.73 | 3.99 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 44 | 0 | 59 | 252 | 86 | 28 | 6 | 0% | 1.3 | 34.1% | 11.1% | 23.0% | 2.4% | 2.73 | 2.93 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 1 | 56 | 257 | 67 | 44 | 8 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.6% | 16.4% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 3.38 | 5.38 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 1 | 56 | 257 | 67 | 44 | 8 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.6% | 16.4% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 3.38 | 5.38 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 1 | 56 | 257 | 67 | 44 | 8 | 2% | 1.3 | 26.1% | 17.1% | 8.9% | 3.1% | 3.38 | 4.92 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 36 | 0 | 43 | 192 | 57 | 28 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.5% | 14.0% | 11.5% | 5.3% | 6.12 | 5.63 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 36 | 0 | 43 | 192 | 57 | 28 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 25.5% | 14.0% | 11.5% | 5.3% | 6.12 | 5.63 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 36 | 0 | 43 | 192 | 57 | 28 | 8 | 0% | 1.2 | 29.7% | 14.6% | 15.1% | 4.2% | 6.12 | 4.83 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | SF | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.4% | 14.1% | 9.3% | 3.5% | 5.21 | 5.21 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | SF | 21 | 0 | 22 | 91 | 21 | 13 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 13.8% | 9.4% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 5.25 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | SF | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 13.8% | 9.4% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 5.25 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 13.8% | 9.4% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 4.87 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 207 | 118 | 30 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 13.8% | 9.4% | 3.6% | 5.20 | 4.87 | -0.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 158 | 1 | 199 | 888 | 217 | 126 | 29 | 1% | 1.3 | 24.4% | 14.2% | 10.3% | 3.3% | 4.25 | 4.64 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 159 | 1 | 200 | 892 | 218 | 126 | 29 | 1% | 1.3 | 24.4% | 14.2% | 10.3% | 3.3% | 4.25 | 4.64 | -1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AARichmond Flying Squirrels · 41 IPFIP 4.48 → 5.63 (+1.15)K% 31.5% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.49% | — | ×0.810 | 25.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.71% | — | ×1.100 | 13.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.42% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 5.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.48 → 5.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 28 IPFIP 6.66 → 7.11 (+0.45)K% 18.4% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.44% | — | ×0.860 | 15.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 21.99% | — | ×0.900 | 19.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.26% | ÷0.903 | ×1.100 | 5.19% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 6.66 → 7.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 28 IPFIP 2.48 → 3.27 (+0.79)K% 35.3% → 28.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.34% | — | ×0.810 | 28.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.21% | — | ×1.100 | 12.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷1.103 | ×1.200 | 1.88% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 2.48 → 3.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 40 IPFIP 3.43 → 4.37 (+0.94)K% 35.3% → 28.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.33% | — | ×0.810 | 28.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.17% | — | ×1.100 | 14.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.99% | ÷1.064 | ×1.200 | 3.38% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 3.43 → 4.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Beloit Sky Carp · 17 IPFIP 2.17 → 3.16 (+0.99)K% 31.2% → 24.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.17% | — | ×0.770 | 24.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.79% | — | ×1.150 | 8.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.30% | ÷0.935 | ×1.250 | 1.74% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 2.17 → 3.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AJupiter Hammerheads · 30 IPFIP 1.94 → 3.09 (+1.15)K% 34.1% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.07% | — | ×0.740 | 25.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.37% | — | ×1.180 | 12.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.74% | ÷0.924 | ×1.300 | 1.04% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 1.94 → 3.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AJupiter Hammerheads · 9 IPFIP 5.45 → 6.58 (+1.13)K% 13.3% → 9.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.33% | — | ×0.740 | 9.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.78% | — | ×1.180 | 20.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.22% | ÷0.959 | ×1.300 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 92).
Result: FIP 5.45 → 6.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).